IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Webpush] WGLC for draft-ietf-webpush-protocol (again)

Benjamin Bangert <bbangert@mozilla.com> Fri, 01 July 2016 18:19 UTC

Return-Path: <bbangert@mozilla.com>
X-Original-To: webpush@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: webpush@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB43C12D75A for <webpush@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 Jul 2016 11:19:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mozilla-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3r6HqnnqTzZW for <webpush@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 Jul 2016 11:19:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io0-x235.google.com (mail-io0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E434512D0F5 for <webpush@ietf.org>; Fri, 1 Jul 2016 11:19:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io0-x235.google.com with SMTP id f30so107032839ioj.2 for <webpush@ietf.org>; Fri, 01 Jul 2016 11:19:44 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mozilla-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=E2t9ByWXKHtEH8meSYJHJgNG27ZDG3qFD0fo25hN7iE=; b=1ZQ6O4Ttsy4p/B8x+BSFxhAuITBZx26z+jNKkmHCOCcfvr8G073fkVaTZyFATwCRCp 2ty07ef1sAciY7uxtbYnnwNvqHeCEmid87o5/vnn4aYG28XOMf9mZivNITfZaneL12Yw jrUb7L2ugnN0VNjEpkFXxPosiyv6taN6E1cL4uVuGffmjjlnqxZ0W6xN5/nP8Y2cA06Y 3dzVn6TGF2ODQPo3W+P6YjIfx3v1ddlysbzP2uoQc/Kcn/MrWZWZ1BUBMv+wr78XMJ1n xcwGJ7u+ZnunXdceYr60RCxYm66cm6w9hUfFokotGiz8ZzOqZEPKpg434D6XLkjpLo31 MvwA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=E2t9ByWXKHtEH8meSYJHJgNG27ZDG3qFD0fo25hN7iE=; b=CzSeuuYOIZ+z8RQu96vA5p8eevsvp9krrau8rclfiBkg/XgTPwApba6ESFA7+MVeZw BYvc/hNjHjqsx17jO+qmgD+5ycSo6z7qHo71rPT2OKEc2RbpHa4M9MnHafJ8hPa9EIpc mvwfK1EDrYYl4YLHPHZig+GNdnQHmQ3q7LmaZ0yiE9C6i8IXASzChBlEdlWP1QaW3F45 zhsiKUsY90FprVs54kaAbJkPDOpDBwgD/oQrWNdgI1qm6EOAIw1aMZ5hns2htKnr/qVj 5haGGHg6q33p1MZEGsWy17s5PaYNMmuROKgciZSgCF+AHzScBToa1e8GtzyJFlGlLafI 1P7g==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tI1BuyqH02FxX2KWITCcENlUoK/U+bvi/mUNWBLJTCBrj1LFXrDSkiUf6eWeLA6ugtMbVxLq6tfNc2Sed3+
X-Received: by 10.107.132.28 with SMTP id g28mr23847294iod.34.1467397184213; Fri, 01 Jul 2016 11:19:44 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.79.70.71 with HTTP; Fri, 1 Jul 2016 11:19:43 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <786718A2-C28D-436C-B91D-B3217F459F2E@mozilla.com>
References: <E7305E31-07A2-4B84-AA90-635AB97E46DF@ntt-at.com> <fee55fa2-fbdf-b63e-7acb-b0b429deb0ff@mozilla.com> <786718A2-C28D-436C-B91D-B3217F459F2E@mozilla.com>
From: Benjamin Bangert <bbangert@mozilla.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2016 11:19:43 -0700
Message-ID: <CABp8EuL6M39wCK4ZCDgN6O0Gi_GHJhBLR36L4KWb_9=Y=KaRGA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Kit Cambridge <kcambridge@mozilla.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113f377ae8f84d05369707a9
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/webpush/ZEpxxKpIckenPJALRnW4JCmKrUM>
Cc: jr conlin <jconlin@mozilla.com>, "webpush@ietf.org" <webpush@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Webpush] WGLC for draft-ietf-webpush-protocol (again)
X-BeenThere: webpush@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of potential IETF work on a web push protocol <webpush.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/webpush>, <mailto:webpush-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/webpush/>
List-Post: <mailto:webpush@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:webpush-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/webpush>, <mailto:webpush-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2016 18:19:48 -0000

I'm happy with the draft as-is. Thanks to the editors and chairs.

Cheers,
Ben

On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 8:06 AM, Kit Cambridge <kcambridge@mozilla.com>
wrote:

> I support the draft, with gratitude to the editors and chairs for their
> hard work.
>
> Cheers,
> - kit
>
>
> On Jun 23, 2016, at 5:23 PM, jr conlin <jconlin@mozilla.com> wrote:
>
> I have no additional concerns or requests for this protocol, and support
> this draft.
>
> Huge thanks to the editors and contributors for their patience and
> understanding.
>
> On 6/23/2016 12:58 AM, Shida Schubert wrote:
>
> All;
>
> As I noted on the e-mail I sent out on June 7th after the initial WGLC for
> webpush protocol draft, we are commencing another WGLC as there are no
> remaining issues on github AND the authors have produced the 06 version of
> the draft reflecting all resolutions.
>
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-webpush-protocol-06
>
> If you have any issues or questions regarding the draft please submit it
> to the list, when raising issues please provide constructive resolution
> whenever possible.
>
> PLEASE acknowledge on the list when you are content/happy with the status
> of the draft and you see no issue passing it forward to IESG for
> publication.
>
> The WGLC will conclude at the end of the day on July 8th PST.
>
> Shida
> As co-chair
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Webpush mailing listWebpush@ietf.orghttps://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/webpush
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Webpush mailing list
> Webpush@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/webpush
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Webpush mailing list
> Webpush@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/webpush
>
>

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email