Re: [Webpush] Receipt subscription follow-up
Brian Raymor <Brian.Raymor@microsoft.com> Wed, 27 April 2016 00:29 UTC
Return-Path: <Brian.Raymor@microsoft.com>
X-Original-To: webpush@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: webpush@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4869312D532
for <webpush@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Apr 2016 17:29:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.003
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.003 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001,
RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001]
autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
header.d=microsoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id vmD9X7mPoSr3 for <webpush@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Tue, 26 Apr 2016 17:29:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from na01-bl2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com
(mail-bl2on0140.outbound.protection.outlook.com [65.55.169.140])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C890912D52E
for <webpush@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Apr 2016 17:29:33 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com;
s=selector1; h=From:To:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version;
bh=NUwYIHqyDphMOnjSPApHAZGnLTqmD22VW/kCH3zxVLs=;
b=IGa6pDRCXjg84DqoLdzuKfLdoG5iNjp1hZJbvHb/kf06o9vhpVEURJbUT4xqyad+rr4VIQs9EbOJ3GHU0dv+ltW1Viwf64wXdblPjdkb6YwoRSRqDLdsycokoxmbOEJddk/0dplaIAiX/M6jQq0Zs/Ogx/tFYQBDjjC1p9f9q1o=
Received: from CO2PR03MB2407.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.166.93.137) by
CO2PR03MB2405.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.166.93.135) with Microsoft SMTP
Server (TLS) id 15.1.477.8; Wed, 27 Apr 2016 00:29:32 +0000
Received: from CO2PR03MB2407.namprd03.prod.outlook.com ([10.166.93.137]) by
CO2PR03MB2407.namprd03.prod.outlook.com ([10.166.93.137]) with mapi id
15.01.0477.012; Wed, 27 Apr 2016 00:29:31 +0000
From: Brian Raymor <Brian.Raymor@microsoft.com>
To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>, "webpush@ietf.org"
<webpush@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Webpush] Receipt subscription follow-up
Thread-Index: AQHRn07lqbBQG1UN8Ead0PaEULBvX5+c9xVQ
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2016 00:29:31 +0000
Message-ID: <CO2PR03MB24076724ECF95BDBB9B83E0F83640@CO2PR03MB2407.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
References: <CABkgnnXKDZvLWxkhFP0R4jW=ZyFwqiqQREFA5BFKH9i4PQCmyA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABkgnnXKDZvLWxkhFP0R4jW=ZyFwqiqQREFA5BFKH9i4PQCmyA@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: gmail.com; dkim=none (message not signed)
header.d=none;gmail.com; dmarc=none action=none header.from=microsoft.com;
x-originating-ip: [24.16.23.27]
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: bc912fd2-3ff1-4f0e-e435-08d36e330071
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; CO2PR03MB2405;
5:KsYprB5NL+avWxMpYLz/tt7IrAemlMVKd2PXUGFsts5JfSqW7J7e/vV1bbdp3KllQjxqzIu7OAu88hM6L0wDqlhlU5EhqqO9DnW2QrNsylYT+wpIvnX+3A/838tYIxv7F/Iw26EQ0jKwKdlZmEVVxg==;
24:KWc7NU15XOw1dsPV7VBy0rt94PNSWJfaCeKL/D7btYd2rWrWUgaNkC/oQqu0IKc2QZJfbJvsCJ0mvJ/bF1Vl5ARdlKt1D4hN6KsFcngVeFs=;
7:xbTnFAlJG5L+seC5J7ahIjLhc9gIfi435CNegvKGSb+5D0fA2MItJUlr7BaYtWMwCiLDMiJvdNF8xr4iP1MztBfu3v5/kvRF4MSjPffd3DiHUnVaV1nYVZVf6Tqbcr5wGRkb6oZokM3OXN1nKOZ5jV4bqycpFS82G5XNZ+Yor2H0Htp55omthHGTXHtq601FkHmvA4ysXrgrbS7wHeELVw==
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:CO2PR03MB2405;
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <CO2PR03MB24050F0BA8D3CE5B5EE75E8883640@CO2PR03MB2405.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:;
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0;
RULEID:(9101521072)(61425038)(601004)(2401047)(5005006)(8121501046)(10201501046)(3002001)(6055026)(61426038)(61427038);
SRVR:CO2PR03MB2405; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:CO2PR03MB2405;
x-forefront-prvs: 0925081676
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM;
SFS:(10019020)(979002)(6009001)(24454002)(377454003)(12063002)(106116001)(1220700001)(1096002)(99286002)(5008740100001)(19580405001)(122556002)(2900100001)(19580395003)(2950100001)(8990500004)(86612001)(5004730100002)(54356999)(10290500002)(10090500001)(87936001)(107886002)(10400500002)(76176999)(5005710100001)(3280700002)(3660700001)(66066001)(50986999)(189998001)(74316001)(76576001)(2906002)(9686002)(81166005)(81156013)(86362001)(102836003)(561944003)(92566002)(5001770100001)(77096005)(15975445007)(5003600100002)(3846002)(5002640100001)(586003)(33656002)(6116002)(2501003)(969003)(989001)(999001)(1009001)(1019001);
DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:CO2PR03MB2405;
H:CO2PR03MB2407.namprd03.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; MLV:ovrnspm;
PTR:InfoNoRecords; LANG:en;
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:23
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: microsoft.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 27 Apr 2016 00:29:31.6723 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 72f988bf-86f1-41af-91ab-2d7cd011db47
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: CO2PR03MB2405
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/webpush/4NaJqQtHWHEvb2J262_Msr5n6_w>
Subject: Re: [Webpush] Receipt subscription follow-up
X-BeenThere: webpush@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of potential IETF work on a web push protocol
<webpush.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/webpush>,
<mailto:webpush-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/webpush/>
List-Post: <mailto:webpush@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:webpush-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/webpush>,
<mailto:webpush-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2016 00:29:36 -0000
On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 5:02 PM Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> wrote: > Not wanting to steal, Brian's thunder here, but this is the change we > discussed during the meeting: > https://github.com/webpush-wg/webpush-protocol/pull/84 > It's good stuff, but there's a small wrinkle I thought that I'd raise: > https://github.com/webpush-wg/webpush-protocol/issues/85 <snip> I've adopted Martin's proposal in #85 and made further clarifications based on the initial review of the pull request. If there are no further comments, I'll merge the pull request on Wednesday. I'd like to publish -05 before EOW. Thanks, ...Brian
- [Webpush] Receipt subscription follow-up Martin Thomson
- Re: [Webpush] Receipt subscription follow-up Costin Manolache
- Re: [Webpush] Receipt subscription follow-up Martin Thomson
- Re: [Webpush] Receipt subscription follow-up Costin Manolache
- Re: [Webpush] Receipt subscription follow-up Costin Manolache
- Re: [Webpush] Receipt subscription follow-up Martin Thomson
- Re: [Webpush] Receipt subscription follow-up Costin Manolache
- Re: [Webpush] Receipt subscription follow-up Martin Thomson
- Re: [Webpush] Receipt subscription follow-up Martin Thomson
- Re: [Webpush] Receipt subscription follow-up Costin Manolache
- Re: [Webpush] Receipt subscription follow-up Martin Thomson
- Re: [Webpush] Receipt subscription follow-up Brian Raymor
- Re: [Webpush] Receipt subscription follow-up Costin Manolache
- Re: [Webpush] Receipt subscription follow-up Martin Thomson
- Re: [Webpush] Receipt subscription follow-up Costin Manolache
- Re: [Webpush] Receipt subscription follow-up Martin Thomson
- Re: [Webpush] Receipt subscription follow-up Costin Manolache
- Re: [Webpush] Receipt subscription follow-up Brian Raymor
- Re: [Webpush] Receipt subscription follow-up Costin Manolache
- Re: [Webpush] Receipt subscription follow-up Martin Thomson
- Re: [Webpush] Receipt subscription follow-up Brian Raymor
- Re: [Webpush] Receipt subscription follow-up Martin Thomson
- Re: [Webpush] Receipt subscription follow-up Brian Raymor
- Re: [Webpush] Receipt subscription follow-up Martin Thomson
- Re: [Webpush] Receipt subscription follow-up Costin Manolache
- Re: [Webpush] Receipt subscription follow-up Brian Raymor
- Re: [Webpush] Receipt subscription follow-up RUELLAN Herve