Re: [Webpush] WGLC for draft-ietf-webpush-encryption-08

Peter Beverloo <beverloo@google.com> Mon, 08 May 2017 16:56 UTC

Return-Path: <beverloo@google.com>
X-Original-To: webpush@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: webpush@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD485128D44 for <webpush@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 May 2017 09:56:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.701
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.701 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id u7pW9npVmMgF for <webpush@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 May 2017 09:56:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yw0-x22f.google.com (mail-yw0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c05::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E91CB1200F1 for <webpush@ietf.org>; Mon, 8 May 2017 09:56:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yw0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id 203so32391372ywe.0 for <webpush@ietf.org>; Mon, 08 May 2017 09:56:27 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=ozZrYPHC/Wo4AmsKDaSn+8MyURWnHQzrFpknQnYPVnM=; b=pud2oJBzUrneCi/8AJ95uuysvstsWwBEqzUHpKjtHhD3z5f7gNZLD1Q1US7oNs60h6 avQ/MxCMLofvgr+1wqGjR4t0r9bTdiomeieLMEZyDXcGvcxbPy12KZ55n3wHkCz1sCOK Tg0LazmiRvDeAcKZNon+z8gDq02mC1PsUc8+6rXyfGKoo554K/rnO12enx37wHXQEnkT NnYfW5nUYF6JLQwSkAQ6DpmTvxpn88/VZdB+/af9X+gMtbVe6HGUFzxvjUqVpy99jb9p LQNGJzXPJzrd9G6GxE5ByeQNmj50OwA6hvdBQ7mljdsKDB9/+gL0ZBjyRnLSxMi35Vcd pRww==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=ozZrYPHC/Wo4AmsKDaSn+8MyURWnHQzrFpknQnYPVnM=; b=QWF8W3QOtJ6dEjyXufx0Rb8K2wkDZGjNSZxwyCEQ1MMvuJAW68zZB8d7j1fzZR4Asv VxBAYF49AOeQUkCRcjOnLdvuyyffbl4+hN5CTGA1AToSoiccasjx0w/v9yTYDcS1EveS MCdDohTDJEpMbVcKdJXIkwx/y2gCYJ9ARsbI81nckh2sFGymROuuH5qhpLcK3MSNhqIn w6Rqda/81fSnIaO0YfjcMvNqGaIg7IfR1VuFGO6y7SlRjG9aNipDd6wWlX6v+2f/Zqsn wK58QAgqzioTJ7OQ4TC59n2YOiZLky9u5ZHrdUcdpZ1tCIQDWagTAzOEcaaoWg1Buj9R WzPA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AN3rC/52zqj3AgA0gMJv8sWwe8yeFUcZNqKQQRHQj0M7Y+xYhGzgGEny 5pGkGB35fbxMfs76/UGPr8I2OrkTrggk
X-Received: by 10.129.131.211 with SMTP id t202mr20532383ywf.107.1494262587150; Mon, 08 May 2017 09:56:27 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.129.26.1 with HTTP; Mon, 8 May 2017 09:56:26 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CABkgnnXD9u48qpXFL94v4A0DBAHLOxQ7HFJFTcJSEg9HzgFMgg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABF6JR0-dvEp4+cF7qp89UYevoA_PZ56L8R0OvtiBHL+NLqw3w@mail.gmail.com> <CABkgnnXD9u48qpXFL94v4A0DBAHLOxQ7HFJFTcJSEg9HzgFMgg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Peter Beverloo <beverloo@google.com>
Date: Mon, 08 May 2017 17:56:26 +0100
Message-ID: <CALt3x6nMTBOQad1Vcb4uWD2ZvPw_YD-_o0g4epJfsmdxjbT13A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Cc: Phil Sorber <sorber@apache.org>, "webpush@ietf.org" <webpush@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c07a516b5b1ed054f061e3f"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/webpush/5UmnBVvJQuogB1m5dtGqr1-UxuM>
Subject: Re: [Webpush] WGLC for draft-ietf-webpush-encryption-08
X-BeenThere: webpush@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of potential IETF work on a web push protocol <webpush.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/webpush>, <mailto:webpush-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/webpush/>
List-Post: <mailto:webpush@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:webpush-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/webpush>, <mailto:webpush-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 May 2017 16:56:30 -0000

+1

The draft looks great to me, thank you for driving this Martin! I sent a PR
with a few editorial suggestions. I've verified the example and will
provide an implementation of the draft for Chrome.

Thanks,
Peter

On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 7:25 AM, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Aside from thinking that this is ready (author bias notwithstanding),
> if you want to send nits (or open issues), the draft is on github
> here:
>
> https://github.com/webpush-wg/webpush-encryption
>
> I'd be happy to take an input there.
>
> On 26 April 2017 at 08:04, Phil Sorber <sorber@apache.org> wrote:
> > 2. If you only find nits, they can be sent directly to the author(s)
>
> _______________________________________________
> Webpush mailing list
> Webpush@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/webpush
>