IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Webpush] Receipt subscription follow-up

Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Tue, 26 April 2016 05:23 UTC

Return-Path: <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: webpush@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: webpush@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CCCC12D09B for <webpush@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Apr 2016 22:23:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TVeY7ah7OuO2 for <webpush@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Apr 2016 22:23:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io0-x233.google.com (mail-io0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3C66E12B017 for <webpush@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Apr 2016 22:23:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io0-x233.google.com with SMTP id f89so6114485ioi.0 for <webpush@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Apr 2016 22:23:04 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc; bh=dU5pSahiDMKxLZFjF/yKXibKHXVBme9kggG8++HTNPw=; b=Jk0zcGG6Yhl24iaIC/Ez55d4M7Sz42/yw51t19rfqEqb9bTbQsVMMV92M530fUcHYD b8N+vup9pCWl9+jUGf9VNla3MJmjNwxBzdUJyu9Q3R52gZku8mPwdebRIr6OgvS2ZOua fjekwjOdPdKYwbGuVpcSmyb/LtaOcBv+87L1/ntA/mpK58i6S9u5sfKjqne9WsbaY9w4 XqxHTvnznNKM4zFmsC/W+u7ApuZeySbudbnlvR3B0bW5xrie8Pun+PGcgNoim7j+qMDn KTTsuJ0XUt/n4p7yCEQqfFKid7KcC8zVVZhzPfb52uwVfyC1OAS3bZbp3cX8VWGbsbs1 iQMg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc; bh=dU5pSahiDMKxLZFjF/yKXibKHXVBme9kggG8++HTNPw=; b=TVXMtFmXFmzxouf1PuzGl7q3HcJBQBHEk65BDwcKOZ21oXN6ICwZYyqjFZUveGMWQF oRnIfEOeGnRiCNgJR9dx3Ul0y+5ROIPbRQ7MLtNXr36KL47fVNMKuh404IlnLJHnw3SR SwJLsAfLQrNDzlW0hD2y/ANMNDom4+A298mxVWYxgF38JLJwZwxSuvvVcaGIcFEbwkYJ W80rn0M7gilEUn44UUhI9ilZhzkZ6x59/OHmEkKxRHab3wSIajv5BO+5gjY8i0FEWDuI ndr/N3U77LfhhV/wyKD/e2UEBxGso4j69Ti+J2F833fK4OHVs8bniIXgyuWjnQuhy3N8 +NBA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FUUpFBSM3WQRiQb3qzvKOXHujpK2oS0LnY8PEhKfstWJQItw9dGo8LNIUlT7PFIaA2/lMis8qvU5hTUxg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.107.59.85 with SMTP id i82mr735231ioa.108.1461648183722; Mon, 25 Apr 2016 22:23:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.36.43.82 with HTTP; Mon, 25 Apr 2016 22:23:03 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAP8-FqmcguLQaVxeNs1ROAG0XEBgYNtDiJ3+sYUcxmRrFfou1Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABkgnnXKDZvLWxkhFP0R4jW=ZyFwqiqQREFA5BFKH9i4PQCmyA@mail.gmail.com> <CAP8-Fq=Oi_kGebcRsyHYQdXWwLxFQxFwR=jeOyKS-+vW7eE=0w@mail.gmail.com> <CABkgnnX35n3K=cGTC2EvwG3=w6X7uWCikw+QFqhO7-RiLV8zJQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAP8-FqmcguLQaVxeNs1ROAG0XEBgYNtDiJ3+sYUcxmRrFfou1Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2016 15:23:03 +1000
Message-ID: <CABkgnnUvimZ8z6XZBpKobjfp3R_WudV=ienXR-DH8B7Li98v0A@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
To: Costin Manolache <costin@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/webpush/6m9rHPsRdZyaim6JkNkpF4kNNt8>
Cc: "webpush@ietf.org" <webpush@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Webpush] Receipt subscription follow-up
X-BeenThere: webpush@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of potential IETF work on a web push protocol <webpush.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/webpush>, <mailto:webpush-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/webpush/>
List-Post: <mailto:webpush@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:webpush-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/webpush>, <mailto:webpush-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2016 05:23:07 -0000

On 26 April 2016 at 15:18, Costin Manolache <costin@gmail.com> wrote:
> You mean an AS having multiple instances would use a different
> receipt set for each instance ?

More likely one per data center/region.  An application "server" might
want to ensure that receipts go to the DC that generated the push
message.

> That may be problematic for many
> reasons - like load balancing, queuing, AS server restarts.

Acknowledged.  Most of those just fall into the "stuff we deal with
when writing software at scale" bucket though.

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email