Re: [Webpush] Niceness or urgency of messages #28
Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Sat, 20 February 2016 06:48 UTC
Return-Path: <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: webpush@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: webpush@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97EC81B38F2
for <webpush@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Feb 2016 22:48:11 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9,
DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1,
FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id L-I99kUe62RZ for <webpush@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Fri, 19 Feb 2016 22:48:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-io0-x235.google.com (mail-io0-x235.google.com
[IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::235])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CDB531B3953
for <webpush@ietf.org>; Fri, 19 Feb 2016 22:48:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-io0-x235.google.com with SMTP id 9so131867350iom.1
for <webpush@ietf.org>; Fri, 19 Feb 2016 22:48:09 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
:cc:content-type;
bh=6Fz7ySUTJghJNinbtctTS0L9oE1HiDos3VY36ViJt2o=;
b=05hQv1cHN0k8aNqaMGFrPSkFu81JLhngoZSV5/TtSl+EWqwrxHoxgxMikvraRghdRR
WAID4esOh5X2WEgZ/6IX5Phu16JPszA5/ztKcVD/ZViNP53SmwmIWE9kJyNwjKy2aPVH
kybaEDmJxkIonVBhMPaiDjcvXwKxW1vvDTgbWBAEpLZOG1YxZ6TUPRwT0I/AvYweJEtm
x/tOSAMND1ypjkmXsCluWdgHZ4OoD7yjHvJfDCTXa/MY8zGs4lyZ3cZjK7BMzfPybTGb
H9E+fno3m6fUJxhh0D8Gj1eciLdsVBvhLF/ZU7e3jNZ9fsKW6EdVaH+W0TEdoSzaSp+z
kmBQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type;
bh=6Fz7ySUTJghJNinbtctTS0L9oE1HiDos3VY36ViJt2o=;
b=ZqBp/nGekZT3ADLxUnDriq3087iOZHeEYMkVunboz9bJ5u5Lwnf9LIMZcJjR+0aT5P
Eg5i20KK+tL8jXkZ76huOswhIeC8Y3YnWK5gr6xXsJGsiUW45Vz6mgS85nEZERaXKqAf
2BzVM1bpBMkOxP9PukCUr8qfkmw5vxXrZ4PnOheCQenlxDZ0rJX4QAohibrefYogIi3H
JwG2wKTb8pNqgaA3bfVN/bY4fHUH9l9bEI6v3+QRLZgRyVj1mPdpgRCapa0BStTiic5/
+abThPdMuoMYfGoRY+lfDpmlZlN5DwgpOgtmICTINfx3Jl7e8jFUGhAmLvZw7VTDosR8
rYkQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YORlcY7BeR/yxpPAivfV5lhH4sqX70YGMTOjmFtEm5lFkBosH/q+ww6gJyte2/T9XXJblQkHQYxk4CaDQg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.107.41.133 with SMTP id p127mr6097395iop.100.1455950889291;
Fri, 19 Feb 2016 22:48:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.36.53.79 with HTTP; Fri, 19 Feb 2016 22:48:09 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <BY2PR0301MB0647DF1FD1AA7978EC35ACD183A10@BY2PR0301MB0647.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
References: <BY2PR0301MB064784ED9A344BB1BF50D10B83A10@BY2PR0301MB0647.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
<CABkgnnXMpLiXFd7EgHq1DvGQ88SAVbn=0+YFDS1FHA3pvS8P=A@mail.gmail.com>
<BY2PR0301MB0647DF1FD1AA7978EC35ACD183A10@BY2PR0301MB0647.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2016 22:48:09 -0800
Message-ID: <CABkgnnXxkt8CuuQPcGgVU9cKPvzodDfQsPNH=hg8p4xPFNvCOQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
To: Brian Raymor <Brian.Raymor@microsoft.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/webpush/8hvyW06u4sjtqsgLiTvrkHUVm7o>
Cc: "webpush@ietf.org" <webpush@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Webpush] Niceness or urgency of messages #28
X-BeenThere: webpush@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of potential IETF work on a web push protocol
<webpush.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/webpush>,
<mailto:webpush-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/webpush/>
List-Post: <mailto:webpush@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:webpush-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/webpush>,
<mailto:webpush-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2016 06:48:11 -0000
Ordering is easy: define the order. On 19 February 2016 at 22:00, Brian Raymor <Brian.Raymor@microsoft.com> wrote: > but this provoked similar concerns about the need for "explicit statement[s] about the ordering of these values" and: > > "This constant use of specific English words rather than numeric values is > causing the protocol and its processing to become less efficient and is > leading to complications in the definition ..." > > http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sip/current/msg01441.html > > Unfortunately, I could not find a response for the rest of the discussion. I'm definitely open to suggestions about the best way to ensure that this is clear to implementers. That is usually a sign that the mail was not taken seriously. We use string-based enumerations all the time today. They have great extensibility properties, they read well (though mostly for English speakers, I will conceded), and they don't cost any significant amount to implement.
- [Webpush] Niceness or urgency of messages #28 Brian Raymor
- Re: [Webpush] Niceness or urgency of messages #28 Martin Thomson
- Re: [Webpush] Niceness or urgency of messages #28 Brian Raymor
- Re: [Webpush] Niceness or urgency of messages #28 Martin Thomson
- Re: [Webpush] Niceness or urgency of messages #28 Brian Raymor