[Webpush] Editorial changes to encryption doc
Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Tue, 25 July 2017 05:02 UTC
Return-Path: <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: webpush@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: webpush@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FDFC127241 for <webpush@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Jul 2017 22:02:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KyIcNm7AAnxk for <webpush@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Jul 2017 22:02:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-it0-x22a.google.com (mail-it0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 91595126BF3 for <webpush@ietf.org>; Mon, 24 Jul 2017 22:02:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-it0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id v127so45661144itd.0 for <webpush@ietf.org>; Mon, 24 Jul 2017 22:02:10 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=OGasVEzYl0vkzBlzCLvXrTKkcSdi8HqRqN/4ra0d6SA=; b=Cl7yAGEbJBkkV8EXx3Raa4nyZOM0/D38jBlNdXKP8YpQhgbQvHQX7M7Vl7b198q8n3 F1ZcPU3a+3CXwVba2tKnV2csGE/BrSzqn86/6eGw4R6QZiBQgvVQ822gTTSvrb7qwc22 Ni8koa2ITFBrBreC3EVqJ/wfAKUoe9KvIg2ULeH7QzSdERO8SpScjSRBpkfnR4I52lrQ +m5fc3w/t6+85FnfpmT8CFmndBZA52/+0G2Py97+hKyfDAZFt6I5ng4SoohZAusre1lZ AXWkrcMnS3y+AbQlhNUfVYxs3ZTVP9vUQhorGEZpmnKimIJnNiyxXO/wc2q3ZFDeGRRP nwFw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=OGasVEzYl0vkzBlzCLvXrTKkcSdi8HqRqN/4ra0d6SA=; b=LGz+CDoT2RNjBfxld2w/uWPEH2vKKP4ZSn5Uy/18RGcruY5iw2VQIm3JwHJlGhu75I SUxF4jtMvbu3UfccIZ50E4kBd2it1UPeGhTWMm4jdr8m4c9dssOzlNgc9ixgC36fqh2o 5Q127OyQXok/BGo+8dScfqnHXGDd8D7WxhiXUUwElwT4dJej1gY5rsO+WAQBKxjAknCD nmXntowrkQyE0tSzpQI7y+yhPY8bfV3QNCNh4hHN5vI549Ri8ZxjKCqnjz4bJOcztHc+ hpI0elEw6XTRztZeC2nZbKONBNzryCqYvXDbIMLVrD+FHliWB8j+5jyTdDrYy0UQ+Rd3 W5ew==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIVw113hTysw1yuzCMl8Waji+gJlN2Ux00bCSQwEQj6ZedfAu5mnSQQ9 zI+ykDRbiZ9BEvKaKXgacBPA4R8N5YPqXh0=
X-Received: by 10.36.53.70 with SMTP id k67mr9735523ita.79.1500958929766; Mon, 24 Jul 2017 22:02:09 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.107.164.42 with HTTP; Mon, 24 Jul 2017 22:02:09 -0700 (PDT)
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2017 15:02:09 +1000
Message-ID: <CABkgnnULKNHS3-VpJ7vf+W5y2-+GiSmqds0_E2OpG-WqEn2_Zw@mail.gmail.com>
To: "webpush@ietf.org" <webpush@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/webpush/Kkva7KLb7KwwB3aJWEhXkUA8Uec>
Subject: [Webpush] Editorial changes to encryption doc
X-BeenThere: webpush@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of potential IETF work on a web push protocol <webpush.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/webpush>, <mailto:webpush-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/webpush/>
List-Post: <mailto:webpush@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:webpush-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/webpush>, <mailto:webpush-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2017 05:02:12 -0000
Just to keep everyone here up to date on what is going on, here are the current outstanding changes to the -encryption doc. I believe that all of these are minor and editorial, but I thought that I'd point them out. Adam Roach did a review: https://github.com/webpush-wg/webpush-encryption/pull/15 Frank did a secdir review and found some other errors: https://github.com/webpush-wg/webpush-encryption/pull/16 Finally, I noticed an error when I rebased to RFC 8188: https://github.com/webpush-wg/webpush-encryption/pull/17
- [Webpush] Editorial changes to encryption doc Martin Thomson