Re: [webfinger] Simplifying and unjamming WebFinger
Evan Prodromou <evan@e14n.com> Sat, 15 June 2013 01:09 UTC
Return-Path: <evan@e14n.com>
X-Original-To: webfinger@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: webfinger@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1393F21E8082 for <webfinger@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 14 Jun 2013 18:09:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.001, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id w8-GUDLVesWK for <webfinger@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 14 Jun 2013 18:09:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from office.statusnetinc.com (office.statusnetinc.com [50.57.148.252]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4264C21E804E for <webfinger@ietf.org>; Fri, 14 Jun 2013 18:09:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.24] (pool-64-223-125-116.burl.east.myfairpoint.net [64.223.125.116]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by office.statusnetinc.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CF1BF8D4534 for <webfinger@ietf.org>; Sat, 15 Jun 2013 01:26:52 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <51BBBEC0.9050007@e14n.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2013 21:09:20 -0400
From: Evan Prodromou <evan@e14n.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130510 Thunderbird/17.0.6
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "webfinger@ietf.org" <webfinger@ietf.org>
References: <CAHBU6is9Fq8YkT=FFCa7qTn-=cFH75JCn6_uSahuhqb7AvbJCg@mail.gmail.com> <CAKaEYh+7gpQAxyNV=D4zmgkiH2CyqbYFOvbw7tL0Ydhy-yzqPg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAKaEYh+7gpQAxyNV=D4zmgkiH2CyqbYFOvbw7tL0Ydhy-yzqPg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [webfinger] Simplifying and unjamming WebFinger
X-BeenThere: webfinger@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of the Webfinger protocol proposal in the Applications Area <webfinger.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/webfinger>, <mailto:webfinger-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/webfinger>
List-Post: <mailto:webfinger@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:webfinger-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/webfinger>, <mailto:webfinger-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2013 01:09:28 -0000
Trying to change the spec at this late date is not the way to get it to ship. I realize the intentions are good but there are probably better ways to get us to release this spec. -Evan
- [webfinger] Simplifying and unjamming WebFinger Tim Bray
- Re: [webfinger] Simplifying and unjamming WebFing… Eric Mill
- Re: [webfinger] Simplifying and unjamming WebFing… Brad Fitzpatrick
- Re: [webfinger] Simplifying and unjamming WebFing… Mike Jones
- Re: [webfinger] Simplifying and unjamming WebFing… Melvin Carvalho
- Re: [webfinger] Simplifying and unjamming WebFing… Evan Prodromou
- Re: [webfinger] Simplifying and unjamming WebFing… Gonzalo Salgueiro
- Re: [webfinger] Simplifying and unjamming WebFing… Eric Mill
- Re: [webfinger] Simplifying and unjamming WebFing… Gonzalo Salgueiro