Re: [Webpush] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on draft-ietf-webpush-protocol-11: (with COMMENT)
kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com Thu, 13 October 2016 01:51 UTC
Return-Path: <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: webpush@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: webpush@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2C1712940D;
Wed, 12 Oct 2016 18:51:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7,
SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id IH_yzi307qle; Wed, 12 Oct 2016 18:51:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qt0-x233.google.com (mail-qt0-x233.google.com
[IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::233])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 99E00129405;
Wed, 12 Oct 2016 18:51:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qt0-x233.google.com with SMTP id f6so31573315qtd.2;
Wed, 12 Oct 2016 18:51:36 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc
:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to;
bh=/CdFwSnXbG+svn+6m2arCAI/ptmFp7PyxR/oNsHf3xE=;
b=Or6wNW/m+u9Ol37Cwcp6hqQyxFa2uFaWmtZpYfklFR0eisP+xFnpt2cMOJwxK/SFLe
us9zYZgc9x/ti489p5XVY2VrFwvNZDgrueRVf7lGskkkM/Zza2koPlzvtdpsHX40uh43
UGKibtIlDECUCNhi38cTwscpenckgYMd/34VJ73Wp1I70HUS52dzyJvgHRFZkBqgNuXi
Y1NVzuu96Y6Q76woZAYqsYFDhj9mDsl6dXqtZZ4zzEBRucjaMWJ2VNNTDccBl37MQ5xw
UhV1BxWgDRFEBeMDs43yy9Ny8kegch8ycIqY61numBrkQWMgl7U3lUuvowLll85SN/TE
j0UA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc
:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to;
bh=/CdFwSnXbG+svn+6m2arCAI/ptmFp7PyxR/oNsHf3xE=;
b=OZhmxGgTxgkxc2XRt6KSynZfjx8h2FD01Hyd9OPDxOH0egM1v7dqmHVc6Nfc3gIyUD
9zATDLcaKk0OREKtFnpqae+yX/Do2tU+87d4PQz4xVsm6AhQPxTJ/zM812wwdMvioR6E
67m+H6ml056AnjvSsSsTYVy6s84CXPziQYlyT0oTidIETaxYp90Jh4W8cCNLc7C3Oe3v
j3Nq5jsZu6GJqp9b8n1EbARX83/8USrZFMsSoVdu+2P2B5boM5e1/4BXj3B+GWgmeUGb
nwmZaDQ0G9tMN+xmIHxLr+5fvXw+WII6WtuAu+fRRJpZD/Zq/+Bzb1P3k7yADQk4ljjf
kukA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AA6/9RkYFKF0GetbJ2u4LuLxDb4cs/adNE8jtCalpN36obRIQxiWbAZG4KCiJo+oHn3bjw==
X-Received: by 10.200.45.124 with SMTP id o57mr4306548qta.90.1476323495812;
Wed, 12 Oct 2016 18:51:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.4]
(209-6-124-204.c3-0.arl-ubr1.sbo-arl.ma.cable.rcn.com. [209.6.124.204])
by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u4sm3799093qka.9.2016.10.12.18.51.34
(version=TLS1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128);
Wed, 12 Oct 2016 18:51:34 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
From: kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (13G36)
In-Reply-To: <CY1PR03MB23809509AFCB9DBB5B66900083DC0@CY1PR03MB2380.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2016 21:51:34 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <EB148FDB-4AB6-41D1-B2B2-2E6E8632EAE2@gmail.com>
References: <147629678445.6285.5038003546245862234.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
<CY1PR03MB23809509AFCB9DBB5B66900083DC0@CY1PR03MB2380.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
To: Brian Raymor <Brian.Raymor@microsoft.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/webpush/0KU17UBYUYFSPXnGmwsLSzGc_cU>
Cc: "draft-ietf-webpush-protocol@ietf.org"
<draft-ietf-webpush-protocol@ietf.org>, Shida Schubert <shida@ntt-at.com>,
"webpush-chairs@ietf.org" <webpush-chairs@ietf.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>,
"webpush@ietf.org" <webpush@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Webpush] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on
draft-ietf-webpush-protocol-11: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: webpush@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of potential IETF work on a web push protocol
<webpush.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/webpush>,
<mailto:webpush-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/webpush/>
List-Post: <mailto:webpush@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:webpush-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/webpush>,
<mailto:webpush-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2016 01:51:39 -0000
Please excuse typos, sent from handheld device > On Oct 12, 2016, at 9:09 PM, Brian Raymor <Brian.Raymor@microsoft.com> wrote: > > >> The only thing I might add is a note on the varying levels of security >> offered by the HTTP authentication methods, which are documented in their >> RFCs. Adding just that point to the following (phrased however you'd >> like) would be helpful: >> A push service MAY >> choose to authorize requests based on any HTTP-compatible >> authorization method available, of which there are numerous options. > >> The somewhat recent updates to Basic & Digest do a really great job at >> saying how awful they are and there are some experimental options that >> offer some promise now. > > Proposed text - https://github.com/webpush-wg/webpush-protocol/pull/139/files Thanks for the quick update. I would just say 'with varying levels of security.' The security considerations sections for each of the methods available for HTTP are included in the RFCs for each. Thank you, Kathleen > > >
- [Webpush] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on dra… Kathleen Moriarty
- Re: [Webpush] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on… Brian Raymor
- Re: [Webpush] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on… kathleen.moriarty.ietf
- Re: [Webpush] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on… Brian Raymor
- Re: [Webpush] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on… Kathleen Moriarty