IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Webpush] Voluntary Application Server Identification -02

Peter Beverloo <beverloo@google.com> Mon, 01 February 2016 18:43 UTC

Return-Path: <beverloo@google.com>
X-Original-To: webpush@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: webpush@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38F161B341C for <webpush@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Feb 2016 10:43:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.379
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.379 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EKRjHdasB3H9 for <webpush@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Feb 2016 10:43:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lb0-x22c.google.com (mail-lb0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c04::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 799F61B33D0 for <webpush@ietf.org>; Mon, 1 Feb 2016 10:43:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lb0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id x4so81562385lbm.0 for <webpush@ietf.org>; Mon, 01 Feb 2016 10:43:10 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=inuYnBs3qo01zYY8jcYNDn55euzUA5M6MjXU88gFX/0=; b=ge1gBEqgdixl07UzTOKfQjjs0nxemnOLIGUpauNkxB1M9OGrrwx9B6nXiQOSmUdQC9 tJlnGFdQISZxLCFU9ArSkOGHr4Bal4eNtU92rJUHUgkDoHtF+SB7xmloRiA/V6Vmn+R+ femX5vP1jc8xYqWRhwc/FPQYLq8Ang7/1pTvayYPnyZHdSsiBoho5DqDtt7l0d1upE5L f9QCBT0zd+W/DIE6zzt/YJ01r4hy4pLxi9eP1qonSqKccuF56Cd4T9HMQcNKBc0FR2up H8cjw65JCL3oJYVj3Iv+5XtgUHyvGvQP8F7h3kIuMZmf9xjDiAYqZ12QkM44HPqcekge PSSQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=inuYnBs3qo01zYY8jcYNDn55euzUA5M6MjXU88gFX/0=; b=jgFk57hJQgcX+dG4E9Qkxkn+81nChZjW4zyhyNINCTa99HOUUpfnTZhmYO8kD6ToUU XON03Y1/SgUAFX0HEfMCtOmDug5GtknCCwD9FNz1MmHukfCnYe3Fbzxs87wn6zwkgYgg nGOJwI+Xe3CebkAP8OG3WjkT4el1HWRLNYJLlTojbnHYk/3cb7DDOM1oL09buOn7trA2 BZsCGsm/CjsNLuwDWr5R/u7KPzzOvbX7OuuVcF3ZlbXkwm3NQNdQRTWUK8TvzhT5HMIx ptSN0sQjYio6RgSsihhroclPyJKUgptgDsi+jZNpo2hRCBym+jdMeRGlScgUCKkUwhWW JqUA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOQeTib+umVADJT6HadUQk0Evz5Zi4m33IXeInJ1HTBtqywsLk0/rI9iN/8ghchbNlei6YQaGSk9/mdH3SLS
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.112.198.102 with SMTP id jb6mr9107377lbc.44.1454352188481; Mon, 01 Feb 2016 10:43:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.25.20.156 with HTTP; Mon, 1 Feb 2016 10:43:08 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CABkgnnXMA1do2jLoNuALz5V+416RELu=FWyEj8nExC+xn3vnpw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABkgnnXMA1do2jLoNuALz5V+416RELu=FWyEj8nExC+xn3vnpw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2016 18:43:08 +0000
Message-ID: <CALt3x6=T7+PDBRYfBeSNuCABi824Vpno9N+2Y7Jg=5pYUxBvCw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Peter Beverloo <beverloo@google.com>
To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c34aa8930a9e052ab9c1bc
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/webpush/BDhl7DLGGbj4KNvRTBF2aDw54UM>
Cc: "webpush@ietf.org" <webpush@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Webpush] Voluntary Application Server Identification -02
X-BeenThere: webpush@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of potential IETF work on a web push protocol <webpush.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/webpush>, <mailto:webpush-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/webpush/>
List-Post: <mailto:webpush@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:webpush-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/webpush>, <mailto:webpush-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Feb 2016 18:43:12 -0000

Thank you for publishing the draft, Martin!

While I'm not sure how much significance it carries since I'm listed as an
editor, I do of course support the draft as the resolve to Issue 44.

Server authentication and subscription association are important problems
to us, and, pending any further feedback from the working group, we plan to
adopt the proposed solution in our implementations.

Thanks,
Peter

On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 1:56 AM, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
wrote:

> I have just posted a new version of the draft, taking the recent
> feedback from discussions into account.
>
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-thomson-webpush-vapid-02
>
> This includes only the JWT option, with a lot more of the details
> fleshed out.  I've implemented it in order to create the example, and
> that is dead simple to do.
>
> I think that this is the answer we want for issue 44 [44].  Does the
> group agree? Is this worth adopting?
>
> [44] https://github.com/webpush-wg/webpush-protocol/issues/44
>
> _______________________________________________
> Webpush mailing list
> Webpush@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/webpush
>

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email