Re: [webfinger] Looking for JRDs

"Paul E. Jones" <paulej@packetizer.com> Mon, 22 July 2013 18:46 UTC

Return-Path: <paulej@packetizer.com>
X-Original-To: webfinger@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: webfinger@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB42021F8FDC for <webfinger@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Jul 2013 11:46:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZWxy4kNPoIsX for <webfinger@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Jul 2013 11:46:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dublin.packetizer.com (dublin.packetizer.com [75.101.130.125]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C9F221F94DC for <webfinger@ietf.org>; Mon, 22 Jul 2013 11:46:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sydney (rrcs-98-101-148-48.midsouth.biz.rr.com [98.101.148.48]) (authenticated bits=0) by dublin.packetizer.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r6MIkjqS007827 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 22 Jul 2013 14:46:45 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=packetizer.com; s=dublin; t=1374518805; bh=v28WBvNX4pmpugvUcEd4zXeJadgEaJrSeVch5vzjvHI=; h=From:To:Cc:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=QgcXwQ2Mxe0LMCHuMqt2IYTqZ380Ce8Y++q0iP/vocucJBrgB+UHKZ4LDT/ReIwFl 2PVy4/4zhxWnszjXjZWMor9HN3MBVsesmhuG3OQdADwux/T12C21RQpPymyOgqVui7 ntTTXIqMTcozNkdnVoVXihCIIsCzGfT1c2Z3+mi4=
From: "Paul E. Jones" <paulej@packetizer.com>
To: "'Tim Bray'" <tbray@textuality.com>
References: <CAHBU6ivuHwToVHEyDuU3AKnd-nD-5ee20is_8U+fOkA1uszbzA@mail.gmail.com> <00d301ce80ff$fffd76e0$fff864a0$@packetizer.com> <CAHBU6itqxCfAgQSVOMKhbcBLe4afNW7QF5C4tMsHC1EKGBt+Gg@mail.gmail.com> <4E1F6AAD24975D4BA5B16804296739436B6F7E7A@TK5EX14MBXC284.redmond.corp.microsoft.com> <4E1F6AAD24975D4BA5B16804296739436B6F81E7@TK5EX14MBXC284.redmond.corp.microsoft.com> <1374516883.73070.YahooMailNeo@web184401.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> <03b801ce8708$cd5a2c10$680e8430$@packetizer.com> <CAHBU6ivKr14qwfeof=g6eSw+2GgO-6=dHouobLoPZ7sVNAdLdA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAHBU6ivKr14qwfeof=g6eSw+2GgO-6=dHouobLoPZ7sVNAdLdA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2013 14:46:48 -0400
Message-ID: <03e901ce870b$d2a8f040$77fad0c0$@packetizer.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_03EA_01CE86EA.4B994C10"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQL/r+No/hn+Dxq4/2ORfMNzEE5vjgGfjNBBAk5SfHcBYrYgdgKGwE2GAVKR0D8CE3h2fQIi07aRlqO2HAA=
Content-Language: en-us
Cc: webfinger@ietf.org, openid-connect-interop@googlegroups.com, 'Edmund Jay' <ejay@mgi1.com>
Subject: Re: [webfinger] Looking for JRDs
X-BeenThere: webfinger@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of the Webfinger protocol proposal in the Applications Area <webfinger.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/webfinger>, <mailto:webfinger-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/webfinger>
List-Post: <mailto:webfinger@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:webfinger-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/webfinger>, <mailto:webfinger-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2013 18:46:52 -0000

Sorry… I meant the “expires” member of the JRD returned has been removed.  Obviously, we cannot remove the HTTP header ;-)

 

Paul

 

 

From: Tim Bray [mailto:tbray@textuality.com] 
Sent: Monday, July 22, 2013 2:37 PM
To: Paul E. Jones
Cc: Edmund Jay; openid-connect-interop@googlegroups.com; webfinger@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [webfinger] Looking for JRDs

 

Hm?  You mean the HTTP Expires header?  Why should recipients act in a non-HTTP-standard way?  I don’t think we’re allowed to rewrite HTTP rules.  -T

 

On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 11:25 AM, Paul E. Jones <paulej@packetizer.com> wrote:

Edmund,

 

Note that we removed the “expires” header from the current WebFinger spec.  It’s OK to have it there, but it should be ignored by recipients.

 

Paul

 

From: Edmund Jay [mailto:ejay@mgi1.com] 
Sent: Monday, July 22, 2013 2:15 PM
To: openid-connect-interop@googlegroups.com; Tim Bray; Paul E. Jones
Cc: webfinger@ietf.org


Subject: Re: [webfinger] Looking for JRDs

 

The following can be used : 

 

alice@connect.openid4.us or

bob@connect.openid4.us

 

-- Edmund

  _____  

From: Mike Jones <Michael.Jones@microsoft.com>
To: "openid-connect-interop@googlegroups.com" <openid-connect-interop@googlegroups.com>om>; Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>om>; Paul E. Jones <paulej@packetizer.com> 
Cc: "webfinger@ietf.org" <webfinger@ietf.org> 
Sent: Saturday, July 20, 2013 10:51 PM
Subject: RE: [webfinger] Looking for JRDs

 

Could those of you with OpenID OPs that support discovery please post specific identifiers using e-mail address syntax that Tim could use for testing e-mail based discovery using WebFinger?

 

                                                            Thanks all,

                                                            -- Mike

 

From: openid-connect-interop@googlegroups.com [mailto:openid-connect-interop@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Mike Jones
Sent: Saturday, July 20, 2013 4:34 PM
To: Tim Bray; Paul E. Jones
Cc: webfinger@ietf.org; openid-connect-interop@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [webfinger] Looking for JRDs

 

See http://osis.idcommons.net/wiki/Category:OC5_OP for a list of OpenID providers, most of which implement Discovery, including WebFinger.

 

                                                            -- Mike

 

From: webfinger-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:webfinger-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Tim Bray
Sent: Friday, July 19, 2013 9:34 PM
To: Paul E. Jones
Cc: webfinger@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [webfinger] Looking for JRDs

 

Got an OpenID Connect provider? rel=http://openid.net/specs/connect/1.0/issuer

 

On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 7:07 PM, Paul E. Jones <paulej@packetizer.com> wrote:

Tim,

 

You’re welcome to test my addresses, including mailto: / acct: / xmpp: 

 

Most of what is returned is just test data (though some is valid), but it should be properly formatted.

 

I have aliases, properties, titles, and non-ASCII characters in the acct: reply.  I’m happy to throw something in if you want to check a particular response.

 

Paul

 

From: webfinger-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:webfinger-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Tim Bray
Sent: Sunday, July 14, 2013 5:54 PM
To: webfinger@ietf.org
Subject: [webfinger] Looking for JRDs

 

Working on some WF code... looking for some candidate addresses/domains to test JRD wrangling.  Suggestions? -T

 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "OpenID Connect Interop" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to openid-connect-interop+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "OpenID Connect Interop" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to openid-connect-interop+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.