Re: [Webpush] I-D Action: draft-ietf-webpush-encryption-06.txt

Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Tue, 01 November 2016 01:08 UTC

Return-Path: <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: webpush@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: webpush@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11BD81293F4 for <webpush@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 31 Oct 2016 18:08:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NSD1YZe7lI_r for <webpush@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 31 Oct 2016 18:08:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk0-x22e.google.com (mail-qk0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 88C501293DA for <webpush@ietf.org>; Mon, 31 Oct 2016 18:08:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id q130so63490457qke.1 for <webpush@ietf.org>; Mon, 31 Oct 2016 18:08:55 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=ID3K0DqMiQF48qOTdJTPc4sl0k8M55tgPAnlpknneas=; b=Rtx/ge7ME5DeGS4QPOHyb30nMHoPx2zWgI2AuxMz6tKM+ON/JhWvaq+L567IQS/fA/ B7dzvDGxvCPitI+iU18oJKABvAJ+BAQnb40C38z1jHRzRpLGNUkMKc1cNQapeiLrDwjQ 3aOrkoLe6X1FkEtnnB0QRH6QOuZs/BqXEiXdWrqpY5chAYslI6YuHKB0HKnBZF6Kzo5T 35MSaQbxrzEj0U1MqSwgEu5G22ovx4UDBG/taBlo79lkQvd/wJWMy8EmScRCF8eU0HZS tlJSmI2nBt3kZSm+Pg7kDFLoUXlSFIgOenYV6Ot09djGO+n11PEkX3ku/1qTt3+yRn3q oqVA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=ID3K0DqMiQF48qOTdJTPc4sl0k8M55tgPAnlpknneas=; b=CsuKLKZN9Ufalw84dbL60zq7m21ZuSqNAUlohSBoDFsR3bqQVVBuLDIcARDulaOz7M g/mFsGKMsY1B2nuPLZ8G0fU8kmko9mXAkrHYezNHSKYjfg4rp7VKfdxVqVROv9D0RBmP OG0Bwug6U5qBhLa+QHl568tSsrdTMstQ2eQ9U6saDZd003AQsyw71OInRp1dFHphwn3Y RdSGWwIhXoXEGS0i6fnfbqp+9GcR08BLooUNlnlKNFDoTkhsx88LaDiWSY6/xDYQwobS KfpTMA0P/6qAQer7i2Hv+nclYmEXKSy9Z9mxbUCIG0IijVqSv1mugh2z+Diqs0Nq94YS s4Eg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngvesozvSKhrQpCG/E3KyTFWDpGNVsJ77IcNlEsDfWJ6odBzMehupjjTJeNoJefuRNAY269XTF36EWWWk8w==
X-Received: by 10.233.235.72 with SMTP id b69mr1212235qkg.144.1477962534547; Mon, 31 Oct 2016 18:08:54 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.140.85.7 with HTTP; Mon, 31 Oct 2016 18:08:54 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <147796137813.23209.8561679192884629222.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
References: <147796137813.23209.8561679192884629222.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2016 12:08:54 +1100
Message-ID: <CABkgnnVQeYgRqcTT0Dkd_uAyY3yoMAOo3Su422wHBOGh-NJ3fg@mail.gmail.com>
To: "webpush@ietf.org" <webpush@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/webpush/LCxbpMuRVP5zQBNBJJN4JUk_E3s>
Subject: Re: [Webpush] I-D Action: draft-ietf-webpush-encryption-06.txt
X-BeenThere: webpush@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of potential IETF work on a web push protocol <webpush.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/webpush>, <mailto:webpush-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/webpush/>
List-Post: <mailto:webpush@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:webpush-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/webpush>, <mailto:webpush-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2016 01:08:58 -0000

I decided to address Peter's comments and get them on the record.

On 1 November 2016 at 11:49,  <internet-drafts@ietf.org> wrote:
>
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
> This draft is a work item of the Web-Based Push Notifications of the IETF.
>
>         Title           : Message Encryption for Web Push
>         Author          : Martin Thomson
>         Filename        : draft-ietf-webpush-encryption-06.txt
>         Pages           : 11
>         Date            : 2016-10-31
>
> Abstract:
>    A message encryption scheme is described for the Web Push protocol.
>    This scheme provides confidentiality and integrity for messages sent
>    from an Application Server to a User Agent.
>
>
> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-webpush-encryption/
>
> There's also a htmlized version available at:
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-webpush-encryption-06
>
> A diff from the previous version is available at:
> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-webpush-encryption-06
>
>
> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
>
> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
>
> _______________________________________________
> Webpush mailing list
> Webpush@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/webpush