Re: [webfinger] Registration of a URN for WebFinger Properties

"Paul E. Jones" <paulej@packetizer.com> Fri, 11 October 2013 19:16 UTC

Return-Path: <paulej@packetizer.com>
X-Original-To: webfinger@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: webfinger@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BA7021E80FA for <webfinger@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Oct 2013 12:16:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.267
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.267 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.331, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IqpfYx9ytAoG for <webfinger@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Oct 2013 12:16:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dublin.packetizer.com (dublin.packetizer.com [75.101.130.125]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8535A21E8106 for <webfinger@ietf.org>; Fri, 11 Oct 2013 12:16:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.20] (rrcs-98-101-148-48.midsouth.biz.rr.com [98.101.148.48]) (authenticated bits=0) by dublin.packetizer.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r9BJFxFU029756 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 11 Oct 2013 15:16:00 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=packetizer.com; s=dublin; t=1381518960; bh=/t9mF5zIT3Vz6t5FL6FxynPzTVUc9eFS6FzNPtDEf6U=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=Ordjg97mu18scuckKKkdjkECcElNN4kUIHwxLFeWCVcwmYIboK4a9ZaGrjA2nGpmb NRGn4TqWFMpHgNq5OuZA8lD+OfeZnAtvC4Yny22aneI0mD4Ek31Q0po5tA5ytroMUJ itE2WVewwXMVEd5keZbkgZUmAyCs8JhqY0KjBsYY=
Message-ID: <52584B25.3060804@packetizer.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2013 15:01:57 -0400
From: "Paul E. Jones" <paulej@packetizer.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Will Norris <will@willnorris.com>
References: <CAKaEYhJEvfiPT-5zTjnVXSpyGxYnpOO5gB0wvjgcHB6u6Fq6RQ@mail.gmail.com> <em19baa0e5-7a97-44ab-874e-b084b9645052@sydney> <CAKaEYhJGY4xn_1UQbWPV=qRpwPcS1JP2cme7OYyyy7i1UvcuXg@mail.gmail.com> <52583040.1060405@packetizer.com> <CAJqAn3zHu87D0Y0B5ZUjOTF2=UT8wpD7iPkvwedNyqiYw7SGMg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAJqAn3zHu87D0Y0B5ZUjOTF2=UT8wpD7iPkvwedNyqiYw7SGMg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------040200000503060905010200"
Cc: webfinger <webfinger@ietf.org>, Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [webfinger] Registration of a URN for WebFinger Properties
X-BeenThere: webfinger@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of the Webfinger protocol proposal in the Applications Area <webfinger.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/webfinger>, <mailto:webfinger-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/webfinger>
List-Post: <mailto:webfinger@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:webfinger-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/webfinger>, <mailto:webfinger-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2013 19:16:17 -0000

On 10/11/2013 2:57 PM, Will Norris wrote:
>
>     FOAF does not define a set of URI.  Rather, it's XML-based
>     markup.  WebFinger uses URIs as identifiers.  I don't really care
>     where those identifiers are defined, but at present there is no
>     standard property identifer in URI form that means "name".
>
>
> http://schema.org/name ?  Of course that doesn't have the language 
> fragment, though as you point out below, there's an argument it may 
> not be needed anyway.  /shrug

Yeah, that would work.  And one cold add a URI fragment to that 
definition easily enough.

These are all too easy to create.  Who will put a stake in the ground 
and declare one property ID is the standard?

Paul