IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Webpush] Ben Campbell's Yes on draft-ietf-webpush-protocol-11: (with COMMENT)

"Ben Campbell" <ben@nostrum.com> Thu, 13 October 2016 00:51 UTC

Return-Path: <ben@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: webpush@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: webpush@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9CA9129654; Wed, 12 Oct 2016 17:51:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.896
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-2.996] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7-KNU4gmzUrm; Wed, 12 Oct 2016 17:51:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2F0121295DA; Wed, 12 Oct 2016 17:51:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.1.21] (cpe-66-25-7-22.tx.res.rr.com [66.25.7.22]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id u9D0pG4b075004 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 12 Oct 2016 19:51:17 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from ben@nostrum.com)
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host cpe-66-25-7-22.tx.res.rr.com [66.25.7.22] claimed to be [10.0.1.21]
From: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2016 19:51:16 -0500
Message-ID: <9E2486CD-4A05-42A2-AB57-45C309E64DF6@nostrum.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABkgnnWvCSnB=vQK5e+Bu8mBg0=DftfoqJoE065vh7y==x5e1w@mail.gmail.com>
References: <147630754676.6419.3793529940535426058.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CABkgnnW9yP8NHC7xJwN-qt_0Oc=WrxRhWcMO3=YY_8qFvAyzhA@mail.gmail.com> <CAKKJt-fKL-p_Jh-wE8LdYM3RyxBFH1fXtdN8sKoMsuK8XLNnNw@mail.gmail.com> <ADBF3344-5318-4E8D-8A17-1A6941AA86AC@nostrum.com> <CABkgnnWvCSnB=vQK5e+Bu8mBg0=DftfoqJoE065vh7y==x5e1w@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format="flowed"; markup="markdown"
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.9.5r5263)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/webpush/GmehJVc6KtMY9jkuOFMrW-QYE5M>
Cc: Brian Raymor <Brian.Raymor@microsoft.com>, Shida Schubert <shida@ntt-at.com>, Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>, draft-ietf-webpush-protocol@ietf.org, webpush-chairs@ietf.org, "webpush@ietf.org" <webpush@ietf.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Webpush] Ben Campbell's Yes on draft-ietf-webpush-protocol-11: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: webpush@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of potential IETF work on a web push protocol <webpush.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/webpush>, <mailto:webpush-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/webpush/>
List-Post: <mailto:webpush@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:webpush-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/webpush>, <mailto:webpush-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2016 00:51:24 -0000

On 12 Oct 2016, at 19:33, Martin Thomson wrote:

> On 13 October 2016 at 11:21, Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com> wrote:
>> But I think I now understand this to mean e2e protection, at least 
>> with
>> respect to the push service. Some clarification would help. Also, 
>> that seems
>> conceptually bound more to section 8.1 than 8. (Or was 8.1 intended 
>> to
>> expand on the mention in 8?)
>
> Yes, we should be clearer.  And yes, 8.1 was intended to expand on the
> intro to Section 8.  Now that I look at this again, it's probably
> better to move that statement to 8.1.
> I hope this helps: 
> https://github.com/webpush-wg/webpush-protocol/pull/138

That works for me.

Thanks!

Ben.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email