Re: [webfinger] Looking for JRDs
"Paul E. Jones" <paulej@packetizer.com> Mon, 29 July 2013 03:55 UTC
Return-Path: <paulej@packetizer.com>
X-Original-To: webfinger@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: webfinger@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 883E321F9F12 for <webfinger@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 28 Jul 2013 20:55:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.305
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.305 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.159, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, HTTP_ESCAPED_HOST=0.134]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ys80iWlegoUW for <webfinger@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 28 Jul 2013 20:55:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dublin.packetizer.com (dublin.packetizer.com [75.101.130.125]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 879BA21F9E51 for <webfinger@ietf.org>; Sun, 28 Jul 2013 20:55:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sydney (rrcs-98-101-148-48.midsouth.biz.rr.com [98.101.148.48]) (authenticated bits=0) by dublin.packetizer.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r6T3tMwM014998 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Sun, 28 Jul 2013 23:55:23 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=packetizer.com; s=dublin; t=1375070125; bh=vXeD1oiVFu2dJwpmkT3wlKxiKwO7tGtVkCwM1oMPDhc=; h=From:To:Cc:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=EX8bzAiJKfcLUwtFAbzZ9TEGa2PsOCCaZbVoKSzkPOMD88yRSP0oqXezCZgksBFn7 /luiAn5y5dXzuBFjd3TBFrqvUrKj7ZBvK1Egq8nx0r4CrJUGpRW7KCFSrftbfrH0kt grChiGxFzOvNR2GqQxt/ISD91WfdZsPHsdSGbXaA=
From: "Paul E. Jones" <paulej@packetizer.com>
To: 'Melvin Carvalho' <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>, 'Javier Rojas Blum' <javier@gluu.org>
References: <CAHBU6ivuHwToVHEyDuU3AKnd-nD-5ee20is_8U+fOkA1uszbzA@mail.gmail.com> <00d301ce80ff$fffd76e0$fff864a0$@packetizer.com> <CAHBU6itqxCfAgQSVOMKhbcBLe4afNW7QF5C4tMsHC1EKGBt+Gg@mail.gmail.com> <4E1F6AAD24975D4BA5B16804296739436B6F7E7A@TK5EX14MBXC284.redmond.corp.microsoft.com> <4E1F6AAD24975D4BA5B16804296739436B6F81E7@TK5EX14MBXC284.redmond.corp.microsoft.com> <1374516883.73070.YahooMailNeo@web184401.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> <51EEDE9C.8020105@gluu.org> <05cb01ce87de$62c09200$2841b600$@packetizer.com> <51EEE28E.7080604@gluu.org> <CAKaEYhL3nda4umxv-5i==L3yzkbjEGE_Z-48kHvG9mZQ5wXHzQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAKaEYhL3nda4umxv-5i==L3yzkbjEGE_Z-48kHvG9mZQ5wXHzQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 28 Jul 2013 23:55:24 -0400
Message-ID: <016101ce8c0f$759aa430$60cfec90$@packetizer.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0162_01CE8BED.EE8B9C40"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQL/r+No/hn+Dxq4/2ORfMNzEE5vjgGfjNBBAk5SfHcBYrYgdgKGwE2GAVKR0D8CoDoGBQEixDXtAtnNNrsBNNtgdJaQ4bmA
Content-Language: en-us
Cc: 'webfinger' <webfinger@ietf.org>, 'Edmund Jay' <ejay@mgi1.com>, 'Tim Bray' <tbray@textuality.com>, openid-connect-interop@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [webfinger] Looking for JRDs
X-BeenThere: webfinger@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of the Webfinger protocol proposal in the Applications Area <webfinger.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/webfinger>, <mailto:webfinger-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/webfinger>
List-Post: <mailto:webfinger@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:webfinger-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/webfinger>, <mailto:webfinger-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2013 03:55:45 -0000
Melvin, Ideally, new values would be registered with IANA. That ought to come in the form of an RFC to fully explain their purpose so that there is no misunderstanding as to the intent of any particular "rel" value. The "blog" one I assigned under the packetizer.com domain was done since there wasn't one (AFAIK) that meant precisely the same thing. I expect some non-registered values will conflict with other non-registered values. That's OK. People build products and need an identifier. We see this with every protocol. Once there is a certain amount of momentum for it and/or people feel a "rel" ought to be registered because it has wide applicability, then definitely register a value. Paul From: Melvin Carvalho [mailto:melvincarvalho@gmail.com] Sent: Sunday, July 28, 2013 6:58 PM To: Javier Rojas Blum Cc: Paul E. Jones; webfinger; Tim Bray; openid-connect-interop@googlegroups.com; Edmund Jay Subject: Re: [webfinger] Looking for JRDs On 23 July 2013 22:07, Javier Rojas Blum <javier@gluu.org> wrote: Please try this: https://seed.gluu.org/.well-known/webfinger?resource=acct:javier@seed.gluu.o rg <https://seed.gluu.org/.well-known/webfinger?resource=acct:javier@seed.gluu. org&rel=http%3A%2F%2Fopenid.net%2Fspecs%2Fconnect%2F1.0%2Fissuer> &rel=http%3A%2F%2Fopenid.net%2Fspecs%2Fconnect%2F1.0%2Fissuer I'm seeing a lot of global keys ("rel" parameters) that are not in the official registry: http://www.iana.org/assignments/link-relations/link-relations.xhtml e.g. evan's "favourites" "lists", nick's "auth-endpoint", paul's "test" and quite a few more -- it seems something of a free for all, how are clients supposed to interpret these? some of these links do not resolve anywhere such as : http://schemas.google.com/g/2010%23updates-from others such as "http://packetizer.com/rel/blog" seem to be creating existing concepts -- would it not be better to reuse things long standing dictionaries such foaf, schema.org, sioc, open graph protocol etc. Regards -- Javier On 07/23/2013 03:54 PM, Paul E. Jones wrote: I get a 200 OK when I query, but the message body appears to be empty. From: webfinger-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:webfinger-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Javier Rojas Blum Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2013 3:51 PM To: Edmund Jay Cc: webfinger@ietf.org; openid-connect-interop@googlegroups.com; Tim Bray; Paul E. Jones Subject: Re: [webfinger] Looking for JRDs acct:javier@seed.gluu.org acct:mike@seed.gluu.org -- Javier On 07/22/2013 02:14 PM, Edmund Jay wrote: The following can be used : alice@connect.openid4.us or bob@connect.openid4.us -- Edmund _____ From: Mike Jones <mailto:Michael.Jones@microsoft.com> <Michael.Jones@microsoft.com> To: <mailto:openid-connect-interop@googlegroups.com> "openid-connect-interop@googlegroups.com" <mailto:openid-connect-interop@googlegroups.com> <openid-connect-interop@googlegroups.com>; Tim Bray <mailto:tbray@textuality.com> <tbray@textuality.com>; Paul E. Jones <mailto:paulej@packetizer.com> <paulej@packetizer.com> Cc: <mailto:webfinger@ietf.org> "webfinger@ietf.org" <mailto:webfinger@ietf.org> <webfinger@ietf.org> Sent: Saturday, July 20, 2013 10:51 PM Subject: RE: [webfinger] Looking for JRDs Could those of you with OpenID OPs that support discovery please post specific identifiers using e-mail address syntax that Tim could use for testing e-mail based discovery using WebFinger? Thanks all, -- Mike From: openid-connect-interop@googlegroups.com [mailto:openid-connect-interop@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Mike Jones Sent: Saturday, July 20, 2013 4:34 PM To: Tim Bray; Paul E. Jones Cc: webfinger@ietf.org; openid-connect-interop@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [webfinger] Looking for JRDs See http://osis.idcommons.net/wiki/Category:OC5_OP for a list of OpenID providers, most of which implement Discovery, including WebFinger. -- Mike From: webfinger-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:webfinger-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Tim Bray Sent: Friday, July 19, 2013 9:34 PM To: Paul E. Jones Cc: webfinger@ietf.org Subject: Re: [webfinger] Looking for JRDs Got an OpenID Connect provider? rel=http://openid.net/specs/connect/1.0/issuer On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 7:07 PM, Paul E. Jones <paulej@packetizer.com> wrote: Tim, You're welcome to test my addresses, including mailto: / acct: / xmpp: Most of what is returned is just test data (though some is valid), but it should be properly formatted. I have aliases, properties, titles, and non-ASCII characters in the acct: reply. I'm happy to throw something in if you want to check a particular response. Paul From: webfinger-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:webfinger-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Tim Bray Sent: Sunday, July 14, 2013 5:54 PM To: webfinger@ietf.org Subject: [webfinger] Looking for JRDs Working on some WF code... looking for some candidate addresses/domains to test JRD wrangling. Suggestions? -T -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "OpenID Connect Interop" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to openid-connect-interop+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "OpenID Connect Interop" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to openid-connect-interop+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. _______________________________________________ webfinger mailing list webfinger@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/webfinger _______________________________________________ webfinger mailing list webfinger@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/webfinger _______________________________________________ webfinger mailing list webfinger@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/webfinger
- [webfinger] Looking for JRDs Tim Bray
- Re: [webfinger] Looking for JRDs Paul E. Jones
- Re: [webfinger] Looking for JRDs Eric Mill
- Re: [webfinger] Looking for JRDs Tim Bray
- Re: [webfinger] Looking for JRDs Evan Prodromou
- Re: [webfinger] Looking for JRDs Nick Jennings
- Re: [webfinger] Looking for JRDs Tim Bray
- Re: [webfinger] Looking for JRDs Tim Bray
- Re: [webfinger] Looking for JRDs Paul E. Jones
- Re: [webfinger] Looking for JRDs Mike Jones
- Re: [webfinger] Looking for JRDs Mike Jones
- Re: [webfinger] Looking for JRDs Nick Jennings
- Re: [webfinger] Looking for JRDs Paul E. Jones
- Re: [webfinger] Looking for JRDs Tim Bray
- Re: [webfinger] Looking for JRDs Paul E. Jones
- Re: [webfinger] Looking for JRDs Tim Bray
- Re: [webfinger] Looking for JRDs Edmund Jay
- Re: [webfinger] Looking for JRDs Edmund Jay
- Re: [webfinger] Looking for JRDs Roland Hedberg
- Re: [webfinger] Looking for JRDs Javier Rojas Blum
- Re: [webfinger] Looking for JRDs Paul E. Jones
- Re: [webfinger] Looking for JRDs Javier Rojas Blum
- Re: [webfinger] Looking for JRDs Paul E. Jones
- Re: [webfinger] Looking for JRDs Javier Rojas Blum
- Re: [webfinger] Looking for JRDs Paul E. Jones
- Re: [webfinger] Looking for JRDs Melvin Carvalho
- Re: [webfinger] Looking for JRDs Nick Jennings
- Re: [webfinger] Looking for JRDs Melvin Carvalho
- Re: [webfinger] Looking for JRDs Paul E. Jones
- Re: [webfinger] Looking for JRDs Melvin Carvalho