Re: [Webpush] Make it a bit more obvious which is the send resource
Brian Raymor <Brian.Raymor@microsoft.com> Mon, 13 June 2016 17:04 UTC
Return-Path: <Brian.Raymor@microsoft.com>
X-Original-To: webpush@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: webpush@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3A0D12D89C
for <webpush@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Jun 2016 10:04:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.003
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.003 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001,
RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001]
autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
header.d=microsoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id Ufvp25q7OJju for <webpush@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Mon, 13 Jun 2016 10:04:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from na01-by2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com
(mail-by2on0141.outbound.protection.outlook.com [207.46.100.141])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3B06E12D8A1
for <webpush@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 Jun 2016 10:04:54 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com;
s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version;
bh=lj++WSCu3IpV/ek3lOnLupcndr+mr5UEO3QcTFew/Zk=;
b=Mt++jBfTPBGWmnpZkb/seg8/XYwvkRNVIu7HLSyK3ZGkQD3Q/EOChQWw4vjIfzhBFj9ti2wANZUIDhgyPb9J73op54ohkAmY1X2I5sa5couB5CAtw8BXo/oGRhu3D2pR47b/aOiEYPp+3jCm9M+1zut/CL720LGiR55yiw1y7cY=
Received: from CO2PR03MB2407.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.166.93.137) by
CO2PR03MB2408.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.166.93.138) with Microsoft SMTP
Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P384) id
15.1.517.8; Mon, 13 Jun 2016 17:04:53 +0000
Received: from CO2PR03MB2407.namprd03.prod.outlook.com ([10.166.93.137]) by
CO2PR03MB2407.namprd03.prod.outlook.com ([10.166.93.137]) with mapi id
15.01.0517.009; Mon, 13 Jun 2016 17:04:53 +0000
From: Brian Raymor <Brian.Raymor@microsoft.com>
To: Brian Raymor <Brian.Raymor@microsoft.com>, "webpush@ietf.org"
<webpush@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Make it a bit more obvious which is the send resource
Thread-Index: AdHDXNhAonl6T8X8QNqz9D+vlR3iegCN/N2A
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2016 17:04:52 +0000
Message-ID: <CO2PR03MB2407DAB07C9B533244C042CE83530@CO2PR03MB2407.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
References: <CO2PR03MB240709765D6BB0CFF75CFE1483500@CO2PR03MB2407.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <CO2PR03MB240709765D6BB0CFF75CFE1483500@CO2PR03MB2407.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is )
smtp.mailfrom=Brian.Raymor@microsoft.com;
x-originating-ip: [2001:4898:80e8:b::177]
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 8d821883-1699-4071-f247-08d393acd686
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; CO2PR03MB2408;
6:gJHM4Rvhtp5yc9DJKEIyPfCXM8DZvqMUJgfuCOBMmH2wDxWwBY5B8h5CR00WRhaqsiu7uy4B4B3AZAZnHv6p2EFiz4msgHFy3MX6Vf0OYy0Af+xvP7asf2xXWzwBbXP/fLDFuhIP0Puc+Sj7e3mntYmVdQ3cnOqsfN3M0vhjPCf6q41d//IaTo8/ceCpiEC7927ZsbdQIemhV9dkz1+AWhflwfCxgLgNSCBPQzTo32PjRni2+Pi0uxFcu6B5AxsWB33k6Osp3zJv4Z1rs3zCNekimGNlTC6DUlB6HZXFpV+K+S4uCTJqiKxhnenZOkatmkFULAF7P9vpJtaWM4Ne5g==;
5:8U8Av3KIjK96dt0bNANF4FV2YkPMsAW/D2a5BIPdPpxbv5Neig+W82F+7Zl0ePp9AG0ND1c5SwVvL5DQS5GEhev9eXCK/Y6qc8vCBtpPbXzBYN1wzMC5yb+n0y/ODpYv+NSq9G/X9ficXbA0Orb3EQ==;
24:ZQr+rjbqt4twaWHtHkGC8so1SsK1v3Vmn0KOb/1IvISEiApySV7QVAd/Kb0VOUjeh3k1qZfPqgkkHfIM9TkvjVD05EKlW/5672MHhpe1HIM=;
7:RehTf9fjP1YhvvQXm0mUwlfZd0mOHYVaplBJTeaTHUnIMZcMW62ndIkZ0ThjWcTYjGqeJJEZaj7QN3CM3rwGFqVsZf2RfgzGyWuTq2/VCH1p0W4KKpJTHuOAvl8gGyY6iiivcsP31n4ugvr3DJyNZizP47r6Z4NG9Yu7UWjgVW2ANVrhDYtRA/n9q5Vid4AU/PNf24waAXRo00OEu7Q9N1TorT+fw7juygkiZYa6ahrEJKWNhsSBv9BaHzEY7fpE
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:CO2PR03MB2408;
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <CO2PR03MB240866467921BF299A3EC4E283530@CO2PR03MB2408.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(158342451672863)(166708455590820);
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0;
RULEID:(61425038)(601004)(2401047)(8121501046)(5005006)(3002001)(10201501046)(6055026)(61426038)(61427038);
SRVR:CO2PR03MB2408; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:CO2PR03MB2408;
x-forefront-prvs: 0972DEC1D9
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM;
SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(7916002)(377454003)(199003)(189002)(13464003)(189998001)(86612001)(5008740100001)(86362001)(50986999)(450100001)(76576001)(2906002)(92566002)(99286002)(68736007)(74316001)(8990500004)(33656002)(5003600100002)(102836003)(54356999)(6116002)(97736004)(5001770100001)(107886002)(87936001)(2561002)(2421001)(101416001)(1511001)(11100500001)(2501003)(122556002)(586003)(81166006)(81156014)(5004730100002)(15975445007)(9686002)(8676002)(5002640100001)(8936002)(10290500002)(2900100001)(106356001)(5005710100001)(10400500002)(10090500001)(77096005)(76176999)(105586002)(3660700001)(3280700002)(2950100001)(19580405001)(19580395003)(3826002);
DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:CO2PR03MB2408;
H:CO2PR03MB2407.namprd03.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; PTR:InfoNoRecords;
A:1; MX:1; CAT:NONE; LANG:en; CAT:NONE;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: microsoft.com does not designate
permitted sender hosts)
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: microsoft.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 13 Jun 2016 17:04:53.0791 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 72f988bf-86f1-41af-91ab-2d7cd011db47
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: CO2PR03MB2408
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/webpush/MJEzCR-mUD9SR9anUUXNgLkK2aU>
Subject: Re: [Webpush] Make it a bit more obvious which is the send resource
X-BeenThere: webpush@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of potential IETF work on a web push protocol
<webpush.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/webpush>,
<mailto:webpush-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/webpush/>
List-Post: <mailto:webpush@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:webpush-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/webpush>,
<mailto:webpush-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2016 17:04:56 -0000
I'm not hearing a strong desire to rename "push resource" to "push delivery resource" as a clarification during WGLC. Closed https://github.com/webpush-wg/webpush-protocol/pull/105. -----Original Message----- From: Webpush [mailto:webpush-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Brian Raymor Sent: Friday, June 10, 2016 2:28 PM To: webpush@ietf.org Subject: [Webpush] Make it a bit more obvious which is the send resource https://github.com/webpush-wg/webpush-protocol/pull/105 Costin noted - "push resource" is confusing me every time - "push" is used in all other resources. The original text: The push service MUST provide a URI for the push resource corresponding to the push message subscription in a link relation of type "urn:ietf:params:push". Bikeshed follows. Would adding "delivery" clarify the use? This would match how we currently describe the process when the application server sends a message. It requests "delivery": The push service MUST provide a URI for the push *delivery* resource corresponding to the push message subscription in a link relation of type "urn:ietf:params:push:delivery". 5. Requesting Push Message Delivery An application server requests the delivery of a push message by sending a HTTP POST request to a push *delivery* resource _______________________________________________ Webpush mailing list Webpush@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/webpush
- [Webpush] Make it a bit more obvious which is the… Brian Raymor
- Re: [Webpush] Make it a bit more obvious which is… Brian Raymor