IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Webpush] When UA should send an acknowledgement?

Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Wed, 08 June 2016 02:34 UTC

Return-Path: <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: webpush@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: webpush@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDDAE12D7E1 for <webpush@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Jun 2016 19:34:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cZ4NYeJbDiWO for <webpush@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Jun 2016 19:34:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qg0-x22e.google.com (mail-qg0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c04::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6F1AD12D625 for <webpush@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Jun 2016 19:34:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qg0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id 93so68188806qgx.2 for <webpush@ietf.org>; Tue, 07 Jun 2016 19:34:57 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=yGPt3YWV522ERqcBKtrfKwFPixATuqihzK0NMxbTh9c=; b=mp2xBRRlm9uPR2mc75KqHqd4uTXN3yi8zwCl51cfQy215He7xQCXEZJPugervc/h/8 MHeNMr/yMcFrPe5GlZUHlHFad6Cgy+jo/OBH1YZc1uH8a/uD5Tva0XkcgAh9tmq8FDYo K2bkjq7/ONkiaz+JQ5k+jSHcK6zMjg6RorMt9PH82yn//7yQaOksz3RBKDF2N29yZtno 52RgAYFlZn6dtJvuy78zfIf97iUlX7F3ij1KzA++hFUzUFva5knrPcgwN5jA7MkFBp0s 1n4xn2jgNEp4s0vehlvuE48J9QI2mwSD6sb9sCuA9z5Dg5Q/A9QlWthT3YhV/zSQelHE jX3w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=yGPt3YWV522ERqcBKtrfKwFPixATuqihzK0NMxbTh9c=; b=b6Dy/PXdiUAUFlTqb3Lwd/P+zi4+JxOz8rA+pvYh18jL5tCHjg9h4jq2JxYm/jUCBd 6/qX1iM9/P54YPRjiBcNf5ykoTVx8EJY3jmQ5gWFrk+msS0vZcLtCTT9cBZrCrApHS7r 8FwFs0+Q4qjv2cHl9jHOSaobJGChbbx521J6Bs4+NhFC7Ilbq/Ugc1LgzW4nB4DcFhN8 17MyfFL585+kGtgpnNMVaPqtBa/CcQL1ZaHZuWp++S7wPeI42Xf51ah2x3/sHwWK4NaZ /tq27ZOEcriLhhOcPvODWU6hn7NnalTtnPFwkUIKTkgURrlDSfMIOLz7f1g+XnQgsnia d18w==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tIOfBxI4Dshou3luArWkBNnsjJkGuaW3JydclTJkI86mDfG2n0YQR/y0nq1dRiSPZGHbBomsgupgpJxSQ==
X-Received: by 10.140.32.198 with SMTP id h64mr2380678qgh.53.1465353296450; Tue, 07 Jun 2016 19:34:56 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.140.104.110 with HTTP; Tue, 7 Jun 2016 19:34:56 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAN+BUJpdSB-HvT6VQzVcAPqzwb_pn=HzLOC3r4ntSKjDh3ffLA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAN+BUJpdSB-HvT6VQzVcAPqzwb_pn=HzLOC3r4ntSKjDh3ffLA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2016 12:34:56 +1000
Message-ID: <CABkgnnVSrKp8sf31qpBztp1FH=AQHFCoAH9XVQx6JyU4BoEQaQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Idel Pivnitskiy <idel.pivnitskiy@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/webpush/9e41YHCQ898op7fa3wLHnR3oBcc>
Cc: "webpush@ietf.org" <webpush@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Webpush] When UA should send an acknowledgement?
X-BeenThere: webpush@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of potential IETF work on a web push protocol <webpush.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/webpush>, <mailto:webpush-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/webpush/>
List-Post: <mailto:webpush@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:webpush-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/webpush>, <mailto:webpush-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2016 02:34:59 -0000

On 7 June 2016 at 09:02, Idel Pivnitskiy <idel.pivnitskiy@gmail.com> wrote:
> Just a question: When should UA send an acknowledgement? Immediately after
> receiving a push message or after decryption/decoding/processing a push
> message?

This is defined in
http://w3c.github.io/push-api/index.html#the-push-event  (Step 6.5.3
is the acknowledgment.)

What a user agent does with the message is outside this spec.

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email