IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Webpush] question on Urgency semantics in draft-ietf-webpush-protocol-04

Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Fri, 08 April 2016 17:34 UTC

Return-Path: <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: webpush@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: webpush@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7EDF12D0E4 for <webpush@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Apr 2016 10:34:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yIvC49wStO7b for <webpush@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Apr 2016 10:34:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ig0-x22c.google.com (mail-ig0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1A80D12D96B for <webpush@ietf.org>; Fri, 8 Apr 2016 10:34:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ig0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id gy3so40919863igb.1 for <webpush@ietf.org>; Fri, 08 Apr 2016 10:34:18 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc; bh=g6KUG8DUVHxOX9hVuKts7rEuI3S0ukMwYz060EjKgmg=; b=T//ysSUMXaqVt9gYsPrAFzujH+TMZQLWMOInIcW2h8QLbtISVCZOnwQVM1pXFZbejL ldpOBcq5UTuomLjx1wM2WhLGmgv6EH+Fif8m42Gml4nmYiMKGKeqMtCuuFt2+skhLeRn s1Tn85ensb0aQMcRORPa91nRVBQvjBqlr1FKad5ui7tBNdD6YmmmmB+nS96XUMjbRP6T Nr6WtFFwt38eIPZ/i/nzovc1E4UkGvyCV8lgc7/p+pNVlqb+k/yfeUEzuvwztXceZefq RZnLsKYHQfOwWI0l3iTDdAYlYunXkURBN/x6XliS5uutS9N2S/9/xRwAx1yDYw1HDGrF 74Ag==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc; bh=g6KUG8DUVHxOX9hVuKts7rEuI3S0ukMwYz060EjKgmg=; b=R68Y4E+aZ+ugx6MXUDxrUrzFTmP09iDSN4oQHhb/GRIvFuFFE3qncPHuK593vsMyN8 +ndEGt6m3NDXymWUyd47aGw27KMeT1I5qt09CTTXeodgQyF/hu/AEuwvnHkauU8Smur3 t7mhoW17m2EBRZStwrhm7M27IzmpMoeBwfKVUjPhbAYBz3CGfIdVY8eMlqPS+13nUpic 4d0AIw6YB1+x7ElT2pXKl3Y9oRnNdM3ZVUQivQNFu8In20x2LKy7PvwTr0UKgyQxp3/5 A4uG+ZfLJJGNl4F/Fam8DD9CE5apMCeG46KyfLYyZGrmSkTGp0WfvNUY8nt5gDB+ym87 Eq9w==
X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJIabo2r0p/JpQkBwO/TbBe6lKG5TGIp005Zn+jWpgNZFjT5DshYFJjuaeuDgkRNnlrfGboiEW3HZgXsqw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.50.23.80 with SMTP id k16mr5275442igf.94.1460136857419; Fri, 08 Apr 2016 10:34:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.36.43.5 with HTTP; Fri, 8 Apr 2016 10:34:17 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <DM2PR0301MB06549E093356C56AB315A09E83910@DM2PR0301MB0654.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
References: <D32C044E.A68E%d.thakore@cablelabs.com> <CABkgnnXZcMu5G9pTE1oCA=m31gLFsGkebYgaAhV3rBdm3r-u7Q@mail.gmail.com> <D32C2A23.A6C2%d.thakore@cablelabs.com> <DM2PR0301MB06549E093356C56AB315A09E83910@DM2PR0301MB0654.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2016 14:34:17 -0300
Message-ID: <CABkgnnWQF8BTkxNXNrWETF9OSjkF3Em89jRwUcmvcyWwy1YDmA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
To: Brian Raymor <Brian.Raymor@microsoft.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/webpush/T_AhUsikWDojWlLpgkbdIuKyO3k>
Cc: Darshak Thakore <d.thakore@cablelabs.com>, "webpush@ietf.org" <webpush@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Webpush] question on Urgency semantics in draft-ietf-webpush-protocol-04
X-BeenThere: webpush@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of potential IETF work on a web push protocol <webpush.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/webpush>, <mailto:webpush-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/webpush/>
List-Post: <mailto:webpush@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:webpush-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/webpush>, <mailto:webpush-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2016 17:34:31 -0000

On 8 April 2016 at 12:32, Brian Raymor <Brian.Raymor@microsoft.com> wrote:
> Does Mozilla or Google have any experiences to share for this scenario?

We don't have much data to share at this point.  However, as I noted,
we do have safeguard mechanisms in place to deal with this.

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email