IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Webpush] Different status codes for negative Push Message Receipts

Brian Raymor <Brian.Raymor@microsoft.com> Fri, 10 June 2016 21:03 UTC

Return-Path: <Brian.Raymor@microsoft.com>
X-Original-To: webpush@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: webpush@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E771912D946 for <webpush@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Jun 2016 14:03:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.003
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.003 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=microsoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hvlbOj08D0py for <webpush@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Jun 2016 14:03:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from na01-by2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-by2on0112.outbound.protection.outlook.com [207.46.100.112]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EEE3612D734 for <webpush@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 Jun 2016 14:03:47 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=OOCWIDoyl1tK8r2QU1OvrXpyHhtRofEqUF0FA4X6vcI=; b=a4+MgFvmrww47FkJKItF6u86ALGJxMcef0Suq2k0YZAmjfw+YPT5Dn75pO2YdkHSjLsH4lSf0SMOBtR0sCJgvk5VOLI+SJhaNyunN5xifGqcMIHO9YnzZwDdH0F5aO2vaNSWLuWrZ38HRJbAELLdQcjZrmDbLe+9OJGQNP8iWbk=
Received: from CO2PR03MB2407.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.166.93.137) by CO2PR03MB2407.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.166.93.137) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P384) id 15.1.517.8; Fri, 10 Jun 2016 21:03:46 +0000
Received: from CO2PR03MB2407.namprd03.prod.outlook.com ([10.166.93.137]) by CO2PR03MB2407.namprd03.prod.outlook.com ([10.166.93.137]) with mapi id 15.01.0517.005; Fri, 10 Jun 2016 21:03:46 +0000
From: Brian Raymor <Brian.Raymor@microsoft.com>
To: Brian Raymor <Brian.Raymor@microsoft.com>, Benjamin Bangert <bbangert@mozilla.com>
Thread-Topic: [Webpush] Different status codes for negative Push Message Receipts
Thread-Index: AQHRwEa5vUhTLLwUUEWQzOHJmCGu/Z/eo8FggAAPjQCAAwqd8IABd0GQ
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2016 21:03:46 +0000
Message-ID: <CO2PR03MB24070A35A8CAF68D340E2EC183500@CO2PR03MB2407.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
References: <CAN+BUJpZCHsAbf+6GOatOdw6Mq4R2asrKVjiOpivavCANLYMsA@mail.gmail.com> <BN3PR03MB2403FF7DAF6F11A6EA8FD2A4835D0@BN3PR03MB2403.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> <CABp8EuK=dYYD+mKc_=OWHbNRq-MLcg_XEOHg=_Y9Cm6OF8Gngg@mail.gmail.com> <CO2PR03MB24077717D90CFFF854430EE4835F0@CO2PR03MB2407.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <CO2PR03MB24077717D90CFFF854430EE4835F0@CO2PR03MB2407.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=Brian.Raymor@microsoft.com;
x-originating-ip: [24.16.23.27]
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: fe20f6a2-c58e-4a0b-c6c5-08d39172b6c4
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; CO2PR03MB2407; 6:SGSEK6ooCP+D4ZIIhkyG5lMok4HGCjkWTn2+95FDEKbRvBKfAEk90jfJfKFZIKC9CuYs3FBM1ivIr+730U25fFDSbR2kOUlAwl3W4mbyvPG1wOOjLgCRl25eMIvmNa5tPw5xGbSGuD+md1dYKHFTS0uLWu/qHaXYVS9ckcLXVxawVrH6z4cIqMeZuel/sNOmUIQ5gp0qG8XxMqacq744J3eksSV9R5nb5j//53ZRBDTa7yvtpvN55OJwr9HGEJlK2hBYyA4UstrJSrpmHQyCBhLBMTGcbXQtaX3vTuyXu1Fv6fNxYOTTMcssYtRy46Vd; 5:jXk5EuKChucDlRzBLxsP6W6vq1o5R0H3G4cs+TCc1xzUW1uH4mgcgQWChDpHq27FnOtetAxyZNF9ZusJy1to1QmIbItJ5JBn+qTdyKLGBNgGsW+w71W4lIR7Els4e+SQl78lg15gxi+QOCujmRxTOA==; 24:adFuAHw7COerHDyu+4F2vbBUHZb6oEm58hXRrufd+V7C+osUa0H5nrWR+6NXIUaw9FiQlx2RgCkHFRrq9UL/5PH+L5e9SZcSumw1Ta12Uj4=; 7:4pc06x66FTCQWSZkMBffktLYs27vyjtaQr+Q9hcWowEITsNoh9Nattrt/gou0vtxHMsElIJSdFMKXXwEJWb1k5mLqhtA1uiq2ZtuwdYmV1tMOLdY2K45HbomdyDtlulxNdtEwpqfn8oAUsTCQ4r1ZzPqWhUnPcYQTg8smVOapGgOKS3V4PuPTL1zQjjt8phejnsHsDDpHeZJmU4qKidjxbTupmcqdzwPbsBJ3Gw2TfQ=
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:CO2PR03MB2407;
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <CO2PR03MB2407C09F4B4E2DA94F0F450883500@CO2PR03MB2407.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(166708455590820);
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(61425038)(601004)(2401047)(8121501046)(5005006)(3002001)(10201501046)(6055026)(61426038)(61427038); SRVR:CO2PR03MB2407; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:CO2PR03MB2407;
x-forefront-prvs: 096943F07A
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(7916002)(13464003)(189002)(24454002)(377454003)(199003)(12063002)(106116001)(74316001)(54356999)(101416001)(122556002)(8990500004)(19580405001)(10710500007)(68736007)(76176999)(2906002)(5005710100001)(5002640100001)(19580395003)(10290500002)(2561002)(50986999)(2420400007)(10400500002)(10090500001)(4326007)(105586002)(15975445007)(99286002)(1511001)(5003600100002)(9686002)(97736004)(77096005)(92566002)(5001770100001)(106356001)(6116002)(8936002)(11100500001)(93886004)(3280700002)(189998001)(86612001)(33656002)(2421001)(5008740100001)(3660700001)(87936001)(81166006)(7110500001)(81156014)(3846002)(2900100001)(76576001)(8676002)(2950100001)(102836003)(66066001)(86362001)(15650500001)(586003)(5004730100002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:CO2PR03MB2407; H:CO2PR03MB2407.namprd03.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1; CAT:NONE; LANG:en; CAT:NONE;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: microsoft.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: microsoft.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 10 Jun 2016 21:03:46.6457 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 72f988bf-86f1-41af-91ab-2d7cd011db47
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: CO2PR03MB2407
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/webpush/4mm3M-2515RdBngnnOq_OSCxrGA>
Cc: Idel Pivnitskiy <idel.pivnitskiy@gmail.com>, "webpush@ietf.org" <webpush@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Webpush] Different status codes for negative Push Message Receipts
X-BeenThere: webpush@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of potential IETF work on a web push protocol <webpush.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/webpush>, <mailto:webpush-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/webpush/>
List-Post: <mailto:webpush@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:webpush-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/webpush>, <mailto:webpush-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2016 21:03:50 -0000

Closed https://github.com/webpush-wg/webpush-protocol/issues/110


-----Original Message-----
From: Webpush [mailto:webpush-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Brian Raymor
Sent: Thursday, June 9, 2016 4:05 PM
To: Benjamin Bangert <bbangert@mozilla.com>
Cc: webpush@ietf.org; Idel Pivnitskiy <idel.pivnitskiy@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Webpush] Different status codes for negative Push Message Receipts


We've struggled mightily in the past to identify the best status codes for these scenarios, including:

* New status codes for webpush
* 5xx status codes
* Using 417 and Expect
* Acknowledgement-Data

A sample of related conversations:

http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/webpush/current/msg00351.html
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/webpush/current/msg00362.html
https://github.com/webpush-wg/webpush-protocol/issues/17
https://github.com/webpush-wg/webpush-protocol/issues/42
https://github.com/webpush-wg/webpush-protocol/issues/49

It's my impression that we comprehensively exhausted the topic prior to WGLC unless there are new scenarios
to address.

Thoughts?

...Brian

-----Original Message-----
From: Benjamin Bangert [mailto:bbangert@mozilla.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 7, 2016 5:09 PM
To: Brian Raymor <Brian.Raymor@microsoft.com>
Cc: Idel Pivnitskiy <idel.pivnitskiy@gmail.com>om>; webpush@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Webpush] Different status codes for negative Push Message Receipts

I have also added comments to the issue, would it be more appropriate
to discuss it here?

On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 4:15 PM, Brian Raymor <Brian.Raymor@microsoft.com> wrote:
> On Monday, June 6, 2016 3:56 PM, Idel Pivnitskiy <idel.pivnitskiy@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I've created an issue on GitHub, related to this discussion:
>> https://github.com/webpush-wg/webpush-protocol/issues/110
>> Could be useful for an AS to know what happened with push message / UA.
>
>
> I’ve added my comments to the issue.
>
> Thanks,
> ...Brian
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Webpush mailing list
> Webpush@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/webpush
_______________________________________________
Webpush mailing list
Webpush@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/webpush

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email