IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Webpush] WGLC for draft-ietf-webpush-vapid-02

Phil Sorber <sorber@apache.org> Tue, 25 April 2017 21:34 UTC

Return-Path: <sorber@apache.org>
X-Original-To: webpush@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: webpush@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7089F12EC9D for <webpush@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 25 Apr 2017 14:34:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.42
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.42 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VFIn1ZbbQ01d for <webpush@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 25 Apr 2017 14:34:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id A5C95129436 for <webpush@ietf.org>; Tue, 25 Apr 2017 14:34:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 2458 invoked by uid 99); 25 Apr 2017 21:34:44 -0000
Received: from mail-relay.apache.org (HELO mail-relay.apache.org) (140.211.11.15) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 25 Apr 2017 21:34:44 +0000
Received: from mail-io0-f175.google.com (mail-io0-f175.google.com [209.85.223.175]) by mail-relay.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mail-relay.apache.org) with ESMTPSA id A10BA1A0A97 for <webpush@ietf.org>; Tue, 25 Apr 2017 21:34:44 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-io0-f175.google.com with SMTP id r16so218620104ioi.2 for <webpush@ietf.org>; Tue, 25 Apr 2017 14:34:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Gm-Message-State: AN3rC/6haNBR/EYdmox7Wc3rnhw2295X2jhGViYhMtml0MPplISi6ZTR 9kjK/Oujl0EH1MdQVw2TsfqEopY8Rw==
X-Received: by 10.107.131.224 with SMTP id n93mr19873650ioi.39.1493156083923; Tue, 25 Apr 2017 14:34:43 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CABF6JR3W3W3Pgs5oqQ3VuD1RMMu_-+7ftUoRJNmJq+ayF24aQA@mail.gmail.com> <ace459b3-79f7-b12a-eb5a-d4af06c00cbd@mozilla.com> <CAP8-FqmOvPMd_vjmnsZWsRTG_yJzP7Y9Mhnp=AdT9aNWsOFfjA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAP8-FqmOvPMd_vjmnsZWsRTG_yJzP7Y9Mhnp=AdT9aNWsOFfjA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Phil Sorber <sorber@apache.org>
Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2017 21:34:33 +0000
X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: <CABF6JR2VOXRFSE_dLQC_Nax+feowos0tWMvaoqz7XR6nL62C_A@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CABF6JR2VOXRFSE_dLQC_Nax+feowos0tWMvaoqz7XR6nL62C_A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Costin Manolache <costin@gmail.com>, jr conlin <jconlin@mozilla.com>
Cc: "webpush@ietf.org" <webpush@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a113ed108fa30e5054e047d60"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/webpush/kVBHQnwacI7_J4BEslvRvqjI_Fg>
Subject: Re: [Webpush] WGLC for draft-ietf-webpush-vapid-02
X-BeenThere: webpush@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of potential IETF work on a web push protocol <webpush.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/webpush>, <mailto:webpush-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/webpush/>
List-Post: <mailto:webpush@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:webpush-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/webpush>, <mailto:webpush-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2017 21:34:47 -0000

Ok, it seems like we have consensus on this. I am going to move this doc to
"waiting for writeup" and I'll shepherd it.

Thanks.

On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 2:19 PM Costin Manolache <costin@gmail.com> wrote:

> +1
>
> Costin
>
> On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 2:53 PM, jr conlin <jconlin@mozilla.com> wrote:
>
>> I'm fine with the proposed changes, and have worked them into my support
>> libraries.
>>
>>
>> On 4/18/17 1:43 PM, Phil Sorber wrote:
>>
>> Hello All,
>>
>> Just getting caught up on doc status by reading the email archive and I
>> see that both outstanding WG docs were in WGLC two months ago, however draft-ietf-webpush-vapid
>> never got any feedback, positive or negative. If anything was sent direct
>> to the chairs before I was added, I am not able to see that. Please reply
>> back to the list with any feedback you have. I'll leave this open for 1
>> week.
>> Thanks.
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Webpush mailing listWebpush@ietf.orghttps://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/webpush
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Webpush mailing list
>> Webpush@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/webpush
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Webpush mailing list
> Webpush@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/webpush
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email