Re: [webfinger] FW: [apps-discuss] I-D Action: draft-ietf-appsawg-webfinger-08.txt

chris.dent@gmail.com Sun, 23 December 2012 15:54 UTC

Return-Path: <chris.dent@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: webfinger@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: webfinger@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEC3F21F882A for <webfinger@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 23 Dec 2012 07:54:15 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.307
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.307 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, MISSING_HEADERS=1.292, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wsdL7ftEZOqx for <webfinger@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 23 Dec 2012 07:54:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wg0-f46.google.com (mail-wg0-f46.google.com [74.125.82.46]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAAFA21F86B3 for <webfinger@ietf.org>; Sun, 23 Dec 2012 07:54:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wg0-f46.google.com with SMTP id dr13so2823619wgb.1 for <webfinger@ietf.org>; Sun, 23 Dec 2012 07:54:13 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:date:from:x-x-sender:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id :references:user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=Mywff7iMaeDj5qCIBZ5OvDv789NGZw8N1D8/2TabY7I=; b=GwSzHiyCubDIQzOPNGvG/uWiJw0x9rFM6OxNNGsNNraFIx15FKdHOkpHruBVsE+mbD u607PpwwXeDCaOhIHnf/Ugt1vSf2707sPjb5hh9KhGrfhZz8Owr/2gP7RQQxUewO4xa6 LuMA6focT41xUJ1F4DQi0zmi4Glu6ZkcZo23/uZabZLHJw5mMrO7r1XS4Rb+CqMnYxYp B17crobPPL9O9rLMf81Su8TrvY+cT+UlN3OLmaba2rmlQHbTFSuCVnIl9sfnMeOnjPp9 ihIoWE3xSKgZMiEZ9bcEmqXv8hTHsCXyvMYGcUa9ss34VkO9SNoMXsPr/mjfGcbcDn4C dSAw==
X-Received: by 10.180.8.130 with SMTP id r2mr24285740wia.28.1356278053740; Sun, 23 Dec 2012 07:54:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from crank.home (host81-155-125-190.range81-155.btcentralplus.com. [81.155.125.190]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id g2sm28729522wiy.0.2012.12.23.07.54.11 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 23 Dec 2012 07:54:12 -0800 (PST)
Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2012 15:54:09 +0000
From: chris.dent@gmail.com
X-X-Sender: cdent@crank.local
cc: webfinger@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <CAHBU6iupJ9hc==wj8XVO5MUL6gnr57BgSbaLmrcTGds-6iYfkg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.OSX.2.00.1212231542050.68565@crank.local>
References: <20121221172032.28253.90788.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <065701cddfa1$fa73bc70$ef5b3550$@packetizer.com> <CAKaEYh+E6WBkw=HBVOb7H-kHNYTabY-GS3pmdRyMAJkeSOv1hg@mail.gmail.com> <CAHBU6iupJ9hc==wj8XVO5MUL6gnr57BgSbaLmrcTGds-6iYfkg@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (OSX 1167 2008-08-23)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Subject: Re: [webfinger] FW: [apps-discuss] I-D Action: draft-ietf-appsawg-webfinger-08.txt
X-BeenThere: webfinger@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of the Webfinger protocol proposal in the Applications Area <webfinger.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/webfinger>, <mailto:webfinger-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/webfinger>
List-Post: <mailto:webfinger@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:webfinger-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/webfinger>, <mailto:webfinger-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2012 15:54:15 -0000

On Sat, 22 Dec 2012, Tim Bray wrote:

> I've also wondered why we don't have application/webfinger+json; seems to
> me that having your own media-type is a strong Web best practice.  Has this
> been discussed?  -T

Can you point me to references to _why_ that is "best practice"?

It's something I find quite annoying. It's application/json, being
used in a webfinger context. In some other context it could be used
for something else.

In both contexts it is a JSON representation, you use JSON tools to
process it.

Having another media-type seems to just make things more noisy. Is the
point to have some little agent sitting around being all smart because
it can trigger imporant decision based merely on the media-type of its
input? If that's so, I'm not sure I buy it: We wouldn't have gone to
this resource in the first place if we weren't hoping to get webfinger
info back.

Help me understand.

Thanks.

-- 
Chris Dent                                   http://burningchrome.com/
                                 [...]