IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Webpush] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on draft-ietf-webpush-protocol-11: (with COMMENT)

Brian Raymor <Brian.Raymor@microsoft.com> Thu, 13 October 2016 01:09 UTC

Return-Path: <Brian.Raymor@microsoft.com>
X-Original-To: webpush@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: webpush@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6346D1295C8; Wed, 12 Oct 2016 18:09:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.022
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.022 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=microsoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QNuzwZ_uff5f; Wed, 12 Oct 2016 18:09:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from NAM02-BL2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bl2nam02on0119.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.38.119]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 221F5129566; Wed, 12 Oct 2016 18:09:05 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=9jibV+4hIipS7uBda16ivdzXt/In5QM55gC59Jw6O88=; b=ZgxTcObUgpMkWNN6iCb7oez64cKRvrhccgorBx5EzXpj+5tgw6Z51kgDzp3z46/BNtMDQM1hr5dnmavzhIxmyRnG2rbeU/h7HeqbWye3KQ3Fv1wjB3d6x2cdQtU0ksyOImFe/aAdtIDwaoEFeipNAMZlELxmSfFB4UUIF/KK+nM=
Received: from CY1PR03MB2380.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.167.8.6) by CY1PR03MB2378.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.166.207.153) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P384) id 15.1.669.12; Thu, 13 Oct 2016 01:09:03 +0000
Received: from CY1PR03MB2380.namprd03.prod.outlook.com ([10.167.8.6]) by CY1PR03MB2380.namprd03.prod.outlook.com ([10.167.8.6]) with mapi id 15.01.0659.020; Thu, 13 Oct 2016 01:09:03 +0000
From: Brian Raymor <Brian.Raymor@microsoft.com>
To: Kathleen Moriarty <Kathleen.Moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on draft-ietf-webpush-protocol-11: (with COMMENT)
Thread-Index: AQHSJLYoZNpGErSVEEe1X/Yl9wYANaClkmGw
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2016 01:09:02 +0000
Message-ID: <CY1PR03MB23809509AFCB9DBB5B66900083DC0@CY1PR03MB2380.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
References: <147629678445.6285.5038003546245862234.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <147629678445.6285.5038003546245862234.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=Brian.Raymor@microsoft.com;
x-originating-ip: [174.61.159.182]
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: a8bc5df3-0f27-44ca-d730-08d3f3058595
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; CY1PR03MB2378; 7:skuFv6llY0bPMW0xIKCN/7VqIh5gBPAED+8bmLwi/KnBz8Y0tvFkiRXE4hq2aWDdvhC9VLwMMCm4K/PUd+01ILVo/j1AzHKo8HkVJuz2T877qe1UNmRICJLuw/jbNnUTtvkETp3jIkyuzyKCb6detpIKLWIr7krcqBa2ai8mB6KQCVdM8eh7uIjD4jqQLji92Nmvv2xQtHCMxFRTkL6qFONIy6Wte+dalKvTciJ8eIzfeR9pQc4QQ44dZwm/kd4W1nAdVHFmj7+CzgflbIDyJjD+lheThPYdCIWtzK2hxUh+BBCiZWU17TpY3Of2eNaKXGNEX3t0499lJAIChTnQbcCoFpLCaiiGVfZ2/76mRLpWFAKJgFEvHV5Es2Gv6pHx
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:CY1PR03MB2378;
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <CY1PR03MB23783E177EF18D22F6892D3F83DC0@CY1PR03MB2378.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(166708455590820)(192374486261705);
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(61425038)(6040176)(601004)(2401047)(8121501046)(5005006)(3002001)(10201501046)(6055026)(61426038)(61427038); SRVR:CY1PR03MB2378; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:CY1PR03MB2378;
x-forefront-prvs: 0094E3478A
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(7916002)(189002)(199003)(33656002)(19580395003)(11100500001)(92566002)(66066001)(7696004)(50986999)(54356999)(97736004)(2950100002)(76176999)(5001770100001)(101416001)(87936001)(106356001)(99286002)(105586002)(106116001)(74316002)(68736007)(305945005)(3660700001)(86612001)(10090500001)(3280700002)(86362001)(8990500004)(102836003)(10400500002)(5005710100001)(9686002)(8676002)(3846002)(7846002)(230783001)(189998001)(6116002)(10290500002)(4326007)(122556002)(5660300001)(5002640100001)(8936002)(2906002)(76576001)(2900100001)(15975445007)(586003)(81166006)(81156014)(77096005)(7736002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:CY1PR03MB2378; H:CY1PR03MB2380.namprd03.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1; LANG:en;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: microsoft.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: microsoft.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 13 Oct 2016 01:09:02.8455 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 72f988bf-86f1-41af-91ab-2d7cd011db47
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: CY1PR03MB2378
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/webpush/J9zg4ErxM6CF5CuIqlF4smaOtfQ>
Cc: "draft-ietf-webpush-protocol@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-webpush-protocol@ietf.org>, "shida@ntt-at.com" <shida@ntt-at.com>, "webpush-chairs@ietf.org" <webpush-chairs@ietf.org>, "webpush@ietf.org" <webpush@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Webpush] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on draft-ietf-webpush-protocol-11: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: webpush@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of potential IETF work on a web push protocol <webpush.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/webpush>, <mailto:webpush-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/webpush/>
List-Post: <mailto:webpush@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:webpush-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/webpush>, <mailto:webpush-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2016 01:09:07 -0000

> The only thing I might add is a note on the varying levels of security
> offered by the HTTP authentication methods, which are documented in their
> RFCs.  Adding just that point to the following (phrased however you'd
> like) would be helpful:
>     A push service MAY
>    choose to authorize requests based on any HTTP-compatible
>    authorization method available, of which there are numerous options.

> The somewhat recent updates to Basic & Digest do a really great job at
> saying how awful they are and there are some experimental options that
> offer some promise now.

Proposed text - https://github.com/webpush-wg/webpush-protocol/pull/139/files

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email