Re: [Webpush] WGLC for draft-ietf-webpush-vapid-02

Costin Manolache <costin@gmail.com> Wed, 19 April 2017 20:18 UTC

Return-Path: <costin@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: webpush@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: webpush@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2A1F129C43 for <webpush@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Apr 2017 13:18:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.698
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.698 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dxOgs9EQzir9 for <webpush@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Apr 2017 13:18:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yw0-x234.google.com (mail-yw0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c05::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ED7C5129C48 for <webpush@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Apr 2017 13:18:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yw0-x234.google.com with SMTP id j9so22638715ywj.3 for <webpush@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Apr 2017 13:18:45 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=H5bAoVvmgFuVPjCajpfF70Hqc1UKGJcSn60RTLxGRSw=; b=FaNFgRMb8a+AKOKeTXBhXomSP4guLpfcnUbcSxI01uustYaZHR3jlqgBhi6vLSw521 MteUDHxnGzKEyTuo/o2y1h6nBAGADuw3SasmLdsGj1UcZAUczz0FqsudQ/V8lImctiBm IeMNI0eFtyr4xUVwdfNXkRPqV3O13s9YFCXU5UcIo2mXgeRXpWANwpmodX0eCrbbQjK/ aaB7rQtz3h7WDpyYy0H4ROlMFoMaYfKULMcS0VguEYgwIXDBDglJRWUADmpgYnbuxeJe akxaB3VYhf7NMe5Ich6dqv94vKfI9MN8WgjKQST1YsycwdXn3SC29XJmvZS89r045fJZ BHZg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=H5bAoVvmgFuVPjCajpfF70Hqc1UKGJcSn60RTLxGRSw=; b=exo/0BZaDG8qTE1DCHvZe6ZC5zaTlHP2O+3f+qXC3hICvNQcg+p62dxQYf6HH0QJK3 1sdW04/6l8YyFBpM40NbaczHVkOSzr9X0pSkXhsgjXMGbOF4oD2JHeIbXFzP+yEkSkAe qybuAYQ906bksokradgjkvRKuXRJ22Ua6CGzR6cJv4NaryXAdnqGKyidaZwMpYqxIq8E Dk+M4NUltvkt019J9O5cYqc1gfxnQqgnMwcrJAHIcG9NxXlob4cB4Q+M8AGUO/9H6Sme oAAV7Lg6zMY/8SETGf0vrV5AYEMML4JdxhvXBK9qSFFzIUxpWrKEbI+YUszBQfV7uvGG iDiw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AN3rC/4g4foQ/zPAyyJ7mG9qMagVSuRjvfHYS6Uik/3mLsBYdzkYxBXa Tttua+q6kS5eGCeEaEwD0NGapPQOkg==
X-Received: by 10.202.85.3 with SMTP id j3mr2154454oib.98.1492633125289; Wed, 19 Apr 2017 13:18:45 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.182.97.161 with HTTP; Wed, 19 Apr 2017 13:18:44 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <ace459b3-79f7-b12a-eb5a-d4af06c00cbd@mozilla.com>
References: <CABF6JR3W3W3Pgs5oqQ3VuD1RMMu_-+7ftUoRJNmJq+ayF24aQA@mail.gmail.com> <ace459b3-79f7-b12a-eb5a-d4af06c00cbd@mozilla.com>
From: Costin Manolache <costin@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2017 13:18:44 -0700
Message-ID: <CAP8-FqmOvPMd_vjmnsZWsRTG_yJzP7Y9Mhnp=AdT9aNWsOFfjA@mail.gmail.com>
To: jr conlin <jconlin@mozilla.com>
Cc: "webpush@ietf.org" <webpush@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a113d37e83686cc054d8abb14"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/webpush/hYucRUKRyXBX_9lV5dhpIOK6Wio>
Subject: Re: [Webpush] WGLC for draft-ietf-webpush-vapid-02
X-BeenThere: webpush@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of potential IETF work on a web push protocol <webpush.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/webpush>, <mailto:webpush-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/webpush/>
List-Post: <mailto:webpush@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:webpush-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/webpush>, <mailto:webpush-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2017 20:18:48 -0000

+1

Costin

On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 2:53 PM, jr conlin <jconlin@mozilla.com> wrote:

> I'm fine with the proposed changes, and have worked them into my support
> libraries.
>
>
> On 4/18/17 1:43 PM, Phil Sorber wrote:
>
> Hello All,
>
> Just getting caught up on doc status by reading the email archive and I
> see that both outstanding WG docs were in WGLC two months ago, however
> draft-ietf-webpush-vapid never got any feedback, positive or negative. If
> anything was sent direct to the chairs before I was added, I am not able to
> see that. Please reply back to the list with any feedback you have. I'll
> leave this open for 1 week.
> Thanks.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Webpush mailing listWebpush@ietf.orghttps://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/webpush
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Webpush mailing list
> Webpush@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/webpush
>
>