IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Webpush] Polling to adopt VAPID draft

Richard Maher <maherrj@googlemail.com> Tue, 05 April 2016 12:42 UTC

Return-Path: <maherrj@googlemail.com>
X-Original-To: webpush@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: webpush@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FADC12D687 for <webpush@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Apr 2016 05:42:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=googlemail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PIyqejcEiS1i for <webpush@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Apr 2016 05:42:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf0-x22b.google.com (mail-lf0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4E6D212D669 for <webpush@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Apr 2016 05:42:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id g184so9531367lfb.3 for <webpush@ietf.org>; Tue, 05 Apr 2016 05:42:36 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc; bh=Lk+EeEMWmjclSHyz0LvtEMEsCKfxIKimjgbgRiRbXIU=; b=YS+wH5jWogy5nJzNA85X04w5YlyJqnlACPZznU00pwgJpzYZEDYI0kg8W+rlVPoAzx hPQl0Y92TD5nduNdtG3zpOcWOTDCeSi2NnFBQ8fxZSt1V8Hz9mxjPTrxhjwbD3tSPhwR SPCJfijwkxl2wpT1zv9T0W1ML5FRonDCfU/6tIAwxEhanvEEpa8P3LMvG/EtfVzuOuw6 L+wsJ/XwSqR2a5XjsqW531U3JWOWLqKgnnv4lVD7GEwH3r/5Sk3UZ3HQf3SQ5JD9gdqk yDApbEuBOUI+ZTrnw50mcZJp5gUGsmAMqqQ55wduQ6bsL2IUE4qv3u7s+Sh34nBrMGv3 /6Uw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc; bh=Lk+EeEMWmjclSHyz0LvtEMEsCKfxIKimjgbgRiRbXIU=; b=I325YpRahJYqOe6neQtG5k5+oKyvTa+sWfJBtKHpzDW1MARA+vwg7wHbIRaxwxcQNO 9XvoVHMx69RZTeSryKdDMFuv5yuCUC4nFFqO/XdL6VNa0BiWEIPS2/Tz6xGGFnTsxWRY hBBge3rOaujRhlmh4fSSXev8SMDN4AmFAA/OR+VxWEEW76pCpGDDLNnJtk5DVMuhPYIF i1CL4eJ75OWY+TNVS7drWEHxF+NfmZ+YsN+kmFXSkSPGRQazxhS+sitVhibk7n/jxlMX BSFjmclOWFNleer54PFWLqaEqxrmIXggdLRtIxT8D1KWAZ+ae9DW5q7Ce7GOhwjrAamh E+Kg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJIGcl2tnZG9VeOG9DUJ3D61/miQYI76GQIXtNhBXGlhXeX/7y+Wor0kQwUyAbGxm6HKSTxEbp1P3gZYoQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.25.21.28 with SMTP id l28mr5676227lfi.165.1459860154467; Tue, 05 Apr 2016 05:42:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.114.200.208 with HTTP; Tue, 5 Apr 2016 05:42:34 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <57031F98.3080300@mozilla.com>
References: <9EDD05BA-A6D3-4F37-8E65-19D573324966@ntt-at.com> <57031F98.3080300@mozilla.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2016 20:42:34 +0800
Message-ID: <CABvL1xogUKmLdJgUtwq+-4qQhzn+2Hsq2JK3G-e5vsZKktXy6g@mail.gmail.com>
From: Richard Maher <maherrj@googlemail.com>
To: jr conlin <jconlin@mozilla.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113e5b92edfbc6052fbc2d03
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/webpush/0-_f7lD1LAxbA3fmCcvXxOTso4I>
Cc: webpush@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Webpush] Polling to adopt VAPID draft
X-BeenThere: webpush@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of potential IETF work on a web push protocol <webpush.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/webpush>, <mailto:webpush-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/webpush/>
List-Post: <mailto:webpush@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:webpush-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/webpush>, <mailto:webpush-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2016 12:42:44 -0000

Hi jr,

As a "service provider" what are YOU going to provide?

So subscription.getKey() is now a mandatory method?

Does Mozilla need to implement "xxx_sender_id" in the manifest?

Why is there no talk of TOPIC subscriptions? A server subscribing a client
to a TOPIC is surely bullshit?

Can't these standards proposals ever talk about implementations? Who wins?
Google, Mozilla, Someone else?


Cheers Richard Maher (I liked Dallas)


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: jr conlin <jconlin@mozilla.com>
Date: Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 10:14 AM
Subject: Re: [Webpush] Polling to adopt VAPID draft
To: webpush@ietf.org


As a service provider, I express my strong support for the VAPID
specification.

On 04/04/2016 03:18 PM, Shida Schubert wrote:


All;

As I mentioned at the meeting today, I am polling the list for adopting
VAPID draft as a WG item for a milestone “voluntary application
identification mechanism for web push draft to IESG as Proposed Standard”.

https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-thomson-webpush-vapid-02.txt

If you have concern or objections with this, please express your opinion(s)
by responding to this e-mail.

If you like the draft, see value and you like to see it adopted, please
express that as well by responding to this e-mail.
*Even if you have expressed your interest previously in the room or on the
list, please express your support again.

If you are confused with this e-mail, please let me know :)

Thanks!
Shida as co-chair



_______________________________________________
Webpush mailing
listWebpush@ietf.orghttps://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/webpush



_______________________________________________
Webpush mailing list
Webpush@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/webpush

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email