[webfinger] New WebFinger Draft posted

"Paul E. Jones" <paulej@packetizer.com> Fri, 09 August 2013 16:17 UTC

Return-Path: <paulej@packetizer.com>
X-Original-To: webfinger@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: webfinger@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A31EC21E808A for <webfinger@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Aug 2013 09:17:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.490, BAYES_05=-1.11]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pu6qTdzavDMC for <webfinger@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Aug 2013 09:17:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dublin.packetizer.com (dublin.packetizer.com [75.101.130.125]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3523E11E81A5 for <webfinger@ietf.org>; Fri, 9 Aug 2013 09:09:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sydney (rrcs-98-101-148-48.midsouth.biz.rr.com [98.101.148.48]) (authenticated bits=0) by dublin.packetizer.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r79G9f5m013959 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for <webfinger@ietf.org>; Fri, 9 Aug 2013 12:09:42 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=packetizer.com; s=dublin; t=1376064582; bh=GC/9h9kHjurtbvvSra35ObVs6KwcueWbpRBe3L7yA84=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=kjyFJ28EKBsQH+rDSuqVGTwwogJMxN0vfKJUNKk5Z7t/Me3Vz9TcUVqDaP3bVZcxM W5tFt1qTu18CJTVTZpygKcLEZNnK+HbHm/d1SJ/nYwqsOUgtUW7x8xzYCwrJ7P3hwj cMauzrsIatcLsejyURyvr7n/1tHlgg1GcANdh2Jw=
From: "Paul E. Jones" <paulej@packetizer.com>
To: "'webfinger'" <webfinger@ietf.org>
Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2013 12:09:55 -0400
Message-ID: <087c01ce951a$e32da1f0$a988e5d0$@packetizer.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: Ac6VGZcQqZ04lDZOR3WbbyXqRiI0pQ==
Content-Language: en-us
Subject: [webfinger] New WebFinger Draft posted
X-BeenThere: webfinger@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of the Webfinger protocol proposal in the Applications Area <webfinger.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/webfinger>, <mailto:webfinger-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/webfinger>
List-Post: <mailto:webfinger@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:webfinger-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/webfinger>, <mailto:webfinger-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Aug 2013 16:17:59 -0000

Folks,

As we're trying to bring the WebFinger spec to a close, we published a new
version -17 with some changes the WG might want to consider.

Draft is:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-appsawg-webfinger-17

Those changes are:

- Section 2, added a new last paragraph to explain what URI syntax we use in
WebFinger
- Corrected error in section 3.2 ("Host:" line in example and quotes around
"3.2")
- We remove the words "absolute URI" since it's really redundant
- Added "query target" to 4.5 for clarity
- Introduced a new section 8 that describes "WebFinger" applications.  This
is a major new addition.
- Added a new section 10.3 and 10.4 to address registration of link relation
types and properties.  Link relations types already have a registry and we
refer to existing procedures.  WebFinger properties did not have a registry,
so we define one, primarily for the purpose of helping people avoid creating
redundant definitions.

If you have any questions or comments, please feel free to post to the list.


Paul