IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Webpush] Non-blocking comments on -05

RUELLAN Herve <Herve.Ruellan@crf.canon.fr> Thu, 02 June 2016 09:09 UTC

Return-Path: <Herve.Ruellan@crf.canon.fr>
X-Original-To: webpush@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: webpush@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A1DA12D67A for <webpush@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Jun 2016 02:09:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.326
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.326 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.426] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oIBMbLZ0aWEB for <webpush@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Jun 2016 02:09:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from inari-msr.crf.canon.fr (inari-msr.crf.canon.fr [194.2.158.67]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5633F12D5DD for <webpush@ietf.org>; Thu, 2 Jun 2016 02:09:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mir-bsr.corp.crf.canon.fr (mir-bsr.corp.crf.canon.fr [172.19.77.99]) by inari-msr.crf.canon.fr (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id u5299aVe018073 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 2 Jun 2016 11:09:36 +0200
Received: from Antiope.crf.canon.fr (antiope.fesl2.crf.canon.fr [172.19.70.56]) by mir-bsr.corp.crf.canon.fr (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id u5299a5Q001167; Thu, 2 Jun 2016 11:09:36 +0200
Received: from Antiope.crf.canon.fr (172.19.70.56) by Antiope.crf.canon.fr (172.19.70.56) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.995.29; Thu, 2 Jun 2016 11:09:35 +0200
Received: from Antiope.crf.canon.fr ([fe80::5c25:f890:ae73:d15a]) by Antiope.crf.canon.fr ([fe80::5c25:f890:ae73:d15a%12]) with mapi id 15.00.0995.032; Thu, 2 Jun 2016 11:09:35 +0200
From: RUELLAN Herve <Herve.Ruellan@crf.canon.fr>
To: "kcambridge@mozilla.com" <kcambridge@mozilla.com>
Thread-Topic: [Webpush] Non-blocking comments on -05
Thread-Index: AQHRu3RPtv1gb54CNUWyRYz7Gkh/JZ/UfYOQgADSzoCAAFBvAIAAI8UA
Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2016 09:09:35 +0000
Message-ID: <1464858574.5342.12.camel@crf.canon.fr>
References: <CALt3x6=_yc9TegOut_g+6W5fvhP7sfW+_gwRZnEVFA5PNgER6Q@mail.gmail.com> <6af49c2baf1b4e4f884b812d573b947e@Antiope.crf.canon.fr> <CABkgnnWebfxnPOLMXK+n+2G=c8DOG4Eb4AWMsWXJmmdnE4pUwg@mail.gmail.com> <989D9268-BE9A-47F7-9181-C0F323D1DA1F@mozilla.com>
In-Reply-To: <989D9268-BE9A-47F7-9181-C0F323D1DA1F@mozilla.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-mailer: Evolution 3.12.11 (3.12.11-1.fc21)
x-originating-ip: [172.20.5.129]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <BBD1A0BD3B445841A2A18C56A9E66D4F@crf.canon.fr>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/webpush/g_z7C2LvUE4b25CRPQupKcVEvE8>
Cc: "Brian.Raymor@microsoft.com" <Brian.Raymor@microsoft.com>, "martin.thomson@gmail.com" <martin.thomson@gmail.com>, "webpush@ietf.org" <webpush@ietf.org>, "beverloo@google.com" <beverloo@google.com>
Subject: Re: [Webpush] Non-blocking comments on -05
X-BeenThere: webpush@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of potential IETF work on a web push protocol <webpush.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/webpush>, <mailto:webpush-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/webpush/>
List-Post: <mailto:webpush@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:webpush-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/webpush>, <mailto:webpush-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2016 09:09:41 -0000

Hi Kit,

On Thu, 2016-06-02 at 00:01 -0700, Kit Cambridge wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> First, I'd like to echo Peter's "thank you". I'm very grateful for all your work in putting this standard together and marshaling feedback, here and on GitHub! In addition to the comments from Peter, JR, and Hervé, I have a few questions and suggestions. None of them block the WGLC.
> 
> In section 4.1, I'm not clear what "unable to receive push messages that are aggregated for the lifetime of the subscription" means. If the UA is forwarding requests, could it still disaggregate messages sent to a subscription set before delivering them to the other clients?
> 

The use case here is that the user agent is acting as a proxy for
another client for monitoring a subscription. This can be for example a
camera using a mobile phone to monitor its subscription. The
subscription should be linked to the client and not the user agent to
allow the client to use another user agent as a proxy without changing
the subscription.

I just created a pull request for trying to make this use case clearer:
https://github.com/webpush-wg/webpush-protocol/pull/96

Cheers,

Hervé

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email