[Webpush] Different status codes for negative Push Message Receipts
Idel Pivnitskiy <idel.pivnitskiy@gmail.com> Mon, 06 June 2016 22:56 UTC
Return-Path: <idel.pivnitskiy@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: webpush@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: webpush@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC4BA12D1E0
for <webpush@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 6 Jun 2016 15:56:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001]
autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id VQtqTbJ5XMr7 for <webpush@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Mon, 6 Jun 2016 15:56:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-it0-x232.google.com (mail-it0-x232.google.com
[IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::232])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 33EDA12D140
for <webpush@ietf.org>; Mon, 6 Jun 2016 15:56:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-it0-x232.google.com with SMTP id i65so49531608ith.1
for <webpush@ietf.org>; Mon, 06 Jun 2016 15:56:46 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
bh=KWSGHEuJEaW8aZUl9DISwLr0YlnpRjGzxpEB2M5RP1Q=;
b=LqdjWfT/bZHwEiGSnLVpbzuvjVpwNU/yBU0FquJbfBXy2uHMZe7if2lzo3ly8mPeOM
dkimz1y2zpjUrCMxLDUikV9BCd3T4c3wNGqAAdl8tvNVNxfZyqCgBtncZ6Vez7MNGSdK
wduEORnqFXeiGbS5a/jdjn54Pjb3805oRqXRNI8rxvgRT3Ydraw9DeZ7EsOwWhssec91
ZSBbKUSDswCXfluRVsVAcO+gnAnAo65RMTTLtzjsn3EhjwzdzqBQmKkek8lLotKh+eS1
FB1DvoqFTXRwSehQk7E8YGruWT3mAVOS7ONcfldgzbQFzNv4MISVbA5P99zDwLHN6Wth
u+IA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
bh=KWSGHEuJEaW8aZUl9DISwLr0YlnpRjGzxpEB2M5RP1Q=;
b=SaWML/LJCJkrBcBnhUh8bDMxW5/A7vo3kw5IbukaF1oh2rL3qGfNQTeI+eqBB7f3H8
XAGf4TYIqaY2BXz2hJfTljt//zrUZ9dT00+5xD7MhLz0bGy6Cvk3YnM238Ji+vYDZE3b
kIW4sTdPObmzEODi7fGszlBcEMPPLmUrnCz845Ywyvw7O4kKWU9x0g1Q3Go8UAFLcD+u
lO6YNpyWxdVTwyHm6dMW7oAFGA/N15oEEl2csfeRLjzxpyDLrHNR+PUTMQRPNet+JW5C
/7avf0Os8TzJa9aih/NbUhCVYyg7DHS1y/xpWG9uHG0D3bs7oDw3ADzmf4ByMZvut71t
BmgA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tJKCUFhxbLXuEBHL/B0k/OoqaNXba56aBpfClh1Nk9r3lkE/qRwhknyoOuItbK/5fJHK1H0opdyZJmdJw==
X-Received: by 10.107.31.66 with SMTP id f63mr24696411iof.180.1465253805530;
Mon, 06 Jun 2016 15:56:45 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.36.152.131 with HTTP; Mon, 6 Jun 2016 15:56:06 -0700 (PDT)
From: Idel Pivnitskiy <idel.pivnitskiy@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2016 01:56:06 +0300
Message-ID: <CAN+BUJpZCHsAbf+6GOatOdw6Mq4R2asrKVjiOpivavCANLYMsA@mail.gmail.com>
To: webpush@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1140f8d495c4c40534a3fcf2
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/webpush/EqOiOPeQdzM2XSfdmWhqQI8pceE>
Subject: [Webpush] Different status codes for negative Push Message Receipts
X-BeenThere: webpush@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of potential IETF work on a web push protocol
<webpush.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/webpush>,
<mailto:webpush-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/webpush/>
List-Post: <mailto:webpush@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:webpush-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/webpush>,
<mailto:webpush-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2016 22:56:48 -0000
I've created an issue on GitHub, related to this discussion: https://github.com/webpush-wg/webpush-protocol/issues/110 Could be useful for an AS to know what happened with push message / UA. Best regards, Idel Pivnitskiy -- Twitter: @idelpivnitskiy <https://twitter.com/idelpivnitskiy> GitHub: @idelpivnitskiy <https://github.com/idelpivnitskiy>
- [Webpush] Different status codes for negative Pus… Idel Pivnitskiy
- Re: [Webpush] Different status codes for negative… Brian Raymor
- Re: [Webpush] Different status codes for negative… Benjamin Bangert
- Re: [Webpush] Different status codes for negative… Brian Raymor
- Re: [Webpush] Different status codes for negative… Brian Raymor