IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Webpush] Voluntary Application Server Identification -02

Costin Manolache <costin@gmail.com> Mon, 01 February 2016 20:33 UTC

Return-Path: <costin@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: webpush@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: webpush@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB75D1B362F for <webpush@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Feb 2016 12:33:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6IAvo8CtB13x for <webpush@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Feb 2016 12:33:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-oi0-x22f.google.com (mail-oi0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8EF1F1B3633 for <webpush@ietf.org>; Mon, 1 Feb 2016 12:33:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-oi0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id p187so97886733oia.2 for <webpush@ietf.org>; Mon, 01 Feb 2016 12:33:46 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=JtHQB3C2PunDTWjoq8uIGj6v9zkns1IzBVBO7Q9MBxo=; b=VVNPbl7YYy3f5zGtLvPFzsgyfX9QjrnEbtIZa+ZKVGmdfrf5Nns7j8/BPt6SWSrznd O1wU8EyQCc26QU9LKSTAVbOoRraTLxRXpYMr01Dos9RdcZlkel+9gGrhRMgLMbSEUzMB iF2EcgrJ6JUBkT5dmh3C5d0q2QseN0yW2hJ5UZ9UCUAU/1ajyCSq2fT4ouxCzJ45Ioof 4Fpo2E3MAbtL+2O8A7PHaMiZdW4suxncWjblnCFM1fX60DiEjyVAFZXaXk46H7+jhc0w SkOptMXZBYLwpwKlMuO8VC30nRKF4kEjMpmNJxgqxZXisQh74UCY8GfMttHC3UWFmXLI MuHA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=JtHQB3C2PunDTWjoq8uIGj6v9zkns1IzBVBO7Q9MBxo=; b=SkrUKBNVcgTt2qe5oEqgGD1To3wclaSaWUfbDqUUHdDMusZf3Haeu0iMWsVZQqmB+G 4oBE4ILUNCxG9QawpWjUj+0BX4jo8t1Oy5b+h+kA3WvloIE2lnkt6Q3cntWW9Nx65UhB e0P8pfSNZczp8o2piIOfDeC21Y2WWpAuipMwYMyyHLsSUtM+ItmhP+XWFwIKR2BaoRV0 YcFNxqN/74vdX2UFNn5w9GI1vFuOhYPQ8S9SKfnzKI4Ev9+5MMdT8c4q4nQM6hxXVviq y0rBsfJ384lhw8BysCR89EPkykUZI7I/eQldDc4Oh48mb3TN+Ebr9VTOkFSS/0FTPlfO Z66g==
X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOTx3tFlaqvSTw1bVWOpmusQNsz205VoppjtwGfpH2O2ZipOFhArt4by1CQzv55pGbVbqBlCJvQKn4YJNw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.202.204.16 with SMTP id c16mr9494586oig.93.1454358826027; Mon, 01 Feb 2016 12:33:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.76.8.74 with HTTP; Mon, 1 Feb 2016 12:33:45 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CALt3x6=T7+PDBRYfBeSNuCABi824Vpno9N+2Y7Jg=5pYUxBvCw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABkgnnXMA1do2jLoNuALz5V+416RELu=FWyEj8nExC+xn3vnpw@mail.gmail.com> <CALt3x6=T7+PDBRYfBeSNuCABi824Vpno9N+2Y7Jg=5pYUxBvCw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2016 12:33:45 -0800
Message-ID: <CAP8-FqkTteuTU8JpqWCr-7LB9niM4ng26U8gomWrc=zvp4xJ5w@mail.gmail.com>
From: Costin Manolache <costin@gmail.com>
To: Peter Beverloo <beverloo@google.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1134fde8339abd052abb4dce
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/webpush/ks5kjfABQZ9uMQ7kbgvBfHLqcOs>
Cc: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>, "webpush@ietf.org" <webpush@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Webpush] Voluntary Application Server Identification -02
X-BeenThere: webpush@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of potential IETF work on a web push protocol <webpush.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/webpush>, <mailto:webpush-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/webpush/>
List-Post: <mailto:webpush@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:webpush-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/webpush>, <mailto:webpush-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Feb 2016 20:33:50 -0000

+1

Costin

On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 10:43 AM, Peter Beverloo <beverloo@google.com> wrote:

> Thank you for publishing the draft, Martin!
>
> While I'm not sure how much significance it carries since I'm listed as an
> editor, I do of course support the draft as the resolve to Issue 44.
>
> Server authentication and subscription association are important problems
> to us, and, pending any further feedback from the working group, we plan to
> adopt the proposed solution in our implementations.
>
> Thanks,
> Peter
>
> On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 1:56 AM, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> I have just posted a new version of the draft, taking the recent
>> feedback from discussions into account.
>>
>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-thomson-webpush-vapid-02
>>
>> This includes only the JWT option, with a lot more of the details
>> fleshed out.  I've implemented it in order to create the example, and
>> that is dead simple to do.
>>
>> I think that this is the answer we want for issue 44 [44].  Does the
>> group agree? Is this worth adopting?
>>
>> [44] https://github.com/webpush-wg/webpush-protocol/issues/44
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Webpush mailing list
>> Webpush@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/webpush
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Webpush mailing list
> Webpush@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/webpush
>
>

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email