[Webpush] Rejecting messages < 4K? (WAS Re: Non-blocking comments on -05)
Brian Raymor <Brian.Raymor@microsoft.com> Fri, 03 June 2016 17:04 UTC
Return-Path: <Brian.Raymor@microsoft.com>
X-Original-To: webpush@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: webpush@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E28512D740
for <webpush@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Jun 2016 10:04:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.003
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.003 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001,
RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001]
autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
header.d=microsoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id bLzjnT-goZGq for <webpush@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Fri, 3 Jun 2016 10:04:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from na01-by2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com
(mail-by2on0124.outbound.protection.outlook.com [207.46.100.124])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C823A12D746
for <webpush@ietf.org>; Fri, 3 Jun 2016 10:04:08 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com;
s=selector1; h=From:To:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version;
bh=TX1yOAugNOkjxO1ZkfKg0065KQrf+EGHGeKnrdGB2TY=;
b=SrgUXaHX0DTRkobzm7RHhALSrsqOW64UgkuAfdgJTixt5K43uJs4JKMpMCq3FopgyxZzJBdSXHXi42BV/MRencDXVGyN6NimU7YP/8ZgPnDMMpeludAyCWefplmZ8K8WvHhrFlZz0Pyzh7fHQIPBNGbnJTK0YMPH96QqGK5OZfY=
Received: from CO2PR03MB2407.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.166.93.137) by
CO2PR03MB2407.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.166.93.137) with Microsoft SMTP
Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P384) id
15.1.506.9; Fri, 3 Jun 2016 17:04:07 +0000
Received: from CO2PR03MB2407.namprd03.prod.outlook.com ([10.166.93.137]) by
CO2PR03MB2407.namprd03.prod.outlook.com ([10.166.93.137]) with mapi id
15.01.0506.011; Fri, 3 Jun 2016 17:04:07 +0000
From: Brian Raymor <Brian.Raymor@microsoft.com>
To: "webpush@ietf.org" <webpush@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Rejecting messages < 4K? (WAS Re: [Webpush] Non-blocking
comments on -05)
Thread-Index: AdG9uHv/UzV61crjSIiwm/f0msling==
Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2016 17:04:07 +0000
Message-ID: <CO2PR03MB24075CA1B4E7B3BDD38D76D783590@CO2PR03MB2407.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: ietf.org; dkim=none (message not signed)
header.d=none;ietf.org; dmarc=none action=none header.from=microsoft.com;
x-originating-ip: [50.233.197.250]
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: eb3a9468-0771-4075-d8c5-08d38bd11314
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; CO2PR03MB2407;
5:qISYw2ZsDtoiEdo0tL7J5C0oUXIPCEHaUJJ/n7GcDdGrxMgJFlom4jI22IMWCRX8JvbXgdGFFdUH4Nlk0Sl5v8E9fhf0anyk1XfASssMmZ/lLX5jy+5bXBkEws5HvY7y0zRllcTLSX9zyrIrUwziiw==;
24:jxy09qBL8VliyDXy+gyXdwVmID9ni98OhXzxtTOKHe1X5QXRJ4dXiEofKqU2Z6N83MMvlHB8cJCDmYWI6HZs81iQxdGiTtNfNbK8Gtq1EeY=;
7:E5LJjpMSyf8tJYxekXmEbXdWwPklZqgZOGWh4jiWjsE0YPZzjg0GWBpaA/McUomcJEhuvpbqAP/5iSpXLM3TiwAgUlsblirP0iH43XBoQatQuydFsbYANiBYADuKoJOxvddmJOKUROEoam377MiD9mFdWh2E7tvYEKQbwvhk7h3LyOhzZjRrTi+3tsDkQ61GUpEVVtVd6zItupGDpB3tBtZuVa+hVsOiBAsRGM+k+TvpXr8miIUGwNPMn/2QS6ED
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:CO2PR03MB2407;
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <CO2PR03MB24074A7209A5F5698239C30B83590@CO2PR03MB2407.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(158342451672863);
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0;
RULEID:(61425038)(601004)(2401047)(5005006)(8121501046)(10201501046)(3002001)(6055026)(61426038)(61427038);
SRVR:CO2PR03MB2407; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:CO2PR03MB2407;
x-forefront-prvs: 0962D394D2
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM;
SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(377454003)(74316001)(8936002)(6116002)(102836003)(586003)(99286002)(5002640100001)(11100500001)(3846002)(19580395003)(2900100001)(1730700003)(2501003)(76576001)(19580405001)(450100001)(77096005)(5004730100002)(2906002)(81166006)(8676002)(122556002)(107886002)(50986999)(3280700002)(15650500001)(33656002)(110136002)(54356999)(5008740100001)(10290500002)(189998001)(5003600100002)(5005710100001)(10090500001)(86362001)(2351001)(229853001)(9686002)(66066001)(10400500002)(5640700001)(92566002)(87936001)(3660700001);
DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:CO2PR03MB2407;
H:CO2PR03MB2407.namprd03.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; MLV:sfv; LANG:en;
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:23
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: microsoft.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 03 Jun 2016 17:04:07.0805 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 72f988bf-86f1-41af-91ab-2d7cd011db47
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: CO2PR03MB2407
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/webpush/7HQtWJtfV9QtyabebnC8_EGxNWA>
Subject: [Webpush] Rejecting messages < 4K? (WAS Re: Non-blocking comments
on -05)
X-BeenThere: webpush@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of potential IETF work on a web push protocol
<webpush.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/webpush>,
<mailto:webpush-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/webpush/>
List-Post: <mailto:webpush@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:webpush-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/webpush>,
<mailto:webpush-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2016 17:04:13 -0000
For easier discussion and tracking, I'm calling out this suggestion with a more specific subject line. On Thursday, June 2, 2016 12:02 AM, Kit Cambridge <kcambridge@mozilla.com> suggested: > In section 7.2, could we consider allowing push servers to reject messages < 4k? > If the PS is proxying the message to a third-party server, which Mozilla's server does on iOS and Android, it might not be able to control the size limit. On Friday, June 3, 2016 7:56 AM, Costin Manolache <costin@gmail.com> seconded: > +1 This change would simply eliminate this requirement: Push services MUST NOT return a 413 status code in responses to an entity body that is 4k (4096 bytes) or less in size. Martin - this was in your first draft. Any concerns? ...Brian
- [Webpush] Rejecting messages < 4K? (WAS Re: Non-b… Brian Raymor