IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Webpush] Niceness or urgency of messages #28

Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Sat, 20 February 2016 02:34 UTC

Return-Path: <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: webpush@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: webpush@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7B8F1B330D for <webpush@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Feb 2016 18:34:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TFcml_aQ3Aju for <webpush@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Feb 2016 18:34:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ig0-x231.google.com (mail-ig0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5B3AF1A1A00 for <webpush@ietf.org>; Fri, 19 Feb 2016 18:34:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ig0-x231.google.com with SMTP id y8so52087411igp.0 for <webpush@ietf.org>; Fri, 19 Feb 2016 18:34:27 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=XtltC7zTKD+xaZThrhj3TiYUVtZOWPUHEiHoCysx8ms=; b=cqXnmLerTLmJiSQUQuSbtH48RFDcyrfj0nKMPamsdLr7dwsod2SZe6NDsFD9lB1szk R/+mjdwHtEuLhIU1IVBVRPVlk/3MN5PUUcozykyHMBrSK0hpRnGQBXF26t88Zr9rNoJ/ DRT+Vz6H36K7iiny/KdDwnO7FHNxE8cEgs1wWj1NzNRnVND6Y90BHJFOlWHhvvM/1f6P 0yj+VvkBJlsteL+ld3HzG4XhfutyeofAoQ0WQf5fH5r5+GglpmSxfbus/Eknogs0M/sm oFE9O6TnC4XdG279WVJQ5Y2B6FVhA/EbYmYGireXH9x1OABjn0gAotTnIBP+dYWTtfsC sGPw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=XtltC7zTKD+xaZThrhj3TiYUVtZOWPUHEiHoCysx8ms=; b=PQF68FY/Ox2L/ZqzHMBdK0atPs9nSWwjEjPTwNT9TStdA5IpdNw+gYx+NvC6l1Ov2p glUR5f4bxzMNIJ0gZrzrlkre4nBDiUeIH4jes+pVxZ/lYlH1k7NM18DpkVFLDJVE3fk6 US11EexP6Ajfmsv6ORiYPUhjoedpIfVZbxBmb7WwVUkW+x++slD2mk0p1f9dKoF3c5cI jbGb4wTO91OfmcCNsvt57rJ/oG9VZcauTWnYzG1QNVo54M5vxNG1wJeLAZLES7gpdtIO UTC8uQPLnaRLDJEaDqbWHR3imo1GeWXhgey38PWrJRTzqBPhNk3PUn2s5U10Uy5Mn9iU qKMg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOTeuTL4AsBnAzSI3nvVNNMRapAuS0JrN0OcQ8g9agl6gGuwBoPSiXv5E9Bvhs3mDtr1oVVPbQr75T9Anw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.50.20.73 with SMTP id l9mr287753ige.58.1455935666809; Fri, 19 Feb 2016 18:34:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.36.53.79 with HTTP; Fri, 19 Feb 2016 18:34:26 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <BY2PR0301MB064784ED9A344BB1BF50D10B83A10@BY2PR0301MB0647.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
References: <BY2PR0301MB064784ED9A344BB1BF50D10B83A10@BY2PR0301MB0647.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2016 18:34:26 -0800
Message-ID: <CABkgnnXMpLiXFd7EgHq1DvGQ88SAVbn=0+YFDS1FHA3pvS8P=A@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
To: Brian Raymor <Brian.Raymor@microsoft.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/webpush/7xiOnmJiRyQTSOlmWESvYDZRAy8>
Cc: "webpush@ietf.org" <webpush@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Webpush] Niceness or urgency of messages #28
X-BeenThere: webpush@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of potential IETF work on a web push protocol <webpush.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/webpush>, <mailto:webpush-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/webpush/>
List-Post: <mailto:webpush@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:webpush-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/webpush>, <mailto:webpush-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2016 02:34:28 -0000

Thanks for putting this together Brian.

I think that this would be easier to explain if the numbers were
switched for tokens.  Maybe: high, normal, low, super-dooper-low.
(Similar values are defined for the now-defunct Priority field for
mail, apart from the last).

Also, I think that it might pay to note that this header field is not
forwarded to user agents.

On 19 February 2016 at 17:44, Brian Raymor <Brian.Raymor@microsoft.com> wrote:
>
> I've create a first draft of changes for https://github.com/webpush-wg/webpush-protocol/issues/28. The pull request is available for review at - https://github.com/webpush-wg/webpush-protocol/pull/78
>
> ...Brian
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Webpush mailing list
> Webpush@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/webpush

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email