IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Webpush] Receipt subscription follow-up

Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Tue, 26 April 2016 05:28 UTC

Return-Path: <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: webpush@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: webpush@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D52C712B030 for <webpush@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Apr 2016 22:28:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oZOc9k9rmr9c for <webpush@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Apr 2016 22:28:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ig0-x236.google.com (mail-ig0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AC3D612B017 for <webpush@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Apr 2016 22:28:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ig0-x236.google.com with SMTP id g8so6243913igr.0 for <webpush@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Apr 2016 22:28:40 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc; bh=aZQedIVXlitdQKRr5XHB3HK3t1m9JQE4scPAzLc2eXQ=; b=d1sbJjA+nQCzG405e9lQNd/Rhr99g5wDhgilTVdJVPxkbY70SF7ALBbLZtMlse4NgV slW0PdQQPlAnXaYf6f/cZZtBrgJ63JmnWIGdMPZp4k4OjiIMxenDlrRHt3bI+3joy16e Itvzz8wGjsBCu33hHE+KQESpcWJR2PCLdAkKEFzT3Z2dpxXQNAFVSnDS45L7GGHtxjxR JyhPLrDK1cMCDc0ItShxKuTI9zkOg6eW8woUOQarPylRTZcgoo3JpCuKVEO/BKQxdTb5 TYADBNQ4T71FqrefNJKbHCSfwJh1bCRugfgcYqOK6WDj3khn0Zf8FAhBCXHBeYF3zWX4 lEJg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc; bh=aZQedIVXlitdQKRr5XHB3HK3t1m9JQE4scPAzLc2eXQ=; b=cQcME3RKejNM7W0P4iQhJ0I5405HF4XzfG5mVqYwrb+7Uae/qCq4SACKYCJtXxJK11 Ps3d6/8CDoHVcn4gBv0gVMCixYGPvblzBKQ7sEDhSRYnQgGSerEwjY9DwPP2H5pTf8oo DVxhPwYVd5mBeYFPZi/GFvExdCeqoKpl7RWa26YEzOSkuT10b1rHU0HR9zt1nSEM+JWu qbtXFgyHrxiK26Iy3VA9R2Go2auOI9RLXqBVpQ9Dqflu6rFsn+Hah/ZRF5U/GmOtyROW Q2sNNebjDfxYQ87wLwpS7TM8wE37+wQS4DyDJnbIvbOhcZwlu8kh4IQA9kobOkxOUqHs RsGg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FXmADnvbi0FqMH7Hfs+juUhUAypUBdBxeDTcQJIzt00CVmFvoQ4P+51YbXb0FhfmcUEBW0UfuNqzQ4yMg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.50.59.211 with SMTP id b19mr1275554igr.58.1461648520112; Mon, 25 Apr 2016 22:28:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.36.43.82 with HTTP; Mon, 25 Apr 2016 22:28:40 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAP8-FqnSkmtpE3CaW10BoQkpd1E8Rt8T-sNB1avOBcsLhp_sdg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABkgnnXKDZvLWxkhFP0R4jW=ZyFwqiqQREFA5BFKH9i4PQCmyA@mail.gmail.com> <CAP8-Fq=Oi_kGebcRsyHYQdXWwLxFQxFwR=jeOyKS-+vW7eE=0w@mail.gmail.com> <CABkgnnX35n3K=cGTC2EvwG3=w6X7uWCikw+QFqhO7-RiLV8zJQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAP8-FqmcguLQaVxeNs1ROAG0XEBgYNtDiJ3+sYUcxmRrFfou1Q@mail.gmail.com> <CABkgnnUvimZ8z6XZBpKobjfp3R_WudV=ienXR-DH8B7Li98v0A@mail.gmail.com> <CAP8-FqnSkmtpE3CaW10BoQkpd1E8Rt8T-sNB1avOBcsLhp_sdg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2016 15:28:40 +1000
Message-ID: <CABkgnnWzi_Zvsfr=DQkyT0NGV2H5TROyB6eP=zsY-Rj4UBUERg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
To: Costin Manolache <costin@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/webpush/TAVgFkCcClwDMkyDFspSo6h0YeA>
Cc: "webpush@ietf.org" <webpush@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Webpush] Receipt subscription follow-up
X-BeenThere: webpush@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of potential IETF work on a web push protocol <webpush.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/webpush>, <mailto:webpush-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/webpush/>
List-Post: <mailto:webpush@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:webpush-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/webpush>, <mailto:webpush-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2016 05:28:42 -0000

On 26 April 2016 at 15:26, Costin Manolache <costin@gmail.com> wrote:
> The wording of the spec doesn't seem to ensure this.

Yes.  I'm trying to get that clarity now.

> I can see some benefits - but also costs :-)

Yes.  One way of managing the costs is to have the PS reject a push if
the number of receipt subscriptions gets too high.  Brian has text for
that in his PR for that already.

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email