[webfinger] Is application/json an acceptable content type for JRDs?

Eric Mill <eric@konklone.com> Sat, 12 October 2013 22:29 UTC

Return-Path: <konklone@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: webfinger@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: webfinger@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3E0111E8155 for <webfinger@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 12 Oct 2013 15:29:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.977
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.977 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gEUasZ8RiEUq for <webfinger@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 12 Oct 2013 15:29:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ea0-x231.google.com (mail-ea0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4013:c01::231]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24E1811E80F7 for <webfinger@ietf.org>; Sat, 12 Oct 2013 15:29:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ea0-f177.google.com with SMTP id f15so2599304eak.36 for <webfinger@ietf.org>; Sat, 12 Oct 2013 15:29:32 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=ZMLpu82YCE1g7M3ezRtxU83sVL8nmFLfB0+GMktaC6w=; b=G+eMdfog9JSg6WUPJ2Hi08PSeoDhZQARCAsCnaeo9yt98LyP1Yzr+42wFDAAq4NMEi TzCTrGJme/+oCo6LFCBh8qh5hhtD2S9LINmBbf0y8dZWfC1YRooqwXqJ3+jeU8WIxhg+ wZTD3tU45gB1IXrO2FYmaHIOLIZQBEUxfS62fZFxOsHSbTaXeEEeeZh/5Ph9Z52bvhJp Q/RTx+Qvhv5swC0stAWlNE1HNQxXXw8+1q/oy1j9Gbn/FqakhM3hftxy4abikQDZyKfD deIFBi7ghy0WQt2AQF3kbBhsa57ZuckAO8fq1VgFsca217W7bk0Ya9Zheo/VRBu90LPC UaQg==
X-Received: by 10.14.107.68 with SMTP id n44mr42134743eeg.26.1381616972154; Sat, 12 Oct 2013 15:29:32 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: konklone@gmail.com
Received: by 10.223.167.69 with HTTP; Sat, 12 Oct 2013 15:28:50 -0700 (PDT)
From: Eric Mill <eric@konklone.com>
Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2013 18:28:50 -0400
X-Google-Sender-Auth: xzTzcQBMGR3iisunHQgibSn2WNY
Message-ID: <CANBOYLU4q_BFZEAB21AQ-s6HZaDDY4trRY97pkVWoyrYNBfMfA@mail.gmail.com>
To: "webfinger@ietf.org" <webfinger@ietf.org>, webfinger@googlegroups.com
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c29ad2d74d9c04e892c44d
Subject: [webfinger] Is application/json an acceptable content type for JRDs?
X-BeenThere: webfinger@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of the Webfinger protocol proposal in the Applications Area <webfinger.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/webfinger>, <mailto:webfinger-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/webfinger>
List-Post: <mailto:webfinger@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:webfinger-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/webfinger>, <mailto:webfinger-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2013 22:29:35 -0000

I've been reading through the Webfinger spec, and it uses
application/jrd+json in all the examples, and describes the media type it's
registering -- but it never says whether or not a server using
application/json as a content type should fail or not.

I could potentially see some servers wishing to use application/json, so
that applications that are used for all kinds of JSON manipulation, like
JSONView, could properly pick up on it.

-- Eric

-- 
konklone.com | @konklone <https://twitter.com/konklone>