Re: [webfinger] Automated Service Configuration now uses webfinger

"Markus Lanthaler" <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net> Tue, 09 July 2013 09:12 UTC

Return-Path: <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
X-Original-To: webfinger@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: webfinger@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84EDF21F9C96 for <webfinger@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Jul 2013 02:12:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.81
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.81 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, MSGID_MULTIPLE_AT=1.449, RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET=1.96]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id F6ythMdxs3Lq for <webfinger@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Jul 2013 02:12:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.22]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AA0021F9D35 for <webfinger@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Jul 2013 02:12:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Vostro3500 ([77.116.247.55]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx102) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MEccf-1UyQzk3mdV-00Fhhx for <webfinger@ietf.org>; Tue, 09 Jul 2013 11:12:38 +0200
From: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
To: webfinger@ietf.org
References: <F23E5FFF11431C634EC5CA18@caldav.corp.apple.com> <036001ce7c5c$38d87b70$aa897250$@packetizer.com>
In-Reply-To: <036001ce7c5c$38d87b70$aa897250$@packetizer.com>
Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2013 11:12:33 +0200
Message-ID: <012301ce7c84$73e66790$5bb336b0$@lanthaler>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0
Content-Language: de
Thread-Index: AQNMTePL77yC9mRw9jaL/5G+2vzIp5ZgGVVwgABS70A=
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:uXMLT22OIgqX8GYTcggPt7Dcf4eJPtCA3ZAa3K84CEasNBq1WWQ OBL8HvFpFIVmPY3AV9cZkOxL70ISQX8yPEKbyiAAxOcnqpOoaDGgn6IXe2rMCMydERR65ir 3pheTKIR5QHV7q915wkXGRd9tlAXrZudtxP17m40S+s9oM1+NTaaG5DmqYYHJTRpWEShi7H JTp/5yPDeZhw/e/FWuWgQ==
Subject: Re: [webfinger] Automated Service Configuration now uses webfinger
X-BeenThere: webfinger@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of the Webfinger protocol proposal in the Applications Area <webfinger.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/webfinger>, <mailto:webfinger-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/webfinger>
List-Post: <mailto:webfinger@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:webfinger-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/webfinger>, <mailto:webfinger-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2013 09:12:46 -0000

On Tuesday, July 09, 2013 6:25 AM, Paul E. Jones wrote:
> Cyrus,
> 
> I had a quick look over the new draft.  I do think it's good that this
will
> utilize WebFinger in order to retrieve service discovery information.
> 
> I am curious about one thing.  When issuing a query to the WF server, the
> server returns a link relation of type "service-configuration".  The
> associated URL in the Appendix B example is
> "https://example.com/service-config".  Since the response from the WF
server
> is for a specific identifier (user), I believe this URL should point
> directly to the service config document for the user.
> 
[...]
>
> I believe for all examples we've considered with WF so far, there was no
> need for the client to perform any manipulation on the URI for the
specific
> link relation.  The examples in this document are the first to do that. Is
> there a reason?  Can I persuade you to put the user-specific URL right
> into the WebFinger response?

I think doing the opposite to make it consistent might be better. The
service-configuration document doesn't contain any information depending on
the user. So, returning *and* requesting https://example.com/service-config
would be better in my opinion.


--
Markus Lanthaler
@markuslanthaler