[Webpush] Work venue (Re: Niceness or urgency of messages)
Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Mon, 01 February 2016 23:32 UTC
Return-Path: <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: webpush@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: webpush@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2633E1B389C
for <webpush@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Feb 2016 15:32:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9,
DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1,
FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id QZq71tzx2xG5 for <webpush@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Mon, 1 Feb 2016 15:32:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-io0-x235.google.com (mail-io0-x235.google.com
[IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::235])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 383BF1B389B
for <webpush@ietf.org>; Mon, 1 Feb 2016 15:32:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-io0-x235.google.com with SMTP id 9so97319243iom.1
for <webpush@ietf.org>; Mon, 01 Feb 2016 15:32:03 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type;
bh=6ff9AbbUQBxEMoa3DyiDuUp9Ow2E33WgKS1gFSB2BN0=;
b=iBa7XzX64Yg3NunbK7EB7AM/sTXEQiQEGEHEX6l0/5NuYgWZgWjSyruvrlXN2OByTw
ob+99Tuw88mUe6n1tksfRfyv155airmSect+1aeTGARVsIQhcGKbQJIJ0d25MU4g58lY
OpTWdkwA5b1qd8eomrMQzT541MBv+kJcq+y7ByDK0GPVBTwFoy4TgQEQK7pmzrb5jbvP
bQTHUatJsoxUwUVtVxuftywqh1bos3LnJPwkF1yHFOMtrNJuOqq0IKy0qfTRyM9DdddH
ljeSsNZ/yMMdUX9KHE+W+YPMSPGuAGLPGzLYhFnpxVY+YXS33B27YDu2BJPBFeYLZSg4
LtAQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc
:content-type;
bh=6ff9AbbUQBxEMoa3DyiDuUp9Ow2E33WgKS1gFSB2BN0=;
b=mJ+Xok2uJPrf5rTmU8CKMmBeTliiQhZZfXwmD9Yzd+CEE2M+StZVufV1fMjYqJOuIF
SuPRj1H47H5wzf8WwAfdK9s0hDkPw6L+HzAouYEqXLl7Sy8OcYLFh2mhnDOqbQf62g66
Q53fBiKYmbJMnGy3zw6k1+urPWEhJ1rRC0lJyqDlg3XzNp1rWCDC0YPIPRFuroYVCuaq
AvchtRo2C9a4eGpae0RaAZgMXVd6GtfAavfZpm4R40OiK3ZwQoAnEmlU93X2VGok7TRA
EIeajmXSf8cTohOQnfYZbbyNoQ6srfHsIaM6fHaaoyOF/hfRI9P3Jw3nEWiL7wcDk1p0
iYkA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOTFQ5ZSTSyYEJ0zD77O+rB0U+OT78D9QZlaYEQwNBJg80jU99tdc7tJH/8I9szfVmNbNeF9H9xGXTLvAg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.107.131.38 with SMTP id f38mr20660242iod.190.1454369522623;
Mon, 01 Feb 2016 15:32:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.36.149.130 with HTTP; Mon, 1 Feb 2016 15:32:02 -0800 (PST)
Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2016 10:32:02 +1100
Message-ID: <CABkgnnV-mQwX0iKE37fHZVFLUNn8vcO0Vn5Gb6GxhqvWYocO_Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
To: Shida Schubert <shida@ntt-at.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/webpush/1T4DmOEuKbmdjCSpvV3NsgOXs00>
Cc: Brian Raymor <Brian.Raymor@microsoft.com>,
"webpush@ietf.org" <webpush@ietf.org>
Subject: [Webpush] Work venue (Re: Niceness or urgency of messages)
X-BeenThere: webpush@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of potential IETF work on a web push protocol
<webpush.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/webpush>,
<mailto:webpush-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/webpush/>
List-Post: <mailto:webpush@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:webpush-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/webpush>,
<mailto:webpush-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Feb 2016 23:32:05 -0000
On 1 February 2016 at 18:38, Shida Schubert <shida@ntt-at.com> wrote: > I think for now we need to strike a balance of contributors not having have > to waste their energy keeping the WG in loop but making sure some of the > critical changes discussed on github is distributed on the ML. I think that we've missed that balance recently. I will try to ensure that I bring any substantive discussion here and limit discussion on github to editorial matters.
- Re: [Webpush] Work venue (Re: Niceness or urgency… Shida Schubert
- [Webpush] Work venue (Re: Niceness or urgency of … Martin Thomson