IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Webpush] WGLC for draft-ietf-webpush-encryption-07

Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Tue, 14 February 2017 02:02 UTC

Return-Path: <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: webpush@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: webpush@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 856C31299F7 for <webpush@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Feb 2017 18:02:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JutJLHZ0L0b2 for <webpush@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Feb 2017 18:02:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qk0-x234.google.com (mail-qk0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D68A6129501 for <webpush@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 Feb 2017 18:02:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qk0-x234.google.com with SMTP id p22so18953017qka.0 for <webpush@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 Feb 2017 18:02:12 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=DS05paL+aRQpjM99FLfz6QgikfaZBo8hLaPNRONcXUY=; b=rQVvO7058N33wyjGj1c9ob3vtF5mEnRNBAxRflOYr7yVtSpPWTy4nwmzsqeQywAsMM slJI5sA2CqPyt5y/wc/imSedb4oWuKdtGfPsmjTp4wdnbvYktSO+zYJYOHN1tCDPhRVN Wa/Do5dwnC39aBKJxKdGgPPNkbwbbjchfriMMcHANFtlHfRkbZV/x6K7ZrbO/ZI6tSWc jXelTriOSTSZrwtbnkE+8rDbPdcoOcm1We39tZhw36op0s2fc1nFhW6PuicwS0HM5c3F bAqlhEI3JBdcqxdCkwN4Ex+eMIvXE6Ie5r30FN/oO7GbVvpw2a2dLKUDG8504WtXp/nh /BQQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=DS05paL+aRQpjM99FLfz6QgikfaZBo8hLaPNRONcXUY=; b=OdeeQ9f6Wka6S2brVwnGpmkZEItZ4WSweGPsNuqNlhePJAqK6arIrJp+JGC79V699N SZonT2RviS7YkJ1Ubl0VIO7+nxM0XTGl3RmCyxC3rHKZT2CO9EYA3tJ+r9au7yOJ4zdN PAkdLddOhzXPi4+WqCUfpAiLK1SxeMy7t7WzJvSIQe4dVNl/dGPzRkmXL6fCX8+vHna0 OUpoQV6x3JALDpwFyIYXu6KhG/YWlhY5b7UqIZ9bCe0YfeTWVY54NBjfcLOZrx2H2/ps f/pqak+/sNwz421y6EWU7FlHFb4zc3j3Zu9yRM3Y2KMa7lM/2OH62LE26BssCElpJYRK 6opg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39lEAo/YqhiQHHCyv9q9eUzX0bjtPxnnyDzcgNIT6a/McDi7ea34VCb0ljxta0YvdEVjNiag978YyH+7Zg==
X-Received: by 10.233.235.66 with SMTP id b63mr26691317qkg.144.1487037731945; Mon, 13 Feb 2017 18:02:11 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.140.19.112 with HTTP; Mon, 13 Feb 2017 18:02:11 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CABkgnnXLzWik122D1KefL=UEVgWBZ-A=_S5f=y9PpefVjG9w3Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <04EFDA44-A77F-4B9A-A95E-6DCA2A8AB1CD@gmail.com> <CAEeQnYK_cuapQhtZ1zcqeDyuofZeWyjpw=SX0UqkaaN3cwJ8Yw@mail.gmail.com> <CABkgnnXLzWik122D1KefL=UEVgWBZ-A=_S5f=y9PpefVjG9w3Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 13:02:11 +1100
Message-ID: <CABkgnnVhBZR7pu0JzQtqwuTQ3ywRv+3khPdjNu-sB0WYLe-H9Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Kit Cambridge <kit@mozilla.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/webpush/l-tZlPRgcbhqAuJ8CUeXPcY1X48>
Cc: "webpush@ietf.org" <webpush@ietf.org>, Shida Schubert <shida.at.ietf@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Webpush] WGLC for draft-ietf-webpush-encryption-07
X-BeenThere: webpush@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of potential IETF work on a web push protocol <webpush.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/webpush>, <mailto:webpush-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/webpush/>
List-Post: <mailto:webpush@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:webpush-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/webpush>, <mailto:webpush-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 02:02:14 -0000

I have just pushed new versions of the affected drafts.  Given that
the changes are pretty small in the webpush doc, perhaps we can just
use -08 instead.

On 14 February 2017 at 08:44, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 13 February 2017 at 20:35, Kit Cambridge <kit@mozilla.com> wrote:
>> Thank you for sending this out, Shida! Sorry if this is a silly question:
>> since this draft relies substantially on
>> http://httpwg.org/http-extensions/draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding.html,
>> does it make sense to defer last call until that's ready, or include ECE in
>> the last call alongside this one?
>
>
> Yes, there have been changes there that were the result of discussions
> in HTTP.  That should be resolved in a few weeks.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email