Re: [Webpush] Ben Campbell's Yes on draft-ietf-webpush-encryption-08: (with COMMENT)

Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Wed, 16 August 2017 05:19 UTC

Return-Path: <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: webpush@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: webpush@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7362E132494; Tue, 15 Aug 2017 22:19:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Sdy6_HbE5HAz; Tue, 15 Aug 2017 22:19:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io0-x22a.google.com (mail-io0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7A6691200C5; Tue, 15 Aug 2017 22:19:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id j32so9848379iod.0; Tue, 15 Aug 2017 22:19:47 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=GrvLCXNOLmFt8aAP4xutJcO8he5hgkT+qikGKaLdmwc=; b=PNLwy9o5Yp8uIVGiX3+dNrRu/0TVGNvPcr+7cIpcsRYli6BHrd1Rrx76GB0Xzw+3D+ CdkFz0wF//mTsIOFvkqo910hxx9U61hHMo+96ko2j4LeJ6bT9bMsuBH4AShEkn9wXEL5 qnhplpVPF4eSsxY62lUI6SGG4aS4qqfRnpkiWJVRrcMgf/CWh+XbOtFW8+CwmfJkxB3n OJeroHdHnlqpgywKIqRY5ShnLFBtGvGA8Ktw/dQu9oE3nssHs9EGOfz0bkE7RiRnUXZ8 WHY+JSqZmmQi7cflKof4QrR/DdDfSaPuysE4pplGSJWyGdc91pKeeu6B6Px3tREySKMo pMdA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=GrvLCXNOLmFt8aAP4xutJcO8he5hgkT+qikGKaLdmwc=; b=bmcxYIQn3o4YE4NoRczDXu7sGYuBJRbWxiTJW/DYIXS0vn3nFct9tuHe75Ws/AKNki khFmIAI+RM9GI00wth+SJ8GU+W7wP/t1yjeEcMoWIF71CWWXmGSJ87Ygx4Kr94lyVB6z oIuGswUseLY479NyvRDCTiuQYjdlkn4URv3FWYhmiohcQMqkooyxq2QO/Z6X096qhnJ7 tVq8OO2cjZGf+Pu+Kl0Ye+mFIeMxtx006Mz3cf/fPke3f6EmEl5F7wFy/a5625WBIZr3 QBSRNwMOzufTwsLppvClrz5mf8SYgq6L16o/IPa7ys4lO1DnX2JOV+VVd80ZFNnKVhbF tm8Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: AHYfb5jOSphqsAtTjWjiwc/AViQD3Gkqqxzmhk1mfciW48NmxJt6Nr9t iCETlQpEVH5kIS5xDU38Z+SlXEMxlQ==
X-Received: by 10.107.16.196 with SMTP id 65mr467008ioq.297.1502860786871; Tue, 15 Aug 2017 22:19:46 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.107.164.42 with HTTP; Tue, 15 Aug 2017 22:19:46 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <150285392127.12601.16486468628540142046.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
References: <150285392127.12601.16486468628540142046.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2017 15:19:46 +1000
Message-ID: <CABkgnnV1MokRJZw=ks5s7iwumDj0AnUy0CVbHCUm_rOifTcJ9g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-webpush-encryption@ietf.org, Phil Sorber <sorber@apache.org>, webpush-chairs@ietf.org, "webpush@ietf.org" <webpush@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/webpush/NBhPJj9vGFLl1dvun2tFOp7U5zM>
Subject: Re: [Webpush] Ben Campbell's Yes on draft-ietf-webpush-encryption-08: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: webpush@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of potential IETF work on a web push protocol <webpush.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/webpush>, <mailto:webpush-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/webpush/>
List-Post: <mailto:webpush@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:webpush-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/webpush>, <mailto:webpush-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2017 05:19:50 -0000

On 16 August 2017 at 13:25, Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>; wrote:
> - 1: "For efficiency reasons, multiple users of Web Push often share a
>    central agent that aggregates push functionality."
>
> Is the "central agent" a push server, application server, or something else?

With Spencer's comment addressed, this is now:

  Multiple users of Web Push at the same user agent often share a
central agent that aggregates push functionality.

Does that make sense now?  PR here:
https://github.com/webpush-wg/webpush-encryption/pull/21

> -1: "Web Push messages are the payload of an HTTP message " - Plural disagreement.

Fixed previously in response to directorate review or by a PR.

> -4, first paragraph: s/ "... some of the length..." / "... sum of the length ..."

As above.