Re: [Webpush] New encryption and vapid drafts
Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Fri, 23 December 2016 02:49 UTC
Return-Path: <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: webpush@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: webpush@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 815851294BF for <webpush@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Dec 2016 18:49:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HhCH4eLo7TXn for <webpush@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Dec 2016 18:49:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qk0-x22c.google.com (mail-qk0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 67B0A129468 for <webpush@ietf.org>; Thu, 22 Dec 2016 18:49:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qk0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id u25so121828092qki.2 for <webpush@ietf.org>; Thu, 22 Dec 2016 18:49:49 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=GVttNGWyd88BaeAxnzUF5E24DIVfg1YUMYKuYIFq+5Y=; b=JPxGPOrFj7dy/QtGtcttk8P7ZZguNcgTlpqsoaije+1VTn/P3f4zPfxtONLBfkIjXc Xn/uMWpg3XnEZf/DNtb8ha4750Y2mOkkLe/+3wW+uC/wZwHmBto8PE0LUVKgjWrKOkJT k8Yp4fbYykENia9M6cIYgRY4pyPkJacfXRRuFKi6MgO67ES3jVTjNHLGpvi71ls5/HrP wpfEN0gEREVSrPXbMpqUzfe9UVQKlBJ69EA8Vz0rjYdOjhtOL7QKnR9vt/vpDBQU61yc M8lC5+i2HBvbE+0up4AbG4oxy0P+VG1hc4JWnP5G4pHRdFl9VUFxCY/T6Z9LdTaYyGm6 pefQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=GVttNGWyd88BaeAxnzUF5E24DIVfg1YUMYKuYIFq+5Y=; b=O9OXHmFYzNqGDM3zFjSPNmsaMyU4j8S2Qk3IQ8JZa/f/TtXSUNa4eipUhN/jQnV/vU ozpH+AY/lBaAN5bIRLA5AeQ4+Y5YlL3Jkn0gJQBffoGPW/VhN97X/jbq1ehsq25VpGYL av6ft4CvnLmKFWpA65nSXahOtrgE582tIUDplVHLda5ar2HbFsPGdyiFca+rrOr5Xaqy fuYQlrrA/uu4yWB8a30sjCrpI7ZijFv15eSg0ZqZ8rQ2Ej13+MKJ/tXHkil1d+CzXC2G 4k2GhBmGJLrbkooGWD/MwspbNMrFu/6WaOFE6MUOZznUEEn7r8IVz6Q1b4n6DdYJrrOY EEyQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXJs/IIbEKIEburW480Z5m7DEzm+gu30mL0GkCUn7PL3BpD78jSS+Lg9HY9CdAUFHyMNVCBbhUWxFYs8fA==
X-Received: by 10.55.74.77 with SMTP id x74mr11405623qka.316.1482461388516; Thu, 22 Dec 2016 18:49:48 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.140.38.233 with HTTP; Thu, 22 Dec 2016 18:49:48 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CABkgnnUuNiFGpVnfwrhLe8vEWsx-q1+mohdPAKKQnT0EWSa0rQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABkgnnUuNiFGpVnfwrhLe8vEWsx-q1+mohdPAKKQnT0EWSa0rQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2016 13:49:48 +1100
Message-ID: <CABkgnnVx+++gz6MTD9C5sUnCQe2_urbD4sMC6o1s16HQEm4LzA@mail.gmail.com>
To: "webpush@ietf.org" <webpush@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/webpush/keMnd6Y8CoCC3vk8WVFutCANn38>
Subject: Re: [Webpush] New encryption and vapid drafts
X-BeenThere: webpush@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of potential IETF work on a web push protocol <webpush.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/webpush>, <mailto:webpush-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/webpush/>
List-Post: <mailto:webpush@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:webpush-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/webpush>, <mailto:webpush-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2016 02:49:50 -0000
As it turns out, I should avoid writing specs while tired. The webpush drafts are unaffected by the changes to the HTTP specs. Since I'm here, the library that I maintain will soon implement the latest version. I'm updating the record size handling right now. On 23 December 2016 at 00:47, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> wrote: > After a burst of activity in November, we had a few fairly significant > updates to these documents. Most significant is the changes to the > base document in the HTTP working group. > > Now that that has settled down, I've merged the PRs and submitted new versions. > > Bad news is that I forgot something in the HTTP doc, so there will be > a new version of encryption. It's minor, but important enough to > catch in a new revision. I'll get to that within 24 hours.
- [Webpush] New encryption and vapid drafts Martin Thomson
- Re: [Webpush] New encryption and vapid drafts Martin Thomson