IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Webpush] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on draft-ietf-webpush-protocol-11: (with COMMENT)

Brian Raymor <Brian.Raymor@microsoft.com> Thu, 13 October 2016 04:10 UTC

Return-Path: <Brian.Raymor@microsoft.com>
X-Original-To: webpush@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: webpush@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0579B12980D; Wed, 12 Oct 2016 21:10:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.022
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.022 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=microsoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZEvXpr79z_9y; Wed, 12 Oct 2016 21:10:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from NAM03-CO1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-co1nam03on0137.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.40.137]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5C021129818; Wed, 12 Oct 2016 21:04:32 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=nCG1L8C/Tzx8zI6nM82lxLiasgSW+X5Kqv5XBTMdeR8=; b=YREtWubL/qGBBXh3yEeAhQsWQbT3fVH6UUpNOt7Tcvc2AH83ML0RwIj5dNafdrYnBqwuHf6xD7tNBApMbgbIKLao+NSdAahdlUDaHSPKbsAN9DJ2BkU9ng98UgOlohrY0SvslZyYzWPlyEjM21uli6ElZ1buKYHoyNW0WB3dpwo=
Received: from CY1PR03MB2380.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.167.8.6) by CY1PR03MB2380.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.167.8.6) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P384) id 15.1.659.11; Thu, 13 Oct 2016 04:04:31 +0000
Received: from CY1PR03MB2380.namprd03.prod.outlook.com ([10.167.8.6]) by CY1PR03MB2380.namprd03.prod.outlook.com ([10.167.8.6]) with mapi id 15.01.0659.020; Thu, 13 Oct 2016 04:04:31 +0000
From: Brian Raymor <Brian.Raymor@microsoft.com>
To: "kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com" <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on draft-ietf-webpush-protocol-11: (with COMMENT)
Thread-Index: AQHSJLYoZNpGErSVEEe1X/Yl9wYANaClkmGwgAAM2QCAACUIsA==
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2016 04:04:30 +0000
Message-ID: <CY1PR03MB2380B6C5D937DCAE0E725ED983DC0@CY1PR03MB2380.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
References: <147629678445.6285.5038003546245862234.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CY1PR03MB23809509AFCB9DBB5B66900083DC0@CY1PR03MB2380.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> <EB148FDB-4AB6-41D1-B2B2-2E6E8632EAE2@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <EB148FDB-4AB6-41D1-B2B2-2E6E8632EAE2@gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=Brian.Raymor@microsoft.com;
x-originating-ip: [174.61.159.182]
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 13936f0f-991b-45e4-24fd-08d3f31e08d5
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; CY1PR03MB2380; 7:NqClFw2snmuf4Jt5ZKkZ/UJLgxYOiuuE9/FVfftI2zJ/f35UAikVG/0TQikJyWx9d+TEjx2pAWtDDeyIKOiJdxf0z4yJK+A5yf/zEy9ZasseQ6KIj3TWgnHnFY6v9A+PACZ9QQDkhV3dJ1Q3sxF34+KF9MSF1eV8+UDWyZZDtVaCESAcJHxIS9JzsAy/eBXIwt2YU6Yu0r72JuIRcyOgTgsqh8GN6myUgbYItkupVilgXMuG8ll8cntIaa+qcwbudo+rT7Kt1W7U57xlhbwFTq1MwkzSEBvJ7vzSd+vqQjAwB2uzL/4Xpt83ZdRQeKjapKTiDgAQv1aeTBmTcgBn9EUhgiFyFnEHMOSFDpj+ymoR1BuOl+riaOkIre0J2v5U
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:CY1PR03MB2380;
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <CY1PR03MB2380432B5E48F46FF9251C0F83DC0@CY1PR03MB2380.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(166708455590820)(192374486261705);
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(61425038)(6040176)(601004)(2401047)(5005006)(8121501046)(3002001)(10201501046)(6055026)(61426038)(61427038); SRVR:CY1PR03MB2380; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:CY1PR03MB2380;
x-forefront-prvs: 0094E3478A
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(7916002)(13464003)(377454003)(24454002)(51914003)(189002)(199003)(76176999)(11100500001)(122556002)(105586002)(6916009)(86362001)(86612001)(305945005)(2950100002)(2351001)(7846002)(7736002)(97736004)(2900100001)(106356001)(99286002)(106116001)(33656002)(19580395003)(19580405001)(3660700001)(15975445007)(110136003)(87936001)(74316002)(230783001)(7696004)(8936002)(5640700001)(2501003)(5660300001)(92566002)(3280700002)(8676002)(9686002)(10090500001)(2906002)(54356999)(68736007)(66066001)(586003)(4326007)(102836003)(5005710100001)(101416001)(3846002)(76576001)(6116002)(10400500002)(189998001)(5002640100001)(10290500002)(81166006)(81156014)(77096005)(8990500004)(50986999); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:CY1PR03MB2380; H:CY1PR03MB2380.namprd03.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1; LANG:en;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: microsoft.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: microsoft.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 13 Oct 2016 04:04:30.8773 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 72f988bf-86f1-41af-91ab-2d7cd011db47
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: CY1PR03MB2380
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/webpush/Zh88J3JfkFiUwO4h5t76bvDrU0k>
Cc: "draft-ietf-webpush-protocol@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-webpush-protocol@ietf.org>, Shida Schubert <shida@ntt-at.com>, "webpush-chairs@ietf.org" <webpush-chairs@ietf.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, "webpush@ietf.org" <webpush@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Webpush] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on draft-ietf-webpush-protocol-11: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: webpush@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of potential IETF work on a web push protocol <webpush.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/webpush>, <mailto:webpush-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/webpush/>
List-Post: <mailto:webpush@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:webpush-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/webpush>, <mailto:webpush-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2016 04:10:11 -0000

Done.

-----Original Message-----
From: kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com [mailto:kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2016 6:52 PM
To: Brian Raymor <Brian.Raymor@microsoft.com>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>; draft-ietf-webpush-protocol@ietf.org; Shida Schubert <shida@ntt-at.com>; webpush-chairs@ietf.org; webpush@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on draft-ietf-webpush-protocol-11: (with COMMENT)



Please excuse typos, sent from handheld device 

> On Oct 12, 2016, at 9:09 PM, Brian Raymor <Brian.Raymor@microsoft.com> wrote:
> 
> 
>> The only thing I might add is a note on the varying levels of security
>> offered by the HTTP authentication methods, which are documented in their
>> RFCs.  Adding just that point to the following (phrased however you'd
>> like) would be helpful:
>>    A push service MAY
>>   choose to authorize requests based on any HTTP-compatible
>>   authorization method available, of which there are numerous options.
> 
>> The somewhat recent updates to Basic & Digest do a really great job at
>> saying how awful they are and there are some experimental options that
>> offer some promise now.
> 
> Proposed text - https://github.com/webpush-wg/webpush-protocol/pull/139/files

Thanks for the quick update.  I would just say 'with varying levels of security.'  The security considerations sections for each of the methods available for HTTP are included in the RFCs for each.

Thank you,
Kathleen 
> 
> 
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email