Re: [Webpush] Warren Kumari's No Objection on draft-ietf-webpush-vapid-03: (with COMMENT)

Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Wed, 16 August 2017 00:22 UTC

Return-Path: <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: webpush@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: webpush@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 694FA1323B5; Tue, 15 Aug 2017 17:22:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rvaEu3eWphdY; Tue, 15 Aug 2017 17:22:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io0-x236.google.com (mail-io0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8E7F31323B0; Tue, 15 Aug 2017 17:22:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io0-x236.google.com with SMTP id j32so8460944iod.0; Tue, 15 Aug 2017 17:22:22 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=w0G4BjWJC4egOBLFNXfhHZBMC0clObs7ecamOv1BcpQ=; b=eaMfnkvvFS2wq4MpSBR3e8wXgbEZw+hQh4+QkXAqrTUMJWF7ReIB0Qg6zcxfmqwqgc oh+gL2o0xp/5V8es6k+/9YTiOthyz595eZDrOTavSqj22ZstChipYWLoe5F0FwHtVO8+ j16LzvnfxAo4I235q8gWlq0BemDZha5ZxJSzFiPP3PvksRUrVTy02jyZrqNkiBpOVXn6 6b4/3Mn2Z3SkNg+sH61ikQoiZ7Np18W4QKsZmReAcK+JGtndwiMYM2pe+EAUVvFx0mlf RvXpYBs38iZRtLhIXmbh7PCHPoom1DV3QHcgYdr3q9DTu7c8A6eHVx1reOcy0zkDfyyg az9g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=w0G4BjWJC4egOBLFNXfhHZBMC0clObs7ecamOv1BcpQ=; b=VUFBL6w9an68C+hPhU3e1Dm9ZwBHYTVNxOzAOa++AYqI8OYXc+c4lRgsqoGSilOlWa bfqJVvWw9LbUhRTrQrgyp8WWccfNhgQerYnXJ88dITUSxvarPCWSi5hu9uumJW9F56F4 IuR4UPC/qOWnqWcxXNAC+3bq20YsSTbj69f7ZkODk++8yGlV/kOFfuJatdhoPZ2AEI1Z gI5XroimTKrV5h+5utBpcc5spgmWGRkagR8/EDMPC/J21W2SzRPzIwzfaRVvqOBraESR VeeJintHkMgPbXGAm8tJ4T2hKjr1QXCPCpmHlklTCrkQEZhmYjXYfuN5/L0oPexozeKE Q+Wg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AHYfb5gi52WBhwGTOxcEBdoTC89szoLWaF3bnxVvROgbct1dvm0ogfgr /zuDmZ/DAkYm2s8DfiaNv5z25TUbyg==
X-Received: by 10.107.137.30 with SMTP id l30mr26193145iod.279.1502842941929; Tue, 15 Aug 2017 17:22:21 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.107.164.42 with HTTP; Tue, 15 Aug 2017 17:22:21 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <150281762174.21115.10126123891463241768.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
References: <150281762174.21115.10126123891463241768.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2017 10:22:21 +1000
Message-ID: <CABkgnnXDzjJoah_XnWQ2CjGXK8_rLanJF6PnV7zOo5w6rsrR-w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-webpush-vapid <draft-ietf-webpush-vapid@ietf.org>, Phil Sorber <sorber@apache.org>, webpush-chairs@ietf.org, "webpush@ietf.org" <webpush@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/webpush/UtDUehRuZVKtH_JyYvd0Q6shtsE>
Subject: Re: [Webpush] Warren Kumari's No Objection on draft-ietf-webpush-vapid-03: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: webpush@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of potential IETF work on a web push protocol <webpush.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/webpush>, <mailto:webpush-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/webpush/>
List-Post: <mailto:webpush@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:webpush-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/webpush>, <mailto:webpush-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2017 00:22:24 -0000

Capitalization here was fine, but I trimmed the "currently".  Thanks.

On 16 August 2017 at 03:20, Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>; wrote:
> Warren Kumari has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-webpush-vapid-03: No Objection
>
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
>
>
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>
>
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-webpush-vapid/
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> *Very* minor nits:
>
> 1: I'm reviewing both this document and draft-ietf-webpush-encryption (both of
> which have Martin Thomson as an author) -- these use different capitalizations
> for many terms, for example "user agent" vs "User Agent" -- this document
> references RFC8030, which has  these lower-case, and so I suspect that it is
> draft-ietf-webpush-encryption which should change, but I figured I'm mention it
> here as well.
>
> 2: Section 7. Acknowledgements
> "This document would have been much worse than it currently is if not for the
> contributions ..." Once published as an RFC, it is cast in stone. I support
> your the above, but think you should remove "currently", so perhaps: "This
> document would have been much worse if not for the contributions ..."
>
> Again, these are tiny nits, I don't have enough knowledge of the topic to make
> more useful comments :-P
>
>