Re: administrivia: new/missing/former ADs

Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im> Fri, 18 February 2011 19:30 UTC

Return-Path: <stpeter@stpeter.im>
X-Original-To: w3c-policy@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: w3c-policy@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A93423A6FB6 for <w3c-policy@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 11:30:33 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id g4k1NsI8D+9o for <w3c-policy@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 11:30:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from stpeter.im (stpeter.im [207.210.219.233]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 849903A6FA4 for <w3c-policy@ietf.org>; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 11:30:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from leavealone.cisco.com (72-163-0-129.cisco.com [72.163.0.129]) (Authenticated sender: stpeter) by stpeter.im (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4462940D1F; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 12:49:24 -0700 (MST)
Message-ID: <4D5EC8F6.1050100@stpeter.im>
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 12:31:02 -0700
From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Thunderbird/3.1.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: John C Klensin <klensin@jck.com>
Subject: Re: administrivia: new/missing/former ADs
References: <4D5EA5A6.70706@stpeter.im> <612494D26335411D1E3D3578@PST.JCK.COM>
In-Reply-To: <612494D26335411D1E3D3578@PST.JCK.COM>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1
OpenPGP: url=http://www.saint-andre.com/me/stpeter.asc
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha1; boundary="------------ms030407090304080802000800"
Cc: W3C/IETF <w3c-policy@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: w3c-policy@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of w3c-ietf policy issues <w3c-policy.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/w3c-policy>, <mailto:w3c-policy-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/w3c-policy>
List-Post: <mailto:w3c-policy@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:w3c-policy-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/w3c-policy>, <mailto:w3c-policy-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 19:30:33 -0000

On 2/18/11 12:24 PM, John C Klensin wrote:
> 
> 
> --On Friday, February 18, 2011 10:00 -0700 Peter Saint-Andre
> <stpeter@stpeter.im> wrote:
> 
>> In addition, the current list of subscribers appears to
>> include a number of people who are no longer actively serving
>> in IETF roles that would necessitate their involvement (Ted
>> Hardie, Harald Alvestrand, Patrik Fältström). I don't know
>> if we have a policy about who is and is not allowed onto this
>> list, but perhaps it's fine for them to still be subscribed if
>> they don't mind the occasional email traffic.
> 
> The historical policy has been that people who have been on the
> list because of earlier roles but who
> 
> 	-- are willing to continue  and
> 	
> 	-- may contribute useful contemporary or historical
> 	perspective
> 
> are left on it.   One way of looking at the reason involves
> noticing that we really don't have a vast surplus of talent and
> perspective in the areas that overlap between the IETF and W3C.
> 
> Of course, that policy can be changed if it makes sense to those
> most actively involved.  But, since you implicitly asked the
> question about what the policy is/was, that is the answer.

Thanks. I was going to explicitly ask about the policy, but I wasn't
sure if there even was a policy (or if there needed to be).

Peter

-- 
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/