IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Webpush] Polling to adopt VAPID draft

jr conlin <jconlin@mozilla.com> Tue, 05 April 2016 02:14 UTC

Return-Path: <jconlin@mozilla.com>
X-Original-To: webpush@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: webpush@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 888E412D5B0 for <webpush@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Apr 2016 19:14:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mozilla-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0nXIysPwTIut for <webpush@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Apr 2016 19:14:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pf0-x22a.google.com (mail-pf0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c00::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1295D12D5A9 for <webpush@ietf.org>; Mon, 4 Apr 2016 19:14:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pf0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id e128so24666pfe.3 for <webpush@ietf.org>; Mon, 04 Apr 2016 19:14:40 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mozilla-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to; bh=kwzVYT2fHOUfuCMV0KAjK6HKkJlVbZe5GIeqAuhbxlQ=; b=dmlNdACselSO8HgodHNT6/xxw0/+ugTUQf11uhxcq2wuW8QAWlCvLVRrw43vaigAOz qOY4bFIe/unzByYXSZQfaY5gsEu37H5fPZPISN2Fsqo7mmcWNRig5bzfYWWx+a4JGvP4 hrl9n++2cy3574PIUvivLZ0hPC1ikdXdeXc5KCNPAdFAuvYILEdqVLqVF8ZbtAXtbZqE ld1cgaZs/emb5d+dV3k5Otv9R0nsZeD7IRrpgLYV1TUB4mUThjg3FTSum/rgQJ5Qszdj o+FISDGqweZGSKkLl6eo4ZDx5AByV3c/8CEVBs4qQsHqL28B/k67pCISiWaVB4CHQmc5 Qs9w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=kwzVYT2fHOUfuCMV0KAjK6HKkJlVbZe5GIeqAuhbxlQ=; b=FhIZ2HkPefvNVor5k3H687BMrmh5IgCdl8wHL3wNgPbTUBGZxGndxTr8fV7DiWgR6m aMQLo8LO9l1Ax0wzBQ9rh1X4WbIPq4zIlTkfpD67r9gh6F2z5rp5fsJu2dcju01by+dZ BYJ/OK/dX2Igg0jFwc21gqHyyV3TrGWXi/QGU6e9Lsr+SC84K6CQzQSLPffPdrsNldDw jcipEIYomOouPvv7njiH2btxJeIr/tQ5xYhY/XJY1jRqoN7oR6qx+aU9KPZsYkKBFz6F /rZazt2smLPeSh9T7zLdGaDxc+EA4VD9RuYga3sj0of3+T+FPOvA0DEUEuoj/o2HW0HW 1v+Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJJGmZ6pnpp6qr3sjmzVewrX4us1wAFsc8krf3r1653afv9qJ/o3TI2ANu4wsau7kBQK
X-Received: by 10.98.10.29 with SMTP id s29mr25925972pfi.166.1459822480407; Mon, 04 Apr 2016 19:14:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.2.102] (107-130-102-77.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net. [107.130.102.77]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id ml5sm3303907pab.2.2016.04.04.19.14.39 for <webpush@ietf.org> (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 04 Apr 2016 19:14:39 -0700 (PDT)
To: webpush@ietf.org
References: <9EDD05BA-A6D3-4F37-8E65-19D573324966@ntt-at.com>
From: jr conlin <jconlin@mozilla.com>
Message-ID: <57031F98.3080300@mozilla.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2016 19:14:48 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <9EDD05BA-A6D3-4F37-8E65-19D573324966@ntt-at.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------050106020001010306030804"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/webpush/QBWmazWTIF3nyleLNXpKX7M1s2I>
Subject: Re: [Webpush] Polling to adopt VAPID draft
X-BeenThere: webpush@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of potential IETF work on a web push protocol <webpush.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/webpush>, <mailto:webpush-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/webpush/>
List-Post: <mailto:webpush@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:webpush-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/webpush>, <mailto:webpush-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2016 02:14:44 -0000

As a service provider, I express my strong support for the VAPID 
specification.

On 04/04/2016 03:18 PM, Shida Schubert wrote:
>
> All;
>
> As I mentioned at the meeting today, I am polling the list for 
> adopting VAPID draft as a WG item for a milestone “voluntary 
> application identification mechanism for web push draft to IESG as 
> Proposed Standard”.
>
> https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-thomson-webpush-vapid-02.txt
>
> If you have concern or objections with this, please express your 
> opinion(s) by responding to this e-mail.
>
> If you like the draft, see value and you like to see it adopted, 
> please express that as well by responding to this e-mail.
> *Even if you have expressed your interest previously in the room or on 
> the list, please express your support again.
>
> If you are confused with this e-mail, please let me know :)
>
> Thanks!
> Shida as co-chair
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Webpush mailing list
> Webpush@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/webpush

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email