IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Webpush] When UA should send an acknowledgement?

Benjamin Bangert <bbangert@mozilla.com> Wed, 08 June 2016 02:59 UTC

Return-Path: <bbangert@mozilla.com>
X-Original-To: webpush@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: webpush@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FF9812D967 for <webpush@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Jun 2016 19:59:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.601
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.601 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mozilla-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yb_vA41NXtOT for <webpush@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Jun 2016 19:59:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io0-x236.google.com (mail-io0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 504641200A0 for <webpush@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Jun 2016 19:59:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io0-x236.google.com with SMTP id 5so32067247ioy.1 for <webpush@ietf.org>; Tue, 07 Jun 2016 19:59:43 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mozilla-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc; bh=gdoTF3zCktvnaZYwZZQyRzweT87GvK3Io/PzSiX3/3w=; b=HmVpoVDsTKdbuSuFmwOGjxJxuevF4uB5PTF7fmWKrMDMvQp4HTbOpCjPSZp+iuoH74 kB49T0pzsFL8DuVt7G0mB2ioaesYpI1QSyVV2xUEvBytZpsmQmAMtp3O/FngHB+MRnR7 megDORgtp41X6x5WZAUfMM0WAWMJ5XA0ehKHpzTlsJ04kqY9Kgx65Xek8S3+jqUkJsMx 3JNsNuHmVy0X1kzkrmNOIQqcR7mu0JuPh58frrAcpbw/gW/Cw1+0BsdUUjyHc15BysKo S1+AmYe3uzyJMNi41RMjAN/IefR4wil2FDjosdaFVA1fuQlOPpeaFHDi5R0CfmsffazF fNxg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc; bh=gdoTF3zCktvnaZYwZZQyRzweT87GvK3Io/PzSiX3/3w=; b=PvHt/Cc+5YJXDlBiOWXtTnCP48Kmj6+XMKAt2X01ADZl1PQYKt1hAgIkzKciv04lyz QhYAEHMiZOnMbsqwHd+nNVysWsDZte2xbQXlK2EuvfKWRYV3Rr6sRO++M6cMtEPehq85 paXBbNtk3uWt8LZSnoaNGVuibXdX0ljOWfvkNkKHWE7WFCZh8gEDDVQ7/czzPFREZGFw aC4x6zGWorTxWhCk/dEI1xiHOYiVqzL/HdLTRfVoUoXCLQl57Llno58XqvjZL+4pGEY0 6y3JOppNuDVgOMAWS6lDCgthu8OrFIdUIbBXlnhUpUcCMYDw1Ae560jh87PBykzudz/s KxCA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tKKCrmon7ofIPvepiSiQb0YexAmifIRIdjY1eauNyh+CYQQgciH+mC54VwylnyVv2jJScaNMrMpcuUeAWBR
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.107.201.3 with SMTP id z3mr4731861iof.120.1465354782409; Tue, 07 Jun 2016 19:59:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.79.76.194 with HTTP; Tue, 7 Jun 2016 19:59:42 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CABkgnnVSrKp8sf31qpBztp1FH=AQHFCoAH9XVQx6JyU4BoEQaQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAN+BUJpdSB-HvT6VQzVcAPqzwb_pn=HzLOC3r4ntSKjDh3ffLA@mail.gmail.com> <CABkgnnVSrKp8sf31qpBztp1FH=AQHFCoAH9XVQx6JyU4BoEQaQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2016 19:59:42 -0700
Message-ID: <CABp8EuKDPELuuDjN4vKwEqf+_2J14piDTmbUx-uayUppP77EjQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Benjamin Bangert <bbangert@mozilla.com>
To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/webpush/4O8_bCIIRzkGIUBERhn2yZ-zUXQ>
Cc: "webpush@ietf.org" <webpush@ietf.org>, Idel Pivnitskiy <idel.pivnitskiy@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Webpush] When UA should send an acknowledgement?
X-BeenThere: webpush@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of potential IETF work on a web push protocol <webpush.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/webpush>, <mailto:webpush-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/webpush/>
List-Post: <mailto:webpush@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:webpush-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/webpush>, <mailto:webpush-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2016 02:59:46 -0000

On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 7:34 PM, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 7 June 2016 at 09:02, Idel Pivnitskiy <idel.pivnitskiy@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Just a question: When should UA send an acknowledgement? Immediately after
>> receiving a push message or after decryption/decoding/processing a push
>> message?
>
> This is defined in
> http://w3c.github.io/push-api/index.html#the-push-event  (Step 6.5.3
> is the acknowledgment.)
>
> What a user agent does with the message is outside this spec.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Webpush mailing list
> Webpush@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/webpush

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email