Re: [Webpush] ietf-webpush-encryption - untrusted push services

Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Wed, 04 November 2015 00:29 UTC

Return-Path: <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: webpush@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: webpush@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6AD71B36E0 for <webpush@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Nov 2015 16:29:48 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ar2-3h0szmZj for <webpush@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Nov 2015 16:29:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-yk0-x22c.google.com (mail-yk0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c07::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C079A1B36DB for <webpush@ietf.org>; Tue, 3 Nov 2015 16:29:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: by ykek133 with SMTP id k133so45999608yke.2 for <webpush@ietf.org>; Tue, 03 Nov 2015 16:29:42 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=jp2q4f4cEWmuavs3PB/RnN1WqGW5QUg7KlMFuoYLw3Y=; b=i8OS9y+QMGHgoSiDSo+e1O7A0D++9/sD4hYNsfvdhI8C2FeMdB1m6e4MQ3m9W24Q7b CSgWZgQ2M23VuPFbkD7peGTR11GIWNBUiw7KiA06v1e8IDcGtS6IJRWrb+fuy48MXgRi QZ9bCxiADpOjX6rsYljsPn5FsqJhFe/T+InOoZ8aUC+OLh9Tjlz1h9WkbGwXc53mI7SF A7lKcsfq0vOc4lbyWJIrTwVwGQaNYS6tTdt2WxshVi//MOfx3sKUNxbJEtx0+xkiXAbg 84b8OuodCijth4waN6einmFxxxvQ96zx5mhr0jIgUc9aUG3enZkkUgU6ldyPm77YsyBg 3/DA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.129.79.6 with SMTP id d6mr25762766ywb.120.1446596982103; Tue, 03 Nov 2015 16:29:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.129.132.145 with HTTP; Tue, 3 Nov 2015 16:29:42 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAL9PXLy5PdAnM9+WSwaJbjS6_V-zYYeNnYcpcUw80UnW=kdWMA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CALt3x6n7L1Y4eMt=h7+Dq0-W8v4ynq_zQh4qLwr5D_kv8o4JmQ@mail.gmail.com> <CABkgnnUEqV6=YDrROXJq3ZRsiAvFE-z5pWt3JHZ90zsC4C8+3A@mail.gmail.com> <CAL9PXLy5PdAnM9+WSwaJbjS6_V-zYYeNnYcpcUw80UnW=kdWMA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2015 09:29:42 +0900
Message-ID: <CABkgnnXAsG2HRM3wam09ga8evkYm=k=ytck6P6qrnPKQ+G8Pjw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
To: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>, "webpush@ietf.org" <webpush@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/webpush/Z9FQN2epeIVIxjSYDKcg7XOHmHU>
Subject: Re: [Webpush] ietf-webpush-encryption - untrusted push services
X-BeenThere: webpush@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of potential IETF work on a web push protocol <webpush.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/webpush>, <mailto:webpush-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/webpush/>
List-Post: <mailto:webpush@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:webpush-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/webpush>, <mailto:webpush-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2015 00:29:49 -0000

On 4 November 2015 at 03:14, Adam Langley <agl@google.com> wrote:
> But, still, you can't depend on contributory behaviour. It's just not
> a property that's guaranteed.

Right.  I have requested that you put that in the security
considerations.  I am on the hook to produce a revision to the content
encryption draft that addresses the contributory behaviour concern.  I
expect that to be fairly simple in this case.  Expect something in a
week or so.