Re: [Webpush] Require the TTL header
Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Fri, 05 February 2016 11:26 UTC
Return-Path: <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: webpush@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: webpush@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB49F1A21C1
for <webpush@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Feb 2016 03:26:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9,
DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1,
FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id M2BleDXHnkOH for <webpush@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Fri, 5 Feb 2016 03:26:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ig0-x22e.google.com (mail-ig0-x22e.google.com
[IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::22e])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A9DD31A21C0
for <webpush@ietf.org>; Fri, 5 Feb 2016 03:26:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ig0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id hb3so11592959igb.0
for <webpush@ietf.org>; Fri, 05 Feb 2016 03:26:13 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
:cc:content-type;
bh=OZP9f1H2pQ/70tHe22ok/0Aj1pRor4BeFIwSe1jOMlg=;
b=p6s1yBR1yeo96hbvJ5800hb3AsyDq6Fp1MOl6B8bbJAPplxGYVRY5K1TtCamtFE/Nw
5mskc8a46wsSRK/ylWaYa+JUYkybh+aG5ZkIYffqDCCMIUPZUYng/GBqRI72JLUe/UNU
SeAcLF7kCf4in7+ST+GQsIHTqfMhXgzxAnwgP4CtPPEmJpVjJdPSCfO2UCrOb/yxO3Bv
SCEHuInEPk2OgNf+x985QPlRB2f+KdryKJWhMBjQmU2Tl3A0VGjqRA45lb+uYQl9vH5V
kWxaJkg11NEHwVPPB9iFAwDWjgxRtqR4BhxuY+nX7knUxr/IWxRDPD6xRtOZamTz9wsw
gLOQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type;
bh=OZP9f1H2pQ/70tHe22ok/0Aj1pRor4BeFIwSe1jOMlg=;
b=fttUa/KAOdDRBq3c+BNljZ0BMEqW2zamA9RdIggSbUI+V6PDjjhnAx7Pv6phB5UhwS
sdRNmCEAqLpouVcTlTp8IZ+edzxxW1ybNaRzdLbxF5f0OhbNL7iybmB+eGusUgP0dNfK
MJPCInKYa08qoA4c+Oy7HVWgRQxkQtIYNFWVri6vHsmas/HfGA+Q1608ZXu+gAN8/3MM
tMV9EbqDh7YJ5pO7+XAhpZWmIHZD5egY26qD8OOGLMESgHl+zQ48j1ymaRWO1t9aKIgG
PiWA892egxltwGyFurVhQbMuHJfOJ+rtZkPeOacyLQrGtk3LnwwvFIugvNZl5RHpqnXE
1cPw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOTmOXGu+eeDi3zqHm7CS/CFIutYvEhgqVdKMlbmaXfagNVudhY4dKp8+trfU328FHC4kT7At4qQbOKDsw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.50.12.3 with SMTP id u3mr6483336igb.77.1454671573117; Fri,
05 Feb 2016 03:26:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.36.53.79 with HTTP; Fri, 5 Feb 2016 03:26:13 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <BY2PR0301MB06477C93FA8937F0ABD4393383D20@BY2PR0301MB0647.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
References: <CABp8Eu+oBj8XKWbqd9ypT_mQWzMxXDe+cBR_vqk=rJ=6tM3tFA@mail.gmail.com>
<BY2PR0301MB06477C93FA8937F0ABD4393383D20@BY2PR0301MB0647.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2016 22:26:13 +1100
Message-ID: <CABkgnnWmfBVPMhCoSJ14B2yrGh7ieNH04_oR6XgpEkFv0RuVvA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
To: Brian Raymor <Brian.Raymor@microsoft.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/webpush/LlWvrgsntBDJ3G51lSfcEkK_vBk>
Cc: Benjamin Bangert <bbangert@mozilla.com>,
"webpush@ietf.org" <webpush@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Webpush] Require the TTL header
X-BeenThere: webpush@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of potential IETF work on a web push protocol
<webpush.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/webpush>,
<mailto:webpush-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/webpush/>
List-Post: <mailto:webpush@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:webpush-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/webpush>,
<mailto:webpush-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2016 11:26:15 -0000
On 5 February 2016 at 16:42, Brian Raymor <Brian.Raymor@microsoft.com> wrote: >> Can we require a TTL value for web-push notifications? > > I'd support this requirement if it helps to enforce correct behavior in implementations. I'm also in support of this. Ben makes a good argument. Removing defaults and being up-front about potential mistakes was a pretty good way to ensure solid interoperability for h2.
- Re: [Webpush] Require the TTL header Costin Manolache
- Re: [Webpush] Require the TTL header Benjamin Bangert
- Re: [Webpush] Require the TTL header Costin Manolache
- [Webpush] Require the TTL header Benjamin Bangert
- Re: [Webpush] Require the TTL header Brian Raymor
- Re: [Webpush] Require the TTL header Martin Thomson
- Re: [Webpush] Require the TTL header Miguel Garcia
- Re: [Webpush] Require the TTL header Brian Raymor
- Re: [Webpush] Require the TTL header Benjamin Bangert
- Re: [Webpush] Require the TTL header Benjamin Bangert
- Re: [Webpush] Require the TTL header Brian Raymor
- Re: [Webpush] Require the TTL header Martin Thomson
- Re: [Webpush] Require the TTL header Costin Manolache
- Re: [Webpush] Require the TTL header Brian Raymor