IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Webpush] Delivery receipts support

Elio Damaggio <elioda@microsoft.com> Tue, 07 June 2016 00:45 UTC

Return-Path: <elioda@microsoft.com>
X-Original-To: webpush@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: webpush@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3337112B063 for <webpush@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 6 Jun 2016 17:45:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.002
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.002 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=microsoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kMFTNtZgcdE5 for <webpush@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 6 Jun 2016 17:45:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from na01-by2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-by2on0732.outbound.protection.outlook.com [IPv6:2a01:111:f400:fc0c::732]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D492B12D738 for <webpush@ietf.org>; Mon, 6 Jun 2016 17:45:53 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=LTSUW219176SPrcHaqTvd7RgVJD35pbjL7e3CO94lE8=; b=SqMLVWz1ce2n+fu61GbfxlNUi8zrQRSGtMVLcsMstjo/3pP7OeF681ovfHpTldDI5eX4zWkgjeYi+reGUjxGTnIh/VEH7j5ZgNuhnPFkq8LxwiYGi7oM34KULGrq3A+IcTsOzg450Qq9aXfxW6tIcr7hj3M+GFNS6rBVddjxX+8=
Received: from BY2PR0301MB0632.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.160.63.12) by BY2PR0301MB0632.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.160.63.12) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.492.11; Tue, 7 Jun 2016 00:45:52 +0000
Received: from BY2PR0301MB0632.namprd03.prod.outlook.com ([10.160.63.12]) by BY2PR0301MB0632.namprd03.prod.outlook.com ([10.160.63.12]) with mapi id 15.01.0492.020; Tue, 7 Jun 2016 00:45:52 +0000
From: Elio Damaggio <elioda@microsoft.com>
To: "webpush@ietf.org" <webpush@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Webpush] Delivery receipts support
Thread-Index: AQHRve5vKCZC2BHYGUKWvoiJbF7Otp/dLCvg
Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2016 00:45:51 +0000
Message-ID: <BY2PR0301MB06324E8418681D06C346BE2CCB5D0@BY2PR0301MB0632.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
References: <CABkgnnWeVS7Kp2Sm_5yLp-5yZoc6fVXWpV=sFdz2VZPHGkmkbQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABkgnnWeVS7Kp2Sm_5yLp-5yZoc6fVXWpV=sFdz2VZPHGkmkbQ@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=elioda@microsoft.com;
x-originating-ip: [2001:4898:80e8:9::61c]
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 6ac31a8d-9044-48ac-1ca8-08d38e6d139e
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; BY2PR0301MB0632; 5:d9A+tsn5DES3LzBR4p7Cdu5y4ohhXRly9UhiN/DFKg8vKOi0eFqAC+tP9dFznmUqlwefQxPLFnF/EOhLJcA/iyyoQIJNm2q7MwrwZ5vasvCXbyC0fodgcWU6fyL5ksuaYXkQlF0oqdl8IZX9jDjd+Q==; 24:EbtKpcwLlXsnN8+G2vx+K7ZBl5I9nQJNFMcUVEO5EOB6QznXYoWX1C17bDvFU4/gZqGw1mmhUdK3uqcuJ0+7rMNCZ6l5+VW1u7HuqW34sXQ=; 7:bXDRxkyr8Wy8o6weMclWKoVw7Ah8d3KYwUbvXQSa6kdcidotvduPnolvnpt/i37iozSPvEiLC/57XqeRM9spcX5/Q0q4uBrpelbeDFxdla01SkoVx/ptn+JJEK+aM2NbS7Z15mevIz/ZHr0k+i0SIo3R6m7uOnWDuSkMWs4JhpFsyVrmJ8H//UHTDa2KYGnFY9L/hRS/hezJKD/x5ZxhtUwI0na00LKzY+5mKcbEWGW2XQwtlHCtNg5GNuOgx+cy
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:BY2PR0301MB0632;
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BY2PR0301MB06325E4ECC5F0C6E8B10EC95CB5D0@BY2PR0301MB0632.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(189930954265078)(219752817060721)(36081394915603);
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(61425038)(601004)(2401047)(5005006)(8121501046)(10201501046)(3002001)(6055026)(61426038)(61427038); SRVR:BY2PR0301MB0632; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:BY2PR0301MB0632;
x-forefront-prvs: 09669DB681
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(13464003)(377454003)(199003)(12063002)(189002)(3905003)(10290500002)(76176999)(10400500002)(10090500001)(105586002)(101416001)(68736007)(5005710100001)(86612001)(2906002)(99286002)(8990500004)(450100001)(1730700003)(81166006)(2950100001)(15975445007)(19580395003)(50986999)(54356999)(2501003)(76576001)(11100500001)(8676002)(122556002)(2900100001)(19580405001)(8936002)(92566002)(5008740100001)(81156014)(87936001)(3280700002)(74316001)(9686002)(5004730100002)(86362001)(5003600100002)(189998001)(77096005)(3660700001)(6116002)(106356001)(106116001)(97736004)(2351001)(107886002)(110136002)(5002640100001)(33656002)(586003)(5640700001)(102836003)(3826002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:BY2PR0301MB0632; H:BY2PR0301MB0632.namprd03.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1; LANG:en;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: microsoft.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:23
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: microsoft.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 07 Jun 2016 00:45:51.7330 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 72f988bf-86f1-41af-91ab-2d7cd011db47
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BY2PR0301MB0632
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/webpush/_2XK11G97Uso7avqXnrqavI2A3s>
Subject: Re: [Webpush] Delivery receipts support
X-BeenThere: webpush@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of potential IETF work on a web push protocol <webpush.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/webpush>, <mailto:webpush-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/webpush/>
List-Post: <mailto:webpush@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:webpush-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/webpush>, <mailto:webpush-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2016 00:45:56 -0000

I would prefer not to reopen this.

For context, at the time it was decided to avoid making this optional in order to avoid fragmentation, especially possible for multiplatform apps.
In my times at Notification Hubs, this was a critical feature that many customers have to implement on their own, using their own channel, and negatively affecting battery life with additional connections.

For additional context, Azure Mobile Engagement (https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/services/mobile-engagement/) and similar products (https://www.urbanairship.com/), all would be able to leverage receipts.

-----Original Message-----
From: Webpush [mailto:webpush-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Martin Thomson
Sent: Friday, June 3, 2016 4:20 PM
To: webpush@ietf.org
Subject: [Webpush] Delivery receipts support

Costin (on github) said:
> Since we have open issues with receipts - can we not make it mandatory ? It's very unlikely all implementations will be able to support the receipts any time soon, at least not as push promises.

We discussed this in the past.  At that time, we decided to make support of delivery receipts mandatory.  Do people want to reopen that issue?

Note that I don't believe that any implementation currently supports receipts.  I had expected that to be a temporary situation, but if people expect that this will be a problem, now would be a good time to hear of it.

_______________________________________________
Webpush mailing list
Webpush@ietf.org
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3a%2f%2fwww.ietf.org%2fmailman%2flistinfo%2fwebpush&data=01%7c01%7celioda%40microsoft.com%7c8be5a9d4b6a649ef606e08d38c058cf2%7c72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7c1&sdata=gfZh5%2bqsN4fxcZ1JsgFp4Jk7WZwkr%2bSWwvZ7b245PrM%3d

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email