Re: [webfinger] [apps-discuss] Mail client configuration via WebFinger

Mikael Nordfeldth <mmn@hethane.se> Thu, 14 July 2016 21:52 UTC

Return-Path: <mmn@hethane.se>
X-Original-To: webfinger@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: webfinger@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F32A812D8B4 for <webfinger@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 Jul 2016 14:52:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.188
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.188 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.287, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gJ_eCytf7Vs5 for <webfinger@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 Jul 2016 14:52:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.hethane.se (hethane.se [85.11.25.76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BE00E12D8A9 for <webfinger@ietf.org>; Thu, 14 Jul 2016 14:52:43 -0700 (PDT)
To: Eric Mill <eric@konklone.com>
References: <em44c60c65-2d14-46a0-adb3-a52d38d160ed@helsinki> <575197C1.3090102@dmfs.org> <39fe811e-282a-2a08-2928-c78c3947a6b9@aol.com> <575492E1.2000805@dmfs.org> <57587369.20405@dmfs.org> <em1601bf25-0972-435d-8537-b3a6d19b5b33@sydney> <5786C161.7070806@dmfs.org> <emdb968062-c47f-4fb3-b4b8-ba787cfb56eb@sydney> <CANBOYLWyuFcGnLE2arivxiuYgmTnNDHdDi5YpWXO6F4ruY1UdA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Mikael Nordfeldth <mmn@hethane.se>
Message-ID: <c017e113-edb9-781f-17ce-df8a7ef4623d@hethane.se>
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2016 23:51:35 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/45.1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CANBOYLWyuFcGnLE2arivxiuYgmTnNDHdDi5YpWXO6F4ruY1UdA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="j6lN7X15Pab1qorFOtot3nBfgHpXUJXuW"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/webfinger/Q0Wd7DyrqBRI-9qZagXdF7vkjoo>
Cc: "webfinger@ietf.org" <webfinger@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [webfinger] [apps-discuss] Mail client configuration via WebFinger
X-BeenThere: webfinger@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of the Webfinger protocol proposal in the Applications Area <webfinger.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/webfinger>, <mailto:webfinger-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/webfinger/>
List-Post: <mailto:webfinger@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:webfinger-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/webfinger>, <mailto:webfinger-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2016 21:52:47 -0000

On 2016-07-14 17:59, Eric Mill wrote:
> Is any of this relevant? Webfinger seems good and truly dead.

I beg to differ. WebFinger, RFC7033, is the primary discovery method in
GNU social and we're alive and kicking.

-- 
Mikael Nordfeldth
https://blog.mmn-o.se/
XMPP/mail: mmn@hethane.se
OpenPGP Fingerprint: AE68 9813 0B7C FCE3 B2FA  727B C7CE 635B B52E 9B31