Re: [webfinger] Registration of a URN for WebFinger Properties

Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> Sat, 05 October 2013 01:43 UTC

Return-Path: <barryleiba.mailing.lists@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: webfinger@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: webfinger@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 594C621F9A97 for <webfinger@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Oct 2013 18:43:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.985
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.985 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.007, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lExzLINfLQy4 for <webfinger@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Oct 2013 18:43:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-la0-x22c.google.com (mail-la0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c03::22c]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D260C21F9978 for <webfinger@ietf.org>; Fri, 4 Oct 2013 18:43:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-la0-f44.google.com with SMTP id eo20so3925572lab.3 for <webfinger@ietf.org>; Fri, 04 Oct 2013 18:43:31 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=xsIp8Dy78FxjYCeKFG4EyfEzNEcqPx85q4oEu14LVQc=; b=d3WD/QMsi0ql9hxA5luCnIAsKUDxMHmFLmC+eIwKPvM8ZUGRMyZqE9LfMOQTzSnIJV nnzMMbc9k9KLQU1uVOZ7QM58sGBv9b+jmCTigORt+AmT6077qT0KZDUsSl1GBepyl9Wm yc7RBwjAswqRmlDYLnkxGcXOwxUtO1ttlDbzt7ivEURpRKfNi2n9jp/CnTP8Kg+UGpXT Yw2zUsJgdE36DLQTwnGfMIjTw4Wp9/plNQH69gjd0HJQqJhfkVK7Synw4uie+zdOp8Ap CNSAJtDeuQA6W4NSnhdA8QxryL41Ig0Y29bH2ASAfPW/tJTB28HgeEHrotrg9ijUfxcu xEFA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.152.26.72 with SMTP id j8mr14478606lag.19.1380937410451; Fri, 04 Oct 2013 18:43:30 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: barryleiba.mailing.lists@gmail.com
Received: by 10.112.134.232 with HTTP; Fri, 4 Oct 2013 18:43:30 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <em8fca55dc-a3ff-4231-8218-6c2221838850@sydney>
References: <em8fca55dc-a3ff-4231-8218-6c2221838850@sydney>
Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2013 21:43:30 -0400
X-Google-Sender-Auth: RRcxBzzI-HoLAh-XkwlTK2JGBXQ
Message-ID: <CAC4RtVDTBCxVh-Lw9PWYZAZJOgfN4UzZN=r9x1HFqpLt73Pttw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
To: "Paul E. Jones" <paulej@packetizer.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Cc: "webfinger@ietf.org" <webfinger@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [webfinger] Registration of a URN for WebFinger Properties
X-BeenThere: webfinger@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of the Webfinger protocol proposal in the Applications Area <webfinger.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/webfinger>, <mailto:webfinger-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/webfinger>
List-Post: <mailto:webfinger@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:webfinger-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/webfinger>, <mailto:webfinger-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Oct 2013 01:43:35 -0000

> Defining the various properties and their meaning is an exercise for another
> day, but I hope you see the value in defining the URN sub-namespace.

I do, but I don't see the value of defining it *before* there's
something to register in it.  Had it been defined in the webfinger
spec, I'd say fine.  But it seems unnecessary to mint a document just
to define it.  Why not just let the first usage of it do the defining?

Barry