Re: [Webpush] WGLC for draft-ietf-webpush-protocol (again)
Idel Pivnitskiy <idel.pivnitskiy@gmail.com> Tue, 05 July 2016 22:00 UTC
Return-Path: <idel.pivnitskiy@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: webpush@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: webpush@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1646012D0F7
for <webpush@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Jul 2016 15:00:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001]
autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id MUfbd6UlLIqU for <webpush@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Tue, 5 Jul 2016 15:00:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-it0-x22a.google.com (mail-it0-x22a.google.com
[IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::22a])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6261C12B05B
for <webpush@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Jul 2016 15:00:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-it0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id h190so94683525ith.1
for <webpush@ietf.org>; Tue, 05 Jul 2016 15:00:31 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
bh=/UcLkbfoZ4MndSPZUIJsANSuBAfUaDBQOLmn4HvgKXc=;
b=rCJAKFUpkABcfpTHWvzAXmtIie6B47W1QvOXrmmQgrKQ2tviBd9Q7dT9AzD86NXf0L
I1x3zkaRyopFlfueXt6tnzweMt5edBO/5Idy5M1DAIHff0+Y+N/eeyhnX9qqr/AVvfwW
S45utmiu0ywPy2aYXm0qaWAhyX1kqCcB0HClJy8rBFjzNfFnhDEWakjwl9BxbMh8J2mX
RVla9KVrPnoHuez33+CmjRCvcUXMAe06ORiiKyeF2IEvjyqnKTV394EmhHgLQGta64Ci
DfJLJyLGBmrcBnWRT+/uHKN0+86eOYCsYneZlxA1jYK9sduH4ctnaRXNsf51C3789zVy
7FoQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
:message-id:subject:to;
bh=/UcLkbfoZ4MndSPZUIJsANSuBAfUaDBQOLmn4HvgKXc=;
b=dnLOXNPe6tk4Kd7/SgY3ysdc56hjpnJ2ypeZGU+JS83RGDK/TLM03c3bOzzTyCPxDF
CyCo79/NBypbPY7ziis7c7GGlFmYL+37kfb81Or6AoiqdRUriK7JHQHRfo+GPM4Jzabo
gquy6306TQQl6w/H6nGIJ8/fTehRY+mz0IjdkpZ1oISPOy9M2cgbZYp8LsT2BrmG/Gm7
pFNAyUqOspeHkWBi5kOZBHyTax5tcCR0UzUamkkewXw/bgFic73MgrVfsOXDej+PRRMx
qDZhixwUtI6D/1/wusfO8ksN7TJDu7SwDDmtw2YjNaeIBpIxL8KkoBzViixiFjUOB0Bd
j4+A==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tKC2azS/osuqwanpWAESKXZlvWkRzjUI9Kk5S9it7ZXGKhMMY8sEmI2AaZGWclKeFj8MW8w0KFv1rw2WA==
X-Received: by 10.36.103.10 with SMTP id u10mr16854738itc.45.1467756030448;
Tue, 05 Jul 2016 15:00:30 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.36.40.84 with HTTP; Tue, 5 Jul 2016 14:59:51 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAP8-FqnEgfbDqOCrsv4ukb9R0XHU0mudPkBoWznSwr2JrOHDdQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <E7305E31-07A2-4B84-AA90-635AB97E46DF@ntt-at.com>
<fee55fa2-fbdf-b63e-7acb-b0b429deb0ff@mozilla.com>
<786718A2-C28D-436C-B91D-B3217F459F2E@mozilla.com>
<CABp8EuL6M39wCK4ZCDgN6O0Gi_GHJhBLR36L4KWb_9=Y=KaRGA@mail.gmail.com>
<CAP8-FqnEgfbDqOCrsv4ukb9R0XHU0mudPkBoWznSwr2JrOHDdQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Idel Pivnitskiy <idel.pivnitskiy@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2016 00:59:51 +0300
Message-ID: <CAN+BUJovrfURwrNr3OypwbZ4vqK5u-od2Ha1MzXUp7SHLm8RXQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: "webpush@ietf.org" <webpush@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a114a9d68cfdc260536ea945e
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/webpush/9hkkb74F65IRRxtArH3LYm-rAbg>
Subject: Re: [Webpush] WGLC for draft-ietf-webpush-protocol (again)
X-BeenThere: webpush@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of potential IETF work on a web push protocol
<webpush.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/webpush>,
<mailto:webpush-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/webpush/>
List-Post: <mailto:webpush@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:webpush-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/webpush>,
<mailto:webpush-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jul 2016 22:00:34 -0000
I support the draft. Just a little reminder of my non-blocker proposal, which was left without an answer or comments [1]. All of you worked hard! Highly appreciate quick answers and informative discussions in the mailing list and on GitHub. Thanks for all! [1] Define a list of headers, which must be transmitted to the UA: https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/webpush/current/msg00578.html Best regards, Idel Pivnitskiy -- Twitter: @idelpivnitskiy <https://twitter.com/idelpivnitskiy> GitHub: @idelpivnitskiy <https://github.com/idelpivnitskiy> On Sun, Jul 3, 2016 at 6:13 PM, Costin Manolache <costin@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 > > Costin > > On Fri, Jul 1, 2016, 9:19 PM Benjamin Bangert <bbangert@mozilla.com> > wrote: > >> I'm happy with the draft as-is. Thanks to the editors and chairs. >> >> Cheers, >> Ben >> >> On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 8:06 AM, Kit Cambridge <kcambridge@mozilla.com> >> wrote: >> >>> I support the draft, with gratitude to the editors and chairs for their >>> hard work. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> - kit >>> >>> >>> On Jun 23, 2016, at 5:23 PM, jr conlin <jconlin@mozilla.com> wrote: >>> >>> I have no additional concerns or requests for this protocol, and support >>> this draft. >>> >>> Huge thanks to the editors and contributors for their patience and >>> understanding. >>> >>> On 6/23/2016 12:58 AM, Shida Schubert wrote: >>> >>> All; >>> >>> As I noted on the e-mail I sent out on June 7th after the initial WGLC >>> for webpush protocol draft, we are commencing another WGLC as there are no >>> remaining issues on github AND the authors have produced the 06 version of >>> the draft reflecting all resolutions. >>> >>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-webpush-protocol-06 >>> >>> If you have any issues or questions regarding the draft please submit it >>> to the list, when raising issues please provide constructive resolution >>> whenever possible. >>> >>> PLEASE acknowledge on the list when you are content/happy with the >>> status of the draft and you see no issue passing it forward to IESG for >>> publication. >>> >>> The WGLC will conclude at the end of the day on July 8th PST. >>> >>> Shida >>> As co-chair >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Webpush mailing listWebpush@ietf.orghttps://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/webpush >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Webpush mailing list >>> Webpush@ietf.org >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/webpush >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Webpush mailing list >>> Webpush@ietf.org >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/webpush >>> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> Webpush mailing list >> Webpush@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/webpush >> > > _______________________________________________ > Webpush mailing list > Webpush@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/webpush > >
- Re: [Webpush] WGLC for draft-ietf-webpush-protoco… Shida Schubert
- Re: [Webpush] WGLC for draft-ietf-webpush-protoco… Idel Pivnitskiy
- Re: [Webpush] WGLC for draft-ietf-webpush-protoco… Elio Damaggio
- Re: [Webpush] WGLC for draft-ietf-webpush-protoco… Costin Manolache
- Re: [Webpush] WGLC for draft-ietf-webpush-protoco… Benjamin Bangert
- Re: [Webpush] WGLC for draft-ietf-webpush-protoco… Kit Cambridge
- Re: [Webpush] WGLC for draft-ietf-webpush-protoco… jr conlin
- Re: [Webpush] WGLC for draft-ietf-webpush-protoco… Peter Beverloo
- [Webpush] WGLC for draft-ietf-webpush-protocol (a… Shida Schubert