IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Webpush] WGLC for draft-ietf-webpush-protocol (again)

Kit Cambridge <kcambridge@mozilla.com> Mon, 27 June 2016 10:04 UTC

Return-Path: <kcambridge@mozilla.com>
X-Original-To: webpush@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: webpush@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DD5312D0BC for <webpush@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Jun 2016 03:04:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.551
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.551 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DATE_IN_PAST_12_24=1.049, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mozilla-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id popfqeLs7INt for <webpush@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Jun 2016 03:04:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pf0-x22e.google.com (mail-pf0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c00::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2B98512D0B5 for <webpush@ietf.org>; Mon, 27 Jun 2016 03:04:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pf0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id h14so60644381pfe.1 for <webpush@ietf.org>; Mon, 27 Jun 2016 03:04:27 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mozilla-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc:message-id:references :to; bh=NprwGcQXLLkvjklJS/2cQYbM5QJMzNM8Q4aKliElSH4=; b=xPeCD0ElGDMTJYff/ZG0qX+Zjha9qqF6bx6tJBxbzo+uw6Z9sHczaQgsnqolpYXcuf KsYvSy6WvjJVjNEeiJDAxSwtLQPvXC/J5OjFFLH29U/iiiy7AGI51n4IdCOL7lp58wRy DYDC3QydJCk/qiSs9je9/eQpneN++QHGw8yq8OgOs17bX2PeGszpkgcWgrHOIRKEvrL3 DcixFKzb9d+JIVatlIFtTnVgDC+rfuRm+9dQK4+xtRjyJvl5kivnHunXp7ZrnjkArJDm WuSaOefW0kRSAq2CvvfTb93hXNeDFb5QHW7KOAkkTzzw1CcIJuyIdcFOySbDtAwEQcRZ yPuA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :message-id:references:to; bh=NprwGcQXLLkvjklJS/2cQYbM5QJMzNM8Q4aKliElSH4=; b=A2m+RNl+lWSwfTY86G92+r+MevblicrerNBlH1ObONakhmxTQYqy+xCB53ar5jNhHj IlZqQ8usyyNeqSsR8w4BKeAHn06olhWAKjHXwtNyZf9wWl7vNdyYTN3HmBDpgYKgROuP eWSD7nmmRoPevSS1sHm8M1iuCYyjsQJ2WmircRRvlPt9njUgFSdYFA/wcxzSb2Q3KFY5 UQtuQXaIxe7SsKwyPwT7lo5sD1JcYQNbkKPg8+Ro6vXgJrdaMoYKQV/6+ZJhD56RyTFU YEAA/lx/9YoCd/D+7Ev99DHInX2+fiVcOnbXNe60/vJHc7hzoo2Qrfxkj78GkmDJibwN ftdw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tLR6XiNk0+Rvt593DTBcjkHmbO7i1XFfVG0AYHIWwX9x4/9lpnSRShU+5wQ2n6+dDZ9
X-Received: by 10.98.208.197 with SMTP id p188mr31944534pfg.152.1467021866730; Mon, 27 Jun 2016 03:04:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.1.5] (c-69-181-119-84.hsd1.ca.comcast.net. [69.181.119.84]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y70sm5520322pff.25.2016.06.27.03.04.25 (version=TLS1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 27 Jun 2016 03:04:25 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_9233EC4E-D516-4CD4-BC36-8E7166ABB8CE"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
From: Kit Cambridge <kcambridge@mozilla.com>
In-Reply-To: <fee55fa2-fbdf-b63e-7acb-b0b429deb0ff@mozilla.com>
Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2016 16:06:16 +0100
Message-Id: <786718A2-C28D-436C-B91D-B3217F459F2E@mozilla.com>
References: <E7305E31-07A2-4B84-AA90-635AB97E46DF@ntt-at.com> <fee55fa2-fbdf-b63e-7acb-b0b429deb0ff@mozilla.com>
To: jr conlin <jconlin@mozilla.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/webpush/L6_kMYmU9zQbB2qOLb7ZMOlqelw>
Cc: webpush@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Webpush] WGLC for draft-ietf-webpush-protocol (again)
X-BeenThere: webpush@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of potential IETF work on a web push protocol <webpush.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/webpush>, <mailto:webpush-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/webpush/>
List-Post: <mailto:webpush@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:webpush-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/webpush>, <mailto:webpush-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2016 10:04:31 -0000

I support the draft, with gratitude to the editors and chairs for their hard work.

Cheers,
- kit

On Jun 23, 2016, at 5:23 PM, jr conlin <jconlin@mozilla.com> wrote:

> I have no additional concerns or requests for this protocol, and support this draft.
> 
> Huge thanks to the editors and contributors for their patience and understanding.
> 
> On 6/23/2016 12:58 AM, Shida Schubert wrote:
>> All;
>> 
>> As I noted on the e-mail I sent out on June 7th after the initial WGLC for webpush protocol draft, we are commencing another WGLC as there are no remaining issues on github AND the authors have produced the 06 version of the draft reflecting all resolutions.
>> 
>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-webpush-protocol-06
>> 
>> If you have any issues or questions regarding the draft please submit it to the list, when raising issues please provide constructive resolution whenever possible.
>> 
>> PLEASE acknowledge on the list when you are content/happy with the status of the draft and you see no issue passing it forward to IESG for publication. 
>> 
>> The WGLC will conclude at the end of the day on July 8th PST.
>> 
>> Shida
>> As co-chair
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Webpush mailing list
>> Webpush@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/webpush
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Webpush mailing list
> Webpush@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/webpush

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email