IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Webpush] Make it a bit more obvious which is the send resource

Brian Raymor <Brian.Raymor@microsoft.com> Fri, 10 June 2016 21:28 UTC

Return-Path: <Brian.Raymor@microsoft.com>
X-Original-To: webpush@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: webpush@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E51DA12D8E0 for <webpush@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Jun 2016 14:28:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.003
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.003 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=microsoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0h6CsN_faW5Q for <webpush@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Jun 2016 14:28:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from na01-by2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-by2on0110.outbound.protection.outlook.com [207.46.100.110]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0A58712D966 for <webpush@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 Jun 2016 14:28:07 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=7W+ec/7zkZG1iP5e7Gk63iWDrh3qGLiAunTZbXIKENk=; b=lsJaCMWberaahTBQh1M0PJd289TOlVbrXEmvO1OKPIWs9xgBrGS/dOmzEyOjhOrScvfjV4GMNk0VGJrF153QXw1IbV2+YBUYAUW/S9LgR2r7ZyBxEPYu3HEHjVKw/3hj4oRjUUqNN9BfFueK1OoOtdS1xPIZ55L3PsbGWVEDUVI=
Received: from CO2PR03MB2407.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.166.93.137) by CO2PR03MB2408.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.166.93.138) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P384) id 15.1.517.8; Fri, 10 Jun 2016 21:28:06 +0000
Received: from CO2PR03MB2407.namprd03.prod.outlook.com ([10.166.93.137]) by CO2PR03MB2407.namprd03.prod.outlook.com ([10.166.93.137]) with mapi id 15.01.0517.005; Fri, 10 Jun 2016 21:28:06 +0000
From: Brian Raymor <Brian.Raymor@microsoft.com>
To: "webpush@ietf.org" <webpush@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Make it a bit more obvious which is the send resource
Thread-Index: AdHDXNhAonl6T8X8QNqz9D+vlR3ieg==
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2016 21:28:06 +0000
Message-ID: <CO2PR03MB240709765D6BB0CFF75CFE1483500@CO2PR03MB2407.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=Brian.Raymor@microsoft.com;
x-originating-ip: [24.16.23.27]
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 5bc22ace-542e-4276-8f23-08d391761d18
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; CO2PR03MB2408; 6:BpZzh0wllWOpaWx6HzjS2kLKKBaLR4p/UE7F+JZ/pkE4Zx4rXYsnsjU1JP9+MMFGsJSmUWNfTvbmYlXJjQkDFL3nBWtBVR4VJzJGyV3raJQDaErFTylQaJwzC+W13n39Et890m/2Y8QaHJ+ZRAyQtszQwNuZMYyPjqImluOxXHiPSIvrawVyeMllo3Xovuf9yaV+jhP/BFH5nH/oef/Ke5pILuU09YoxYrNWa82BR0QCSH3buQ0UChRH/t1dhU36TYUBiESGjZsCoMc4pmAk7dsXwIYm88eUyhGbO/EyjgOivIjEmLP4IiFGOMZ83kx9HWan/cDx9gR2D/jck0xAfQ==; 5:8Fbys3lEm38RDav7Rtph2L059dt18w91CFLCgi3hobhtU1uyaKNiaXqkNoEz8+fbeJkZahih4MTJ4xyk8a9gW6aXHKEPpu8aNcwDN8CJvdDnaYjVkBIGEfIk1/tTGNKWGmuMWAuosmqxi56MxYrgGg==; 24:b3rZ4rpO6iQcTmFpBGVI3TkzjS++jwpU+MHuLzgSM/OyGshZo+W1z9Yn0g2afdhwhrwb7LMp4nUf4Bg6z4IjzLAJrKDkO1tjLo/fXl8qu/I=; 7:hufru43eAUmWLkTLc9xtlFa9E7IP+qMix8yUWvccCpUbfBe5ox+J1CtUIWoSLihBqsDq/Zu4Pse2zlXOZEA8LYGzQu7lcdcxGANdA4o0CRm0qwF/rJlR/HhUvA7FeZqEcns0+T9QF9cQavgctKaETZ8TbvOYvBn/3WWAquvOGnLPJYtZWP1x/tAjxEBzoTtcDgML1zShNZxbo2i+5tNjKLh2dPphwzdZeZjjiEjQPQQ8j4tdh1ZFiRvo9I7brSu0
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:CO2PR03MB2408;
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <CO2PR03MB240800F849DB6E2D891D5A5E83500@CO2PR03MB2408.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(158342451672863)(166708455590820);
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(61425038)(601004)(2401047)(8121501046)(5005006)(3002001)(10201501046)(6055026)(61426038)(61427038); SRVR:CO2PR03MB2408; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:CO2PR03MB2408;
x-forefront-prvs: 096943F07A
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(7916002)(199003)(189002)(74316001)(2906002)(50986999)(6116002)(54356999)(33656002)(97736004)(8676002)(19580395003)(102836003)(77096005)(92566002)(81166006)(81156014)(5003600100002)(1730700003)(8936002)(3846002)(110136002)(86612001)(189998001)(86362001)(5002640100001)(2900100001)(101416001)(87936001)(586003)(11100500001)(2351001)(15975445007)(107886002)(2501003)(9686002)(229853001)(99286002)(450100001)(106356001)(10400500002)(10290500002)(5004730100002)(105586002)(122556002)(5005710100001)(10090500001)(5640700001)(3660700001)(3280700002)(5008740100001)(68736007)(66066001)(76576001)(8990500004); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:CO2PR03MB2408; H:CO2PR03MB2407.namprd03.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1; CAT:NONE; LANG:en; CAT:NONE;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: microsoft.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: microsoft.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 10 Jun 2016 21:28:06.9376 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 72f988bf-86f1-41af-91ab-2d7cd011db47
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: CO2PR03MB2408
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/webpush/i2-SJDQ83pgYUZbfedb4Bg09cOo>
Subject: [Webpush] Make it a bit more obvious which is the send resource
X-BeenThere: webpush@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of potential IETF work on a web push protocol <webpush.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/webpush>, <mailto:webpush-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/webpush/>
List-Post: <mailto:webpush@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:webpush-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/webpush>, <mailto:webpush-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2016 21:28:10 -0000

https://github.com/webpush-wg/webpush-protocol/pull/105

Costin noted - "push resource" is confusing me every time - "push" is used in all other resources.

The original text:

The push service MUST provide a URI for the push resource
corresponding to the push message subscription in a link relation of
type "urn:ietf:params:push".

Bikeshed follows.

Would adding "delivery" clarify the use? This would match how we currently describe the process when
the application server sends a message. It requests "delivery":


The push service MUST provide a URI for the push *delivery* resource
corresponding to the push message subscription in a link relation of
type "urn:ietf:params:push:delivery".

5. Requesting Push Message Delivery
An application server requests the delivery of a push message by
sending a HTTP POST request to a push *delivery* resource

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email