IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Webpush] WGLC for draft-ietf-webpush-protocol (again)

Peter Beverloo <beverloo@google.com> Thu, 23 June 2016 15:27 UTC

Return-Path: <beverloo@google.com>
X-Original-To: webpush@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: webpush@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8647B128E18 for <webpush@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Jun 2016 08:27:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.126
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.126 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.426, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aDDo9e8kLrBm for <webpush@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Jun 2016 08:27:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf0-x231.google.com (mail-lf0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6288D12D1AC for <webpush@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Jun 2016 08:27:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf0-x231.google.com with SMTP id q132so98144295lfe.3 for <webpush@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Jun 2016 08:27:28 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=plrPdMVIsD1z8hjU4fk7DJgP/3h1YJYYS/cTLt05Ctc=; b=BpGgKA74EkBgbuvrB61PREG/XWvp1xc7FReo8i+AroBXoiP+bf0AVwGkvGd9FjtsfV ck3pM/6Ywkr0M2+mKJJtPtwtswMH31O/PcqvB53NaReeJW/yxj5jFJtwb/x4hTfBdKuz klvJ6iQPgp6IvBhL9RASlNeto8eeQ4fBLAq9kvQaxFcY8VrqDSygtKcyRAeEYqdox3Ug BrkCelcRZymJcEZt3mFghDytbScWmuNuDv2YHhCZt0m+VisK8EOF+AjdNdkg44r5pA3B l1GoYlcOqxEOD9b0Mp1lgI+epd6JzHmAL0wjObLBOEZurNudrwz3aWJZi1KZ3caSyBq1 6uPQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=plrPdMVIsD1z8hjU4fk7DJgP/3h1YJYYS/cTLt05Ctc=; b=Vfr5lcZ6KRAnzIvrXZekvFvcsHFfSP0WiLkOXTlqmcy+Wc/5EmAT0zg1gAy6gASznL p9nf6l2zO7yppWra4ek8THI+Ca7xNlN984DiU588p+WMSPyurt0cJp69rlS6ANxSovv6 Uy/xsapRiQ4QiCJPYMImO7xnvTdMCTTFJk7KQZfW2oZ4GUsiNePxTx9tUQ3UumjH9jm/ oeTCtTJESuhrj1qtlZRaegXVa/kd21pja34oPmBy4TIWPbFIzlyIF7SAwCgJbET+4VSb aNQq30ghYDcErXTJYNUFf2PVbT8SfujEcy5nMjvxRa86GPEXmeFwaKfT05UsoDg7IzSB xFBQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tLcXvruhjUL/k8Rz36vndrpfgSHRjOL3xHguQvfJ/vBRwB3kLcwXb4mt2WCcKMoX8YudE4rAEL2FS9hOUGV
X-Received: by 10.25.166.2 with SMTP id p2mr12476356lfe.48.1466695646117; Thu, 23 Jun 2016 08:27:26 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.25.147.199 with HTTP; Thu, 23 Jun 2016 08:27:25 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <E7305E31-07A2-4B84-AA90-635AB97E46DF@ntt-at.com>
References: <E7305E31-07A2-4B84-AA90-635AB97E46DF@ntt-at.com>
From: Peter Beverloo <beverloo@google.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2016 16:27:25 +0100
Message-ID: <CALt3x6nohOPmq+wap_6VOVBXaSFnO8LyrCFshmA=TR57MFZ67g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Shida Schubert <shida@ntt-at.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11411d66fb55860535f3b079
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/webpush/SIB8RDgpeRCUKYcs_dRn02Nunks>
Cc: "webpush@ietf.org" <webpush@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Webpush] WGLC for draft-ietf-webpush-protocol (again)
X-BeenThere: webpush@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of potential IETF work on a web push protocol <webpush.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/webpush>, <mailto:webpush-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/webpush/>
List-Post: <mailto:webpush@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:webpush-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/webpush>, <mailto:webpush-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2016 15:27:48 -0000

I support the draft as-is. Once again, many thanks to the editors for their
fantastic work!

Thanks,
Peter

On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 8:58 AM, Shida Schubert <shida@ntt-at.com> wrote:

> All;
>
> As I noted on the e-mail I sent out on June 7th after the initial WGLC for
> webpush protocol draft, we are commencing another WGLC as there are no
> remaining issues on github AND the authors have produced the 06 version of
> the draft reflecting all resolutions.
>
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-webpush-protocol-06
>
> If you have any issues or questions regarding the draft please submit it
> to the list, when raising issues please provide constructive resolution
> whenever possible.
>
> PLEASE acknowledge on the list when you are content/happy with the status
> of the draft and you see no issue passing it forward to IESG for
> publication.
>
> The WGLC will conclude at the end of the day on July 8th PST.
>
> Shida
> As co-chair
>
> _______________________________________________
> Webpush mailing list
> Webpush@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/webpush
>
>

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email